Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06HARARE77
2006-01-24 14:11:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Harare
Cable title:
TRIPARTITE NEGOTIATING FORUM YIELDS LITTLE
VZCZCXRO0293 RR RUEHMR DE RUEHSB #0077 0241411 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 241411Z JAN 06 FM AMEMBASSY HARARE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9489 INFO RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY RUEHUJA/AMEMBASSY ABUJA 1045 RUEHAR/AMEMBASSY ACCRA 0878 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0554 RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI 3440 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0878 RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC RUEKDIA/DIA WASHDC RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC RUFGNOA/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1260 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0522 RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L HARARE 000077
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
AF/S FOR BNEULING
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR C. COURVILLE
USDOC FOR ROBERT TELCHIN
TREASURY FOR J. RALYEA, B. CUSHMAN
PASS USTR FOR FLORIZELLE LISER
STATE PASS USAID FOR MARJORIE COPSON
USDOL FOR ROBERT YOUNG
US MISSION GENEVA FOR JOHN CHAMBERLAIN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2009
TAGS: ELAB PGOV PREL ECON ZI
SUBJECT: TRIPARTITE NEGOTIATING FORUM YIELDS LITTLE
REF: HARARE 08
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. for reason 1.4 b/d
C O N F I D E N T I A L HARARE 000077
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
AF/S FOR BNEULING
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR C. COURVILLE
USDOC FOR ROBERT TELCHIN
TREASURY FOR J. RALYEA, B. CUSHMAN
PASS USTR FOR FLORIZELLE LISER
STATE PASS USAID FOR MARJORIE COPSON
USDOL FOR ROBERT YOUNG
US MISSION GENEVA FOR JOHN CHAMBERLAIN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2009
TAGS: ELAB PGOV PREL ECON ZI
SUBJECT: TRIPARTITE NEGOTIATING FORUM YIELDS LITTLE
REF: HARARE 08
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. for reason 1.4 b/d
1. (U) The GOZ-controlled Herald newspaper reported in its
headlines on January 20 that the Tripartite Negotiating Forum
(TNF) had agreed to a Prices and Income Stabilization
Protocol. The article noted, however, that the major
sticking point of tying wages to the Poverty Datum Line
remained unresolved and will be addressed by a technical
committee. The three social "partners" - labor, business,
and the GOZ- agreed to meet again on February 3 with little
prospect for meaningful progress.
2. (SBU) Employers Confederation of Zimbabwe (EMCOZ)
Director John Mufukare confirmed to PolOff on January 20 the
substance of the Herald article, but called the headline
misleading. Mufukare admitted that the technical committee
was established merely to avoid the immediate appearance of
deadlock; the social partners in fact had failed to agree on
any substance.
3. (SBU) Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) Information
Officer Mlamleli Sibanda told PolOff on January 20 that the
ZCTU concurred with Mufukare,s assessment. Sibanda summed
up the situation: The GOZ and ZCTU agree that wages should be
tied to the Poverty Datum Line (currently set at Z$17.5
million/month or about US$175/month at the interbank market
rate for a family of six or US$140/month at the parallel
market rate),but EMCOZ claimed that they could not operate
at such levels and wanted the sectoral collective bargaining
committees to set wages sector by sector, as has long been
the custom.
--------------
Comment
--------------
4. (SBU) Comment: Ironically, the GOZ is adopting a populist
approach and siding rhetorically with the ZCTU against EMCOZ,
even as it actively seeks to undermine ZCTU's leadership (ref
A). Complicating negotiations is a dysfunctional
hyperinflationary environment in which what is too much for
management quickly becomes too little for labor. More
fundamentally poisonous to this effort, though, is the
fundamental and comprehensive inability of the GOZ to
contemplate, much less deliver, what President Mugabe derides
as "textbook economics." In this environment the TNF
negotiation exercise offers no prospect for substantive
agreement and will amount to little more than a public
relations exercise by its participants for the foreseeable
future, or as one leading local economist put it, the TNF is
a "damp squib."
DELL
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
AF/S FOR BNEULING
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR C. COURVILLE
USDOC FOR ROBERT TELCHIN
TREASURY FOR J. RALYEA, B. CUSHMAN
PASS USTR FOR FLORIZELLE LISER
STATE PASS USAID FOR MARJORIE COPSON
USDOL FOR ROBERT YOUNG
US MISSION GENEVA FOR JOHN CHAMBERLAIN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2009
TAGS: ELAB PGOV PREL ECON ZI
SUBJECT: TRIPARTITE NEGOTIATING FORUM YIELDS LITTLE
REF: HARARE 08
Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. for reason 1.4 b/d
1. (U) The GOZ-controlled Herald newspaper reported in its
headlines on January 20 that the Tripartite Negotiating Forum
(TNF) had agreed to a Prices and Income Stabilization
Protocol. The article noted, however, that the major
sticking point of tying wages to the Poverty Datum Line
remained unresolved and will be addressed by a technical
committee. The three social "partners" - labor, business,
and the GOZ- agreed to meet again on February 3 with little
prospect for meaningful progress.
2. (SBU) Employers Confederation of Zimbabwe (EMCOZ)
Director John Mufukare confirmed to PolOff on January 20 the
substance of the Herald article, but called the headline
misleading. Mufukare admitted that the technical committee
was established merely to avoid the immediate appearance of
deadlock; the social partners in fact had failed to agree on
any substance.
3. (SBU) Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) Information
Officer Mlamleli Sibanda told PolOff on January 20 that the
ZCTU concurred with Mufukare,s assessment. Sibanda summed
up the situation: The GOZ and ZCTU agree that wages should be
tied to the Poverty Datum Line (currently set at Z$17.5
million/month or about US$175/month at the interbank market
rate for a family of six or US$140/month at the parallel
market rate),but EMCOZ claimed that they could not operate
at such levels and wanted the sectoral collective bargaining
committees to set wages sector by sector, as has long been
the custom.
--------------
Comment
--------------
4. (SBU) Comment: Ironically, the GOZ is adopting a populist
approach and siding rhetorically with the ZCTU against EMCOZ,
even as it actively seeks to undermine ZCTU's leadership (ref
A). Complicating negotiations is a dysfunctional
hyperinflationary environment in which what is too much for
management quickly becomes too little for labor. More
fundamentally poisonous to this effort, though, is the
fundamental and comprehensive inability of the GOZ to
contemplate, much less deliver, what President Mugabe derides
as "textbook economics." In this environment the TNF
negotiation exercise offers no prospect for substantive
agreement and will amount to little more than a public
relations exercise by its participants for the foreseeable
future, or as one leading local economist put it, the TNF is
a "damp squib."
DELL