Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06DUSHANBE1654
2006-09-06 08:16:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Dushanbe
Cable title:  

NINE WEEKS OUT: OSCE UNDECIDED ON ELECTION OBSERVERS IN

Tags:  PGOV PREL KDEM TI 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2008
RR RUEHLN RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHDBU #1654/01 2490816
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 060816Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8504
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 1808
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1806
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 1751
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 1803
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 1762
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1692
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 1788
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 1508
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 1527
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHMFIUU/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1321
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 1722
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 1774
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS 1078
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW 0011
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 9909
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 DUSHANBE 001654 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR SCA/CEN, DRL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL KDEM TI
SUBJECT: NINE WEEKS OUT: OSCE UNDECIDED ON ELECTION OBSERVERS IN
TAJIKISTAN


DUSHANBE 00001654 001.2 OF 002


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 DUSHANBE 001654

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR SCA/CEN, DRL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL KDEM TI
SUBJECT: NINE WEEKS OUT: OSCE UNDECIDED ON ELECTION OBSERVERS IN
TAJIKISTAN


DUSHANBE 00001654 001.2 OF 002



1. (U) After a weeklong visit, the OSCE/ODIHR Needs Assessment
Mission (NAM) remains undecided on whether or not it will send a
full-scale observation mission for the November 6 presidential
election. The NAM, comprised of three OSCE/ODIHR officials,
debriefed international missions August 31 on its findings which
will be formally published mid-September. During its visit to
Tajikistan, the NAM met with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
parliament, local government administrations in Qurgon-Teppa and
Kulob, and political party leaders.


2. (SBU) Government officials assured the NAM that Tajikistan
will officially invite OSCE observers. They also told the NAM
that election regulations will ensure equal treatment for all
candidates. The NAM reported it believes the present
administration has people with knowledge and experience
necessary to conduct a fair election if they actually obey
President Rahmonov's call for a fair election. (COMMENT: At
this point, many people at the debriefing looked up and
snickered. Although the top of the administration gives public
lip-service to a free and fair election, the consensus among the
audience was that the administration is not willing to expend
much energy to substantially improve the democratic election
process and curb corrupt election practices, especially at the
local level. END COMMENT)


3. (U) Despite the NAM's positive meetings with the
government, the mission's indecision lies in the legislative and
election rules that restrict competition. The OSCE expects to
send observers five weeks before the election, but the scope of
the mission remains unclear, with the following three possible
scenarios:

-- An Election Support Team with less than five election experts
could be sent to the local OSCE office to assist with monitoring
and reporting. This is the most likely scenario if no candidate
emerges to run against Rahmonov or the OSCE deems that the rules
set by the Central Committee on Elections and Referenda do not
permit a level playing field.

-- A Limited Election Observation Mission would allow long-term
observers for internal OSCE reporting, but no short-term

observers for election day.

-- A Full-Scale Observation Mission would include long-term
observers as well as up to two hundred short-term observers
stationed throughout the country on the actual day of the
election. OSCE/ODHIR would publish a report on the election as
it did for the 2005 Parliamentary Elections.


4. (U) At any time the OSCE could alter its decision to adapt
to changing circumstances. For instance, if OSCE sent a limited
mission but the election suddenly became credibly competitive,
the OSCE would be prepared to train internationals already based
in Tajikistan as short-term observers. Similarly, if it sent in
a full-scale mission, but the government cracked down on media
freedom or eliminated a candidate, the OSCE could respond
critically by withdrawing its observers.


5. (U) United Nations Tajikistan Office of Peacebuilding head
Ambassador Sotirov advocated strongly for a full-scale
observation mission with short-term observers. A full mission
would signal to the people of Tajikistan that the international
community still maintains a watchful eye on the future of
democracy in Tajikistan and might encourage them to continue
election reform in the future.


6. (U) Without a full-scale mission including short-term

DUSHANBE 00001654 002.2 OF 002


observers, the OSCE will not publish its election observation
findings, leaving the field open to other observers, such as
those sent by the CIS, no matter how inaccurate or biased. With
a full-scale mission, the OSCE would provide a legitimate and
thorough analysis to counter those reports. Its constructive
criticism would send a clear message that Tajikistan needs to
strengthen its democratic processes and may help lay the
groundwork for future election reform.


7. (U) During the August 31 briefing the OSCE declared they
would send a mission, but appeared genuinely uncertain about the
type of mission. Over the next several days the OSCE will
analyze the CCER decree and wait to see if anyone will run
against Rahmonov. Political parties will announce potential
candidates fifty days prior to the election.


8. (U) COMMENT: The Tajiks were clearly not pleased with the
OSCE's findings after the parliamentary elections in February

2005. If the OSCE refrains from fielding a mission in order to
send a message that the presidential election is not free or
fair, that message will have little resonance inside Tajikistan.
Tajik media, predominantly state-run and Russian-biased, would
be critical of the OSCE's inaction and could look to other CIS
observers more willing to bless a flawed process. A full OSCE
mission will provide the best avenue for critique of
Tajikistan's unfair election and set the tone for future
elections. END COMMENT.
JACOBSON