Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06DJIBOUTI633
2006-05-30 08:31:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Djibouti
Cable title:
UPDATE 3: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN DJIBOUTI
VZCZCXRO0750 RR RUEHDU RUEHGI RUEHJO RUEHMR RUEHPA DE RUEHDJ #0633 1500831 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 300831Z MAY 06 FM AMEMBASSY DJIBOUTI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7257 INFO RUEHZO/AFRICAN UNION COLLECTIVE RUEHDS/AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA 3311 RUEHAE/AMEMBASSY ASMARA 2085 RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO 0117 RUEHKH/AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM 0088 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0593 RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI 2948 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0839 RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA 1521 RHPIGXW/CJTF HOA RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0302
UNCLAS DJIBOUTI 000633
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LONDON, PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHER
ADDIS AND ASMARA FOR CONSULAR SECTION
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AMED CASC TBIO KFLU EAID EAGR DJ
SUBJECT: UPDATE 3: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN DJIBOUTI
REF: DJIBOUTI 564
DJIBOUTI 578
DJIBOUTI 615
UNCLAS DJIBOUTI 000633
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LONDON, PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHER
ADDIS AND ASMARA FOR CONSULAR SECTION
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AMED CASC TBIO KFLU EAID EAGR DJ
SUBJECT: UPDATE 3: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN DJIBOUTI
REF: DJIBOUTI 564
DJIBOUTI 578
DJIBOUTI 615
1. Summary. The Government of Djibouti (GoD) has reported that
results from the previously identified human case of H5N1 may
now be incorrect due to errors that appear to have occurred during
the testing process. The sample taken from the two-year-old girl in
Dammerjog may have actually been mixed up with another sample
taken from a different subject. It is unclear if the other subject is
human or animal, and it is also unclear where the other subject was
located. End summary.
Constant confusion
--------------
2. In Djibouti 578, we reported that an eight-year-old had tested
positive for H5N1. In Djibouti 617, we reported that the infected
child was actually two years old, and that two of her siblings and
her health-care provider and a family chicken were also sick. After
tests on all the sick people and the chickens close to the girl
returned negative, the World Health Organiztion (WHO) and
others questioned how a 2-year-old living in an isolated village
might have come in contact with H5N1. Additionally, officials
were surprised that such a young child recovered without receiving
Tamiflu within 48 hours of onset of symptoms.
3. On May 24, the Djibouti Ministry of Health said that the sample
that tested positive might have been mislabeled. According to the
log of samples, the one that tested positive was labeled with a
name and: "8 months, 8 kg". But for unclear reasons, the
information was communicated to the public (including WHO) as
"8-year-old child". However, when they found the child whose
name matched the sample, they discovered she was actually two
years old.
Questions remain
--------------
4. The latest information indicates that the Djiboutian health care
worker who took blood samples in Damerjog mislabeled the
samples. GoD still believes the infected sample came from the
village of Damerjog, but it is not known which patient might have
provided the sample. WHO and U.S. military representatives are
attempting to identify all patients from whom samples may have
been drawn to retest. Additionally, the child originally labeled
positive has not been ruled out, so she will be tested for the
presence of antibodies. Post anticipates it will not receive test
results for at least another week.
5. Embassy will inform Washington of developments in test
results or further information released by the GoD.
RAGSDALE
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LONDON, PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHER
ADDIS AND ASMARA FOR CONSULAR SECTION
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AMED CASC TBIO KFLU EAID EAGR DJ
SUBJECT: UPDATE 3: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN DJIBOUTI
REF: DJIBOUTI 564
DJIBOUTI 578
DJIBOUTI 615
1. Summary. The Government of Djibouti (GoD) has reported that
results from the previously identified human case of H5N1 may
now be incorrect due to errors that appear to have occurred during
the testing process. The sample taken from the two-year-old girl in
Dammerjog may have actually been mixed up with another sample
taken from a different subject. It is unclear if the other subject is
human or animal, and it is also unclear where the other subject was
located. End summary.
Constant confusion
--------------
2. In Djibouti 578, we reported that an eight-year-old had tested
positive for H5N1. In Djibouti 617, we reported that the infected
child was actually two years old, and that two of her siblings and
her health-care provider and a family chicken were also sick. After
tests on all the sick people and the chickens close to the girl
returned negative, the World Health Organiztion (WHO) and
others questioned how a 2-year-old living in an isolated village
might have come in contact with H5N1. Additionally, officials
were surprised that such a young child recovered without receiving
Tamiflu within 48 hours of onset of symptoms.
3. On May 24, the Djibouti Ministry of Health said that the sample
that tested positive might have been mislabeled. According to the
log of samples, the one that tested positive was labeled with a
name and: "8 months, 8 kg". But for unclear reasons, the
information was communicated to the public (including WHO) as
"8-year-old child". However, when they found the child whose
name matched the sample, they discovered she was actually two
years old.
Questions remain
--------------
4. The latest information indicates that the Djiboutian health care
worker who took blood samples in Damerjog mislabeled the
samples. GoD still believes the infected sample came from the
village of Damerjog, but it is not known which patient might have
provided the sample. WHO and U.S. military representatives are
attempting to identify all patients from whom samples may have
been drawn to retest. Additionally, the child originally labeled
positive has not been ruled out, so she will be tested for the
presence of antibodies. Post anticipates it will not receive test
results for at least another week.
5. Embassy will inform Washington of developments in test
results or further information released by the GoD.
RAGSDALE