Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06HELSINKI1073
2006-10-20 11:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Helsinki
Cable title:  

A READ-OUT ON THE EU-INDIA SUMMIT

Tags:  PREL ENRG PGOV EUN ETRD FI IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5563
RR RUEHAG RUEHROV
DE RUEHHE #1073 2931108
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 201108Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2634
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT 0082
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0089
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 0005
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 0012
C O N F I D E N T I A L HELSINKI 001073 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/20/2016
TAGS: PREL ENRG PGOV EUN ETRD FI IN
SUBJECT: A READ-OUT ON THE EU-INDIA SUMMIT


Classified By: POLCHIEF GREGORY THOME FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L HELSINKI 001073

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/20/2016
TAGS: PREL ENRG PGOV EUN ETRD FI IN
SUBJECT: A READ-OUT ON THE EU-INDIA SUMMIT


Classified By: POLCHIEF GREGORY THOME FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (SBU) Emboffs met Oct. 18 with Johan Schalin, Prime
Minister Matti Vanhanen's Special Advisor for Foreign
Affairs. Schalin offered the following tidbits from the
Oct. 12-13 EU-India Summit:

Joint Action Plan and a Bilateral Trade Agreement
-------------- --------------

2. (SBU) The Summit's brightest spots, according to
Schalin, included progress made toward formalizing a
Joint Action Plan (JAP) on strategic partnership and
positive discussions of an eventual bilateral EU-India
trade agreement. The JAP's actual parameters remain
somewhat vague, but it offers a framework for expanding
cultural, technological and business exchanges, Schalin
said. The EU and India agree that a bilateral trade
agreement -- only in the discussion stage at this point
-- is meant to be complementary to and not a replacement
for progress in the WTO context.

Hard Bilateral Push on Civilian-Nuclear Deal
--------------

3. (C) There was less of a meeting of the minds
regarding the US-India civil nuclear agreement. The GOI
had hoped that the Summit's formal agenda and
conclusions could make reference to the deal. However,
Schalin said, the EU has adopted a "non-position" on the
agreement, choosing purposely to remain neutral because
of the obvious lack of consensus among member states
regarding nuclear power in general. Recognizing this,
Prime Minister Singh did not insist on a statement from
the EU. Singh did make a surprisingly hard push
bilaterally with the GOF, Schalin said, but PM Vanhanen
was not prepared to deviate from the EU line at a Summit
he was hosting. (COMMENT: The Indians' pressure also
put the Finnish PM in a tough spot domestically. Both
Vanhanen and the coalition government he leads are
supportive of nuclear power, and unofficially he has
even commented positively on the US-India agreement.
Ironically, however, the PM's views put him at odds with
his own Center Party, which strongly opposes nuclear
power.)

Stymied on Burma, Iran
--------------

4. (C) Certain regional issues also proved somewhat
sensitive. While the EU was satisfied with the Summit's
joint statements on Sri Lanka, North Korea and
Afghanistan, the Indians initially rejected outright the
EU's effort to adopt strongly-worded conclusions on
Iran, Burma and Lebanon, Schalin reported. After much
negotiation, the GOI finally accepted a watered-down
conclusion in support of Lebanon and the implementation
of UNSCR 1701. However, the Indians would not even
consider EU language criticizing the Burmese junta's
human rights record or in support of UN sanctions
against Iran. The Indian counterproposals were so weak
that they "actually would have damaged what the Union
wanted to achieve," Schalin said, forcing the EU to
settle for nothing better than noting that Burma and
Iran's nuclear program were "discussed."
WARE