Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06DUSHANBE179
2006-01-27 10:34:00
SECRET
Embassy Dushanbe
Cable title:  

COUNTERING NEO-SOVIET ANTI-U.S. AND ANTI-DEMOCRACY

Tags:  PGOV PREL PINR PROP KDEM KPAO RS TI 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4064
PP RUEHDBU
DE RUEHDBU #0179/01 0271034
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 271034Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6546
INFO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE PRIORITY 1433
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 7631
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 DUSHANBE 000179 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR R, P, EUR. SA, PA, IPP, DRL
NSC FOR MERKEL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 1/27/2016
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR PROP KDEM KPAO RS TI
SUBJECT: COUNTERING NEO-SOVIET ANTI-U.S. AND ANTI-DEMOCRACY
PROPAGANDA IN THE CIS, ESPECIALLY CENTRAL ASIA

REF: 05 DUSHANBE 2012

CLASSIFIED BY: Richard E. Hoagland, Ambassador, EXEC, Embassy
Dushanbe.
REASON: 1.4 (b),(c),(d)



PUBLIC DIPLOMACY INITIATIVE

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 DUSHANBE 000179

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR R, P, EUR. SA, PA, IPP, DRL
NSC FOR MERKEL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 1/27/2016
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR PROP KDEM KPAO RS TI
SUBJECT: COUNTERING NEO-SOVIET ANTI-U.S. AND ANTI-DEMOCRACY
PROPAGANDA IN THE CIS, ESPECIALLY CENTRAL ASIA

REF: 05 DUSHANBE 2012

CLASSIFIED BY: Richard E. Hoagland, Ambassador, EXEC, Embassy
Dushanbe.
REASON: 1.4 (b),(c),(d)



PUBLIC DIPLOMACY INITIATIVE


1. (U) Especially when analyzing the so-called "color
revolutions" in Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan, neo-Soviet
authoritarians have dominated the information space and defined
the world view in Central Asia. U.S. Embassies' Public Affairs
Sections face an up-hill battle because Russian media dominate
the CIS countries. In Tajikistan, press circulation is
extremely small, and most newspapers rely on Russian news
services or reprint directly from Russian sources. The vast
majority of the population relies on television and radio for
news and information, and what they see and hear are Russian
channels or else their own state-controlled broadcasts.
Internet usage is growing, but it is not universally available.


2. (U) The nearly universal message from Russia is that the
United States seeks to export democracy through a
destabilization campaign and impose it on CIS countries that are
not ready for it (REFTEL). President Putin's most recent
assertions linking "Western spies" and civil-society NGOs have
only exacerbated this problem. In this warped world view, the
goal of U.S. NGOs is to overthrow legal governments that are
friendly to Moscow to pull them into Washington's orbit in order
to surround and weaken Russia.


3. (U) To counter this disinformation, and to support the
Secretary's vision of transformational diplomacy, we need an

SIPDIS
intensive and on-going public diplomacy campaign that could
include the following elements.

-- Op-Eds by Secretary Rice, National Security Adviser Hadley,
members of Congress, and other eminent people, fully translated
for press and Internet placement, spaced monthly for the next

year or more.

-- Digital Video Conferences between senior U.S. officials and
journalists in CIS countries. Translated transcripts for
placement and Internet posting.

-- Digital Video Conferences between leaders of major U.S. NGOs
and journalists in CIS countries. Translated texts for
placement and Internet posting.

-- Leaders and eminent board members of major U.S. NGOs visit
key CIS countries, call on most senior leaders, meet with other
officials and civil society. Conduct press conferences and
media roundtables. Press releases and transcripts in
translation for all events.

-- Regular fact sheets about U.S. NGOs, civil society, and
political reform.

-- Q&A fact sheets debunking managed democracy and about the
role of NGOs - hard questions and clear answers. (See suggested
hard questions in para five below.)

-- Draw in UK, Germany, and other Europeans to get them, too, on
the offensive to do all of the above.

-- Monthly U.S. Embassy newspaper (as Embassy Tashkent has
proposed) that could be centrally produced (economy of scale)
for distribution throughout Central Asia, or even all CIS. A
hard-copy product is essential.

-- New State website for U.S. NGOs. Would include U.S. policy
statements, short and pertinent summary of each NGO's mission
statement, list of each NGO's programs in individual Central
Asian countries and what they have accomplished. No jargon -
real stories, not the bureaucracy talking to itself. Links to
each NGO's website.

-- Print-product summary (brochure or booklet) of NGO website
for broad distribution in Russian and other appropriate
languages.

-- Make countering Russian anti-democracy propaganda a Public
Affairs Rapid Reaction and press-briefing priority.

OTHER EFFORTS

DUSHANBE 00000179 002 OF 002




4. (S) While overt public diplomacy can play a useful role, it
would be worth considering whether other complementary efforts
should be authorized. These could include the following.

-- Aggressive media campaign through the Russian media, like
www.gazeta.ru , Radio Echo Moskvy,
Interfax, and others, as well as placement of articles in the
major Russian newspapers read in Central Asia.

-- Attempt to gain a presence on Russian electronic media,
especially television.

-- In Central Asia, ensure that editors see the positive
material from the Russian media, and pay them, if necessary, to
reprint it.

-- Counter-press campaign - who is against U.S./Western NGOs and
why. Name names and what they gain. Counter the old-guard
ideology.

-- Write and place positive articles on "Historic Mother Russia
in the Western Tradition," the Russia of Peter the Great.

SUGGESTED QUESTIONS FOR A HARD-QUESTION FACT SHEET ON U.S. NGOs


5. (U) The following frequently heard questions could be
answered for a hard-question fact sheet on U.S. NGOs.

-- What is a U.S. NGO?

-- Why do you call them NGOs even though they exist on U.S.
Government money and implement your foreign policy?

-- You say Tajikistan gets about $50 million a year in U.S.
foreign assistance, but we don't see that money. Don't the NGOs
waste most of it with their fancy cars, big houses, and American
lifestyles?

-- We've seen articles, even in the Western press, that U.S.
democracy NGOs caused the "color revolutions" in Georgia,
Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan. Haven't you sent them here to "export
democracy" and overthrow the existing government?

-- Russian authorities say that U.S. democracy NGOs are really
working for the CIA; besides plotting to overthrow governments,
they are also full of spies gathering sensitive information.
How do you respond to that?

-- To preserve stability, don't we have the right to decide
which of your NGOs to register, to ensure they are working
according to their charters, and to monitor them closely?

-- Isn't the "democracy" you're exporting against our culture
and traditions?

-- We're a young country. We're not ready for democracy.
Democracy leads to instability. Look at what's happened where
there have been "color revolutions." They're worse off now than
they were before.

-- We need economic development, not social experiments. We
want you to invest in our infrastructure and in business joint
ventures. Wouldn't that be a better use of your taxpayers'
money, and wouldn't that help us more?
HOAGLAND