Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06GUANGZHOU15624
2006-05-26 09:08:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Guangzhou
Cable title:  

Twelve Dongzhou Villagers Sentenced: Government

Tags:  PHUM PGOV SOCI ECON CH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8804
PP RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHGZ #5624/01 1460908
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 260908Z MAY 06
FM AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8947
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GUANGZHOU 015624 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/CM AND DRL/PHD
USPACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV SOCI ECON CH
SUBJECT: Twelve Dongzhou Villagers Sentenced: Government
Sends Message on Violent Protests

REF: A) Guangzhou 11684 (NOTAL); B) 05 Guangzhou 32000
(NOTAL); C) 05 Guangzhou 31940 (NOTAL)

(U) THIS DOCUMENT IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE
PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT FOR RELEASE OUTSIDE U.S.
GOVERNMENT CHANNELS. NOT FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GUANGZHOU 015624

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/CM AND DRL/PHD
USPACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV SOCI ECON CH
SUBJECT: Twelve Dongzhou Villagers Sentenced: Government
Sends Message on Violent Protests

REF: A) Guangzhou 11684 (NOTAL); B) 05 Guangzhou 32000
(NOTAL); C) 05 Guangzhou 31940 (NOTAL)

(U) THIS DOCUMENT IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE
PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT FOR RELEASE OUTSIDE U.S.
GOVERNMENT CHANNELS. NOT FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION.


1. (U) Western and Hong Kong media sources have reported
that on May 24, sentencing was given for villagers involved
with the December 2005 Dongzhou riot in Guangdong Province.
Of the approximately 20 villagers standing trial for
illegally using explosive materials and disturbing public
order, 12 received prison sentences of between three and
seven years. Mainland press also published articles
announcing punishments - albeit much lighter - for the four
main government officials responsible for the crackdown.
Three received internal warnings, while the fourth, who was
originally being held under criminal charges, merely lost
one of his two government positions. End Summary.


2. (U) The trial resulted from the December 2005 Dongzhou
incident (in Dongzhou village, Shanwei prefecture, Guangdong
Province),during which villagers and police violently
clashed over inadequate land compensation, leaving between
three and thirty people dead (see refs B and C). The trial
began on May 22 at a Haifeng county court in Shanwei
prefecture and lasted only two days. Of the approximately
20 villagers on trial (media sources differ on the exact
number) 12 received prison sentences and between six and
nine were acquitted. Of the 12 convicted, one received a
prison sentence of seven years, while the rest received
sentences of between three and six years. Crimes against
the individuals included "exploding bombs," "gathering
people to disrupt social order," and "gathering people to
disrupt public transportation order".

Admonishments for Government Officials
--------------


3. (U) Meanwhile the Nanfang Daily (the Guangdong Party
mouthpiece) reported that the four government officials
responsible for the crackdown "recently" received internal
Party punishments (the article appeared on May 24 but did

not specify the exact date of the punishments). Three of
the officials were only given internal warnings about their
actions. The officials include: Liu Jinsheng, Shanwei
Deputy Party Secretary, Li Min, Vice Mayor, and Chen Huinan,
Shanwei Construction Bureau Director. Only Wu Sheng,
Shanwei Deputy Party Secretary and Deputy Director of the
Shanwei Public Security Bureau (PSB),received any
significant punishment, as he was removed from his PSB
position. (Note: Wu was originally detained under criminal
charges in December 2005. End note).

Western Media
--------------


4. (U) The Associated Press, Reuters, and South China
Morning Post (SCMP) all have covered the story. Almost all
of the articles focused on the discrepancy between the
tougher sentence for the villagers and the reprimand for the
officials. The SCMP article quoted Li Jian - an activist
who helped villagers during the riot - as saying the judges
in the trial had an "utter disregard for human lives."

Mainland Press
--------------


5. (U) Both the Xinhua Central News Agency and the Nanfang
Daily (the leading Guangdong Party paper) wrote about the
trial. The Xinhua article, quoting the Shanwei Daily,
focused more on the actions of the villagers. According to
Xinhua, between May and December 2005, the villagers
prevented a construction company from collecting stone
material, detained and blocked police and military vehicles
along local state roads, and attacked a wind power plant
with explosives. The article accused the villagers of
deliberately attacking the wind power plant because they
knew armed police were on duty. The article, however, did
not explain the context or causes for the attacks - namely
the failure to compensate villagers for land confiscation.
The Nanfang Daily article focused mostly on announcing the
punishment of officials.


GUANGZHOU 00015624 002 OF 002


Government response
--------------


6. (SBU) The Consulate contacted the Shanwei Foreign
Affairs Office (FAO) for official comment, but the Shanwei
FAO instructed us to speak with the Guangdong Provincial
FAO. The Guangdong FAO had no comment.

Comment: "Killing the Monkey to Scare the Chicken"
-------------- --------------


7. (SBU) This sentencing sends a message from the Communist
Party to both the ordinary citizens and security officials
about the use of violence in civil unrest situations:
crackdowns are permissible, but regrettable, but should not
involve excessive violence, while villagers are given no
latitude once they employ violence. Accordingly, the
officials received a light and discreet punishment -
internal reprimand. Even the figure most responsible for
the killing of villagers, the Shanwei Deputy Party
Secretary, retained his party position while only losing the

SIPDIS
PSB-level job.


8. (SBU) the language of the criminal charges against the
villagers is also telling. The sentence was due to the use
of petrol bombs and detention of police and military
officials. By harshly punishing the Dongzhou villagers, the
Central Government obviously intends to deter future
protestors from the use of force and violence by harshly
punishing the Dongzhou villagers. It will be interesting to
see if another Guangdong protest allegedly involving petrol
bombs and detainment of officials (such as the Bomei village
incident, see ref A) will be handled in the same way.

DONG