Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06GUANGZHOU11052
2006-04-11 01:00:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Guangzhou
Cable title:  

Who Let the Dogs Out? Canine Ownership in

Tags:  ECON PGOV SOCI TBIO CH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0130
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHHM RUEHLN RUEHPB
DE RUEHGZ #1052/01 1020355
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 110100Z APR 06 ZDK CTG RUEHTC 6815 1011214
FM AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4438
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUEAUSA/DEPT OF HHS WASHDC
RUEHPH/CDC ATLANTA GA
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 GUANGZHOU 011052 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/CM
USDOC FOR 4420/ITA/MAC/MCQUEEN, CELICO, DAS LEVINE
STATE PASS USTR
USPACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON PGOV SOCI TBIO CH
SUBJECT: Who Let the Dogs Out? Canine Ownership in
Guangdong on the Rise

GUANGZHOU 00011052 001.2 OF 004


(U) THIS DOCUMENT IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE
PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT FOR RELEASE OUTSIDE U.S.
GOVERNMENT CHANNELS. NOT FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 GUANGZHOU 011052

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/CM
USDOC FOR 4420/ITA/MAC/MCQUEEN, CELICO, DAS LEVINE
STATE PASS USTR
USPACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON PGOV SOCI TBIO CH
SUBJECT: Who Let the Dogs Out? Canine Ownership in
Guangdong on the Rise

GUANGZHOU 00011052 001.2 OF 004


(U) THIS DOCUMENT IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE
PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT FOR RELEASE OUTSIDE U.S.
GOVERNMENT CHANNELS. NOT FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION.


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In a part of China better known for
viewing dogs as cuisine rather than as pets, Congenoffs have
noticed an increase in dog ownership. Sales of dogs -- and
related canine care products -- are up and represent a
growing niche in the economy. The reasons for the increase
are varied, however, with one-child households, "empty
nesters," rising disposable incomes, the desire to own a
middle class status symbol, and changing social dynamics
probably all playing a part. All dogs are required to have
a license, but most do not, leading some to call for a cut
in associated fees to encourage owners to "come clean."
Guangzhou, however, has yet to lower its fees, although a
motion to abolish some fees and reduce others has been
tabled -- for the fifth time. Despite a crackdown on
unregistered dogs initiated in Guangzhou in the fall of 2005
to counter rabies and dog attacks, local dog owners continue
to publicly display their dogs in parks and at public "dog
club" meetings. Without overstating the case, it does
appear that the increased spending on pets is a clear
indicator of the increasing discretionary income some
Chinese enjoy and perhaps even growing concern for other
living things. END SUMMARY.


2. (U) Blame it on it being the Year of the Dog, but it
appears an increasing number of Cantonese now own dogs. Dog
owners can be seen walking their animals in local parks;
several pet markets operate around Guangzhou, with puppies
being a favorite item; and Congenoffs have even spotted what
appear to be dog social clubs in Guangzhou and Shenzhen.
Spurred by these trends, we decided to take a closer look at
this emerging phenomenon and what it may reveal about South
China.

From Delicacy to Best Friend -- They've Come a Long Way
-------------- --------------



3. (U) The transformation of animals from pests to pets in
China cannot be understated. For decades the Chinese have
been unreceptive, to say the least, towards the concept of
animals as pets. Considering that just a few decades ago
Mao encouraged peasants to kill sparrows and pets were seen
as a bourgeois decadence, the change is remarkable. While
many Chinese came around over time to the idea of keeping
fish or pet birds at home, other, more high-maintenance
animals -- particularly dogs -- were not as accepted. From
the 1950s to the late 1970s, regular dog extermination
programs were carried out; dogs were seen as a threat to
public hygiene and were routinely executed by mobs. These
scenes were recreated during the SARS epidemic of mid-2003,
when unsubstantiated fears that dogs and cats may carry the
virus led to the extermination of hundreds of animals.
Added to these perceptions is South China's long culinary
fascination with dogs, which are said to be a "warming" food
and good for the body's circulation.

Unleashing a Trend: The Numbers Tell the Story
-------------- --


4. (U) China's National Kennel Club found that in 2005 there
were roughly 150 million pet dogs in China. Research by a
global consumer market analysis group found that the
percentage of Chinese owning dogs increased from 5% in 1999
to 7% in 2004. These market analysts estimate that sales of
dog and cat food in China reached nearly RMB 1.6 billion in
2004 (approximately USD 199 million),up 13% over the
previous year. Predictably, pet food sales are mostly
generated in large cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and
Guangzhou, according to industry analysts. In 2004, pets-
related businesses in China -- including sales of animals,
provision of services, and sales of accessories -- were
worth a combined 15 billion RMB (roughly USD 1.88 billion)

GUANGZHOU 00011052 002.2 OF 004


annually, according to the People's Daily. Experts predict
annual sales of pet food and necessities might top RMB 6
billion (roughly USD 750 million) in 2008, according to
Xinhua.

Why So Many Doggone Pets All of a Sudden?
--------------


5. (U) There are several possible reasons for the increase
in dog ownership. First, one-child households are
contributing to the demand for pets, which might be regarded
as additional members of the family and can become
companions to an only child. The one-child policy itself
helps by reducing financial obligations on the part of
parents at a time when incomes are rising across the nation.
Additionally, when the only child eventually leaves home,
the pet can continue to provide comfort to the "empty
nesters" left behind. Second, many young people, who are
also enjoying increasing levels of disposable incomes, view
pets as a fashion and identity statement -- a middle class
status symbol. The mere fact that they are not saving the
money or spending it in more traditional ways may in itself
be considered an avant-garde move. Finally, as Chinese
society undergoes unparalleled changes, many people rely on
pets to relieve the stress, uncertainty, and loneliness
associated with these radical changes. For many young
people a dog offers the companionship they crave without the
heightened responsibilities a child (or a spouse) brings.

Beijing Loosens the Collar by Lowering Fees...
-------------- -


6. (U) Regardless of the reason for the increase, the
Chinese are raising more pets -- some legally and others
not. All dogs in China must have a license, but because
fees tend to be prohibitive, many people do not license
their pets. Statistics from the Beijing Public Security
Bureau (PSB) reveal that at the end of 2002, there were
roughly 1.4 million dogs in Beijing, and only one-tenth of
them had been registered. In response to this reality, in
late 2003 the capital cut the first-year registration fee
for a pet dog from roughly USD 600 to USD 120; the fees for
subsequent years dropped from USD 240 a year to USD 60,
according to Chinese press reports. More than 40 categories
of dogs deemed "dangerous" by city authorities because of
their size remain illegal to own, however, and Beijing also
imposes a "one-dog policy" that restricts each family to
owning only one dog, according to Hong Kong press reports.

...But Guangzhou Fees Remain Doggedly High, So Dogs Remain
Unregistered
-------------- --------------


7. (U) Guangzhou's "Dog Raising Management Regulations"
first came into effect in 1997. Article 10 of these
regulations stipulates a fee of RMB 10,000 (approximately
USD 1,250) to register a dog, followed by a further annual
fee of RMB 6,000 (about USD 750). Probably as a result of
these high fees, Guangzhou has only approximately 800
registered dogs, according to a local newspaper. The number
of unregistered dogs in Guangzhou, however, is
conservatively estimated by the same paper to be between
50,000 to 60,000. There are currently political efforts
underway to lower the fees, and by extension, to encourage
owners to register their dogs. In March 2006 during the
annual Guangzhou CPC and CPPCC meetings, CPPCC delegate and
South China Agriculture University professor Zhu Xingquan
submitted a motion for pet management that included
abolishing registration fees and cutting the annual fee for
the first year to RMB 1,000 (about USD 125),and further
reducing the fee to RMB 500 (roughly USD 63) in the second
year, according to local press reports. He also suggested
that annual fees for a dog consecutively registered by the
same family for more than three years be progressively
reduced. The local press also reported that Shenzhen City's

GUANGZHOU 00011052 003.2 OF 004


CPC recently passed a "Draft Regulation of Dog Raising
Management," which abolished the original registration fee
of RMB 5,000 (approximately USD 625) and cut the annual fee
from RMB 2,000 (roughly USD 250) to RMB 300 (about USD 38).

But Does the Proposal Stand Only A Dog's Chance of Passing?
-------------- --------------


8. (U) While the motion has been submitted and the proposed
changes are making their way through the political process,
Zhu himself noted, however, that this is the fifth time a
proposal of this kind has been raised in recent years -- the
previous four efforts were never successful in seeing the
motion included in the legislative plan. The draft
regulation in Shenzhen, likewise, is also still subject to
the Guangdong CPC's final approval.

"Cry Havoc and Let Slip the War on Dogs"
--------------


9. (U) The proliferation of unregistered dogs in Guangzhou
led to a crackdown in the fall of 2005. Local press reports
from that time noted that the Guangzhou PSB along with the
Guangzhou Administration of Industry and Commerce,
Agriculture Bureau, Environment and Sanitation Bureau, and
Public Health Bureau, carried out a campaign aimed against:
(1) illegal sales and diagnostic treatment of dogs; (2) the
raising of large dog breeds; (3) irregularities in dog-
walking; and (4) the failure to comply with dog vaccination
regulations. (Note: According to Guangzhou's "Dog Raising
Management Regulations", pet dogs must measure less than 60
cm in length (roughly 24 inches) and less than 40 cm in
height (about 16 inches). End Note.) A Western press
report on the crackdown commented that the Guangzhou police
conducted house-to-house searches and confiscated
unregistered dogs from parks and veterinary clinics. The
report also noted that officials said the cull was necessary
to counter the spread of rabies given that 244 people died
of rabies in Guangdong in 2004, a 41% rise over 2003. Local
press reports on the incident included a police explanation
that more than 36,000 people in Guangzhou were attacked by
dogs in 2004, and between January-July 2005 another 25,000
were attacked. Police officials also said that in recent
years Guangzhou authorities have seized and disposed of
14,000 unregistered dogs, according to local press reports.

Despite the Crackdown, It's Still the Year of the Dog
-------------- --------------


10. (U) So where does this leave Guangzhou's dog owners?
The culling incident of last fall appears to have faded from
the memories of many dog owners -- if not from various pet-
related internet forums where the shock and outrage remains
posted for all to see. Around Guangzhou owners can be seen
in various parts of town publicly displaying their dogs.
Apparently the desire to spend time in the open with their
pets or the yearning to show them off overrides the fear of
having them confiscated.


11. (U) To illustrate the atmosphere of openness, on a
recent Sunday morning, Congenoff witnessed a gathering of a
local dog club in the relatively affluent neighborhood of Er
Sha Island. In an open field, dogs and their owners were
gathered into a group, happily mingling with each other.
While the dogs were of all types -- golden retrievers,
English sheepdogs, King Charles spaniels, and Pekinese --
the owners were mostly all of the "yuppie" type. Many of
the dogs sported doggie outfits, and one of them was even
dressed to match its owner. An organizer soon arrived,
checked off names from a list, and handed out matching
yellow hats. Soon after, the dogs and owners departed
together on two buses and drove off for an apparent outing.
Before the group departed, Congenoff had a chance to ask one
of the owners why he was speaking English to his dog? He
replied that (naturally!) dogs understand English.

GUANGZHOU 00011052 004.2 OF 004




12. (U) An Econoff witnessed a similar scene in an affluent
part of Shenzhen. There, the gathered owners were not of
the "yuppie" ilk, and were decidedly less enthusiastic about
the actual pooches than the Guangzhou crowd. In fact, they
seemed mostly interested in interacting with the other
owners. Still, it was the dogs that provided the common
ground between them. After the meeting dispersed, the
owners all went their separate ways, suggesting that their
original bond came through their shared dog-ownership.

Comment: The End of a Dog Eat Dog World? Not Quite Yet.
-------------- --------------


13. (SBU) To say that dog ownership is a mark of a growing
middle-class would be somewhat of a stretch. Some of the
most notable pet owners we have noticed in Guangzhou are in
fact homeless. However, the increased spending on pets is a
clear indicator of the growing purchasing power of city
residents in China. Where in the recent past every `fen'
had to be used to ensure a family's basic needs, now some
people have the luxury of spending some of their hard-earned
RMB on, well, an animal. Clearly, things are changing for
the better for many Chinese.


14. (SBU) Meanwhile, the attitude shift that accompanies
this increased dog ownership could reflect a larger societal
change; after all, some say that a society's treatment of
pets also reflects its treatment of humans and other living
things. As more and more Chinese -- who no longer must
scrape out their own existence -- can afford the costs
associated with raising dogs, they can perhaps also afford
to care more about their fellow citizens as well as other
animals and, by extension, the environment. In the best
case scenario, today's pet owners will come to see their
neighbors as worthy of at least the same care and attention
as Fido, and thus their concern for their own species may
increase as well.

DONG