Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06DUBAI2819
2006-05-17 14:42:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Consulate Dubai
Cable title:  

IRAN-LIBYA SANCTIONS ACT (ILSA): IRAN-DANA GAS DEAL UPDATE

Tags:  AE IR PGOV PREL ETRD EPET ENRG 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8073
PP RUEHBC RUEHKUK RUEHMOS
DE RUEHDE #2819 1371442
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P R 171442Z MAY 06
FM AMCONSUL DUBAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0547
INFO RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI 3504
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHZM/GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBAI 002819 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 5/17/2016
TAGS: AE IR PGOV PREL ETRD EPET ENRG
SUBJECT: IRAN-LIBYA SANCTIONS ACT (ILSA): IRAN-DANA GAS DEAL UPDATE

REF: A. DUBAI 857; B. 05 ABU DHABI 3440; C. 05 ABU DHABI 3884; D. 05 ABU DHABI

3767

CLASSIFIED BY: Jason L Davis, Consul General, Dubai, UAE.
REASON: 1.4 (d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBAI 002819

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 5/17/2016
TAGS: AE IR PGOV PREL ETRD EPET ENRG
SUBJECT: IRAN-LIBYA SANCTIONS ACT (ILSA): IRAN-DANA GAS DEAL UPDATE

REF: A. DUBAI 857; B. 05 ABU DHABI 3440; C. 05 ABU DHABI 3884; D. 05 ABU DHABI

3767

CLASSIFIED BY: Jason L Davis, Consul General, Dubai, UAE.
REASON: 1.4 (d)

1.(C) Summary: The Iranian parliament is reviewing the contract
to sell Iranian gas to Sharjah-based Dana Gas and threatens to
annul it if the selling price is not increased. One MP claims
an unnamed middleman got an $80 million kickback in the deal. A
Dubai-based Iranian businessman, who claims knowledge of the
negotiations, blames Dubai and Abu Dhabi for trying to derail
the deal with Sharjah, in order to take it for themselves. End
summary.

2.(U) A May 9 story from the Iranian news site, Mehrnews.com,
reported that the Iranian Majlis Energy Committee is reviewing,
with the help of parliament's research center, all terms of the
contract signed between National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) and
the Crescent National Gas Corporation Limited (CMGCL). (Note:
Crescent Petroleum awarded the distribution contract to a partly
owned subsidiary, Sharjah-based Dana Gas.) The chair of the
energy committee said NIOC should either cancel the contract or
change the pricing, and that the minimum price for each cubic
meter of gas sold should be 25 cents.

3.(U) On May 10, Iran Daily reported that another committee
member said "experts" believe there is no need to annul the
contract, although Iran could cancel the deal given the recent
disclosures that an unnamed "middleman" received an $80 million
kickback in the deal. However, he said, if the UAE does not
agree to higher prices, Iran could annul the deal and claim Iran
would not sell at a cost of less than two cents per cubic meter,
as priced in the UAE deal. He maintained that Iran would earn
more by injecting the gas into oil wells for recovery projects
than by exporting it.

4.(U) Meanwhile, Mehrnews.com reported in the same story that a
senior official of UAE's Dana Gas said the week before that NIOC
has reached a Gas Sales Agreement (GSA) with CNGCL to deliver
natural gas by year-end and denied any delay in the pipeline
project.

5.(C) A Dubai-based Iranian businessman who has a shipping
business and claims to represent UAE developer EMAAR in Iran
told PolEconChief May 13 that he has acted as a consultant to
Crescent on this deal. He made a vague reference to the deal
and money and one of Rafsanjani's sons but indicated that the
contract is very "regular" and has mechanisms for price
fluctuations. He claimed Dubai and Abu Dhabi are responsible
for stirring up opposition in Iran to the deal because they both
want to try to take the contract away from Sharjah, without
giving any details. He said Crescent does not know what to do
next because NIOC has never formally notified it of any
problems. He believes NIOC is holding off notifying Crescent
because it has never defaulted on a deal and wants to preserve
its reputation. He maintains the contract is sound and that
Crescent could probably win a lawsuit.

6.(C) Comment: Several federal and Abu Dhabi officials have told
us of their opposition to Sharjah importing Iranian gas (Reftels
B-D). Although Abu Dhabi at one time held discussions with Iran
to secure a similar contract, the discussions did not progress
very far. Given the current international spotlight on Iran, it
is difficult to believe that the Abu Dhabi or Dubai governments
would try to take the contract. The UAE federal government and
the local Abu Dhabi government are fully aware of USG concerns
and opposition to the UAE entering into long-term petrochemical
contracts with Iran. End comment.

7.(U) This message was cleared by Embassy Abu Dhabi.

DAVIS