Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06ISTANBUL1717
2006-09-21 16:23:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Consulate Istanbul
Cable title:  

ELIF SAFAK ACQUITTED WHILE ARTICLE 301 REMAINS ON

Tags:  PGOV PHUM TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6130
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHIT #1717/01 2641623
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 211623Z SEP 06
FM AMCONSUL ISTANBUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5949
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ISTANBUL 001717 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/20/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM TU
SUBJECT: ELIF SAFAK ACQUITTED WHILE ARTICLE 301 REMAINS ON
TRIAL

REF: 05 ISTANBUL 2134

Classified By: Consul General Deborah K. Jones for reasons 1.4 (b) and
(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ISTANBUL 001717

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/20/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM TU
SUBJECT: ELIF SAFAK ACQUITTED WHILE ARTICLE 301 REMAINS ON
TRIAL

REF: 05 ISTANBUL 2134

Classified By: Consul General Deborah K. Jones for reasons 1.4 (b) and
(d)


1. (C) Summary: The long anticipated trial of Elif Safak
began and ended today with a prosecutor reluctantly
recommending and a judge agreeing to acquit the renowned
author of charges stemming from Turkey's controversial
Article 301. Protesters remained out of view with extreme
security measures in place at the Beyoglu 2nd Court of First
Instance in Istanbul. Turkish-EU joint parliamentary
committee chairman, Joost Lagendijk, noted the "absurdity" of
the case and suggested that if Turkey reformed Article 301,
the EU may be more willing to compromise on other issues such
as customs disputes related to Cyprus. End summary.

--------------
THE DECISION
--------------


2. (SBU) We joined attorneys, representatives from
international human rights organizations and Lagendijk, among
others, in a packed courtroom for the trial of author Elif
Safak, accused under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code of
having insulted the Turkish state. The defendant, who gave
birth to her first child five days ago, was absent from the
proceedings. Her accuser, Kemal Kerincsiz, a nationalist
lawyer who earned the world's attention by bringing Article
301 related charges against another famed Turkish author,
Orhan Pamuk (see reftel) was the subject of much press
attention upon arriving at the courthouse but, from what we
could tell, was also not present in the courtroom. The trial
began with nationalist lawyers heatedly arguing that
Lagendijk's presence challenged the legal system and put
pressure on judge Irfan Adil Uncu to rule in Safak's favor.
As a result, the lawyers demanded the judge's recusal, which
he promptly refused.


3. (SBU) The prosecutor immediately recommended that Safak
be acquitted due to lack of evidence that she intended to
insult the Turkish state. He argued that, looking at her
book as a whole, it was clear she did not intend to insult
Turkishness. He concluded there were no statements in the
book which indicated that the comments made by fictional
characters reflected Safak's opinion. (Note: The charges

against Safak stemmed from dialogue between fictional
characters in her novel, "The Bastard of Istanbul." End
note.) Nationalist lawyers, seeing the writing on the wall,
left the courtroom in protest before the judge rendered his
decision to acquit Safak. Press later reported PM Erdogan
was pleased with the decision, stating "these issues should
be discussed with the Government and opposition since these
laws are not here to stay forever."

--------------
SECURITY LESSONS LEARNED FROM PREVIOUS TRIALS
--------------


4. (SBU) Security at the courthouse was extremely tight with
well over a hundred uniformed police, many in riot protection
gear, flanking the entrance and alleys inside the compound.
Armed security forces were visible on the bridge and roads
above and behind the courthouse. Those who were present at
the Pamuk trial--where protesters congregated en masse and
threw eggs at the author--agreed that security was much
better prepared for today's proceedings. Indeed, we did not
see any protesters, though we were told that while we were
inside the courtroom, a group of nationalists clashed with
leftists outside the compound. Human rights NGO members also
told us that they were asked by police at the compound
entrance whether they were Safak supporters or protesters.
Supporters, it seems, were welcome though they were not
required to prove their allegiance.

--------------
EU OPINION--STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH
--------------


5. (C) We spoke to Lagendijk while we waited to enter the
courtroom. He stated he has always had an interest in these
cases but that this one was particularly "absurd" because it
had to do with fictional characters. "It reminds me of
Eastern Europe pre-1989," he explained to a reporter. We
asked him whether in his opinion these cases were more
important to Turkey's EU accession than international
disputes over such issues as Cyprus. He responded that for
EU politicians they were not/not but that for the EU public
they were. The public, he argued, does not understand the

ISTANBUL 00001717 002 OF 002


complexities involved in the international disagreements but
that these trials hit home and make the front pages of
newspapers. He speculated that if the Government of Turkey
(GOT) were to amend Article 301, the EU might be willing to
show flexibility on other requirements.


6. (C) Comment: Safak's acquittal and PM Erdogan's comments
following the decision are certainly positive developments
which come at a critical time, with the EU now scheduled to
release its annual report card on Turkish reforms November 8.
The circumstances associated with this trial showcased on a
world stage the "absurdity"--to use Lagendijk's
description--of Article 301. At the same time, those who
argue there is no need to change Article 301--GOT Justice
Minister Cemil Cicek, for instance--will claim this decision
proves that the penal code and the justice system work and
that this decision, along with other decisions to acquit or
suspend such cases, establishes the necessary precedent
prosecutors and judges require to make fair decisions.
JONES