Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06JAKARTA2848
2006-03-03 10:14:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Jakarta
Cable title:  

BA'ASYIR REVIEW MOVES FORWARD WITH AMROZI TESTIMONY

Tags:  PTER PREL PGOV KJUS KISL KVPR ASEC AS ID 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6512
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHJA #2848/01 0621014
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 031014Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY JAKARTA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0499
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 9076
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0607
RUCNFB/DIR FBI WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 JAKARTA 002848 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EAP/MTS AND S/CT
DOJ FOR CTS THORNTON, AAG SWARTZ
FBI FOR ETTIU/SSA ROTH

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/03/2026
TAGS: PTER PREL PGOV KJUS KISL KVPR ASEC AS ID
SUBJECT: BA'ASYIR REVIEW MOVES FORWARD WITH AMROZI TESTIMONY

REF: A. JAKARTA 01142 JUDICIAL REVIEW CONTINUES WITHOUT

SURPRISES

B. 05 JAKARTA 16933 COURT DELAYS RULING ON REVIEW

C. 05 JAKARTA 16515 LAWYERS FOR BA'ASYIR CLAIM "NEW
EVIDENCE"

D. 05 JAKARTA 16215 BA'ASYIR SEEKS RELEASE

E. 05 JAKARTA 11125 INDONESIA COULD CUT PRISON
SENTENCE

F. 05 JAKARTA 03026 BA'ASYIR CONVICTED

Classified By: Political Officer Tim Hefner For Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

Summary
--------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 JAKARTA 002848

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EAP/MTS AND S/CT
DOJ FOR CTS THORNTON, AAG SWARTZ
FBI FOR ETTIU/SSA ROTH

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/03/2026
TAGS: PTER PREL PGOV KJUS KISL KVPR ASEC AS ID
SUBJECT: BA'ASYIR REVIEW MOVES FORWARD WITH AMROZI TESTIMONY

REF: A. JAKARTA 01142 JUDICIAL REVIEW CONTINUES WITHOUT

SURPRISES

B. 05 JAKARTA 16933 COURT DELAYS RULING ON REVIEW

C. 05 JAKARTA 16515 LAWYERS FOR BA'ASYIR CLAIM "NEW
EVIDENCE"

D. 05 JAKARTA 16215 BA'ASYIR SEEKS RELEASE

E. 05 JAKARTA 11125 INDONESIA COULD CUT PRISON
SENTENCE

F. 05 JAKARTA 03026 BA'ASYIR CONVICTED

Classified By: Political Officer Tim Hefner For Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

Summary
--------------


1. (C) Convicted Bali bomber Amrozi testified on behalf of
Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) Emir Abu Bakar Ba'asyir in the
months-old Judicial Review request process (ref A). However,
the results of his testimony have yet to reach the South
Jakarta District Court, which scheduled its next session for
March 8. After gathering all evidence for the review
request, the court must submit its findings and a written
opinion to the Supreme Court, which may then rule on the
Judicial Review. Ba'asyir's defense attorneys continue to
call for his immediate release and claim incorrectly that he
should be freed June 1. Prison officials governing
Ba'asyir's incarceration have stated that June 14 is the
correct date. GOI prosecutors see little chance that
Ba'asyir could stand trial a third time. End Summary.

Amrozi Testifies
--------------


2. (C) At the direction of the South Jakarta District Court,
the Cilacap District Court in Central Java, which holds
jurisdiction over the Nusa Kembangan prison currently holding
Amrozi, allowed him to testify in Cilacap on February 22 in
support of Ba'asyir's requested Judicial Review. The South
Jakarta District Court, which originally convicted Ba'asyir
of "sinister conspiracy to cause a fire or explosion,
resulting in deaths" (ref F),postponed its next judicial

review session until March 8 pending the documentation on
Amrozi's testimony in Cilicap. Senior Muslim Defense Team
(TPM) attorney Achmad Michdan traveled to Cilacap on March 1
to review the written record of Amrozi's testimony. We have
yet to obtain a copy.


3. (C) TPM has sought repeatedly to have Amrozi testify on
Ba'asyir's behalf, but South Jakarta judges refused to allow
the testimony without giving prosecutors the opportunity to
argue against it. The criminal procedure code does not
delineate the process by which witnesses may give testimony
in a Judicial Review request. TPM has indicated in court
documents that Amrozi would testify as to the veracity of
statements he made in a March 24, 2005 letter previously
submitted in the review process (ref B, C). In the letter,
Amrozi claims that he never discussed the 2002 Bali bombing
operation with Ba'asyir, a claim which contradicts testimony
used to convict Ba'asyir in March 2005. (Comment: TPM
submitted the same letter to the Appeals Court after
Ba'asyir's March 3, 2005 conviction. The Appeals Court
upheld Ba'asyir's conviction and sentence.)

Supreme Court to Decide on Review
--------------


4. (U) Once the South Jakarta District Court has gathered all
documents and evidence related to the Judicial Review
request, the Court must draft an opinion on whether the
criteria for a Judicial Review, either new evidence or
judicial error, have been met. It must forward this opinion
and all documented findings to the Supreme Court, which must
decide whether the criteria for a Judicial Review have been
met. If so, the Supreme Court will review the case and can
ultimately uphold the conviction, reduce the sentence, or
acquit the convicted individual (ref D).

Release Date for Ba'asyir
--------------


5. (C) The Criminal Procedure Code does not clearly state how
release dates are determined when remissions have altered

JAKARTA 00002848 002 OF 002


sentence lengths (ref E). However, officials at Cipinang
prison, where Ba'asyir currently serves his sentence, told
Australian diplomats recently that they have determined
Ba'asyir's release date to be June 14. TPM has demanded
Ba'asyir's immediate release since the outset of the Judicial
Review request process (ref C),and they have publicly
claimed Ba'asyir's release date is June 1.

Third ABB Trial Not Likely
--------------


6. (C) Prosecutors who have handled terrorism cases,
including Salman Maryadi, the former lead prosecutor against
Ba'asyir, have told us and our Australian counterparts on
several occasions that they do not see a way to prosecute
Ba'asyir a third time. They noted that with current
evidence, they do not know of a crime that they could use to
charge Ba'asyir, as most prosecutions link defendants to
specific acts. Also, prosecutors have said that Indonesian
law has a "double jeopardy" clause which would prevent the
GOI from charging Ba'asyir again in connection with the 2002
Bali bombing. Additionally, prosecutors point to "political
sensitivities" which would make a third Ba'asyir arrest
extremely difficult for the GOI to undertake.

Comment
--------------


7. (C) With just over three months left in Ba'asyir's prison
term, the Judicial Review request process continues at a slow
pace, and several steps remain before the Supreme Court makes
a ruling. The admission of Amrozi's testimony does not
indicate that the courts have moved closer to prematurely
releasing Ba'asyir. Although high-profile CT initiatives
have abated somewhat after the flurry of attention following
the killing of JI master bombmaker Azahari, political winds
still favor holding the line in CT. With Ba'asyir's second
prison stay almost over, only a complete acquittal and
repudiation of his conviction would strike a serious blow to
GOI CT efforts. Regardless of the outcome, TPM will continue
to use the Judicial Review as a public relations vehicle for
Ba'asyir until his release.
PASCOE