Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06DHAKA5933
2006-09-20 01:35:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Dhaka
Cable title:  

IMF PRGF REVIEW TEAM GENERALLY POSITIVE,BUT

Tags:  EFIN ECON IMF BG BD 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKA #5933/01 2630135
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 200135Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY DHAKA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1688
INFO RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK PRIORITY 7837
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 8687
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 9335
RUEHGO/AMEMBASSY RANGOON PRIORITY 2491
UNCLAS DHAKA 005933 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON IMF BG BD
SUBJECT: IMF PRGF REVIEW TEAM GENERALLY POSITIVE,BUT
FRUSTRATED WITH OIL PRICE SUPPORTS AND PACE OF REVENUE
COLLECTION

UNCLAS DHAKA 005933

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON IMF BG BD
SUBJECT: IMF PRGF REVIEW TEAM GENERALLY POSITIVE,BUT
FRUSTRATED WITH OIL PRICE SUPPORTS AND PACE OF REVENUE
COLLECTION


1. (SBU) SUMMARY. An IMF team met with BDG officials and
with donor countries in preparation for Executive Board
review of the next $71 Million tranche under the Poverty
Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). The tone of the IMF
team's meeting and informal discussions with donor countries
was generally positive, but expressed frustration over three
key points: revenue collection, infrastructure and
development spending, and BDG oil price supports. The
overall macroeconomic picture they painted was, however,
generally favorable and progress was noted in some of the
areas of frustration.


2. (SBU) The following major points were developed through
both the informal presentation by the IMF team and the
question and answer period with donor country representatives
that followed:

- GDP Growth. Strong and sustained generally, but a slight
dip is expected this year due to the effect of the mild
drought on the agriculture sector.

- Poverty reduction. New numbers are reportedly coming out
soon, but early opinions are that they will show poverty
reduction over the past five years.

- Monetary policy. In a big step towards accountability and
transparency, the central bank is now publishing semi-annual
reports on policy, available online at
www.bangladesh-bank.org.

- Exchange policy. IMF reported that its concerns are less
now than they were a year ago. Remittances, exports, and
imports are all up.

- Inflation. A little worrisome for IMF, it is around 7%
with money and credit growth above IMF's target range. IMF
reports that BDG policies are gradually tightening, so as
long as BDG continues existing policies, this is acceptable.

- Fiscal policy. The deficit is not perceived to be the
problem; instead, revenue collection is IMF's chief concern.
Bangladesh ranks very low in revenue collection, even among
similarly situated developing nations. It is currently
collecting around 10.5% of GDP, and in five years only plans
an increase to 13% of GDP. IMF targets for countries like
Bangladesh would be 15% or more. Total spending by the BDG
seems to be under control, but some sector specific spending

(i.e. development and infrastructure) is often below the
budgeted amount. This may be due to both an overly
optimistic revenue projection, as well as over-promising on
what the budget can deliver. Next year, the Medium Term
Budget Framework (MTBF) is planned to expand from the current
four ministries, and IMF hopes this will improve efficiency
in the newly covered ministries.

- Banking reform. The restructuring of the state-owned
non-commercial banks (NCBs) is going slower than IMF had
hoped for, but indications in both the local press and at the
meeting are that there will not be a break in momentum during
the caretaker government. One other positive sign IMF
specifically mentioned is the offer to purchase Rupali Bank.
The IMF team thought the price seemed correct and the process
fit and proper. One of the core problems discussed with
respect to the NCBs is the mandated lending to the BDG,
especially lending to cover the revolving credit on oil
imports. NOTE: BDG has a revolving line of credit to
purchase imported oil. The line of credit is repaid when the
oil is sold, however the BDG has not been efficiently passing
along worldwide price increases to the domestic market,
resulting in a large shortfall between the lines of credit's
expenses versus repayments. END NOTE

- Oil price supports. Along with the problem noted above
with the NCBs covering the deficit in import-wholesale
prices, is the fact that BD is lagging behind even other
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in passing along oil price
increases to consumers.

- Tax exemptions. IMF denied media reports that they are
demanding the BDG eliminate all tax exemptions and tax
holidays. IMF does feel there are probably too many of them,
and that a thorough analysis of existing exemptions and
holidays be made to come up with a real cost/benefit analysis
to be sure they are not giving too much away unnecessarily.
This process needs to start now, in IMF's opinion, in order
to be in place for the next budget starting July '07.


- Alleged food staples price manipulation. IMF discounted
recent media reports alleging anti-competitive price
manipulation by syndicates of suppliers and wholesalers of
staples like pulses and sugar. Based on statistical analysis,
it seems that a 7% inflation rate and a deflating currency is
to blame for increasing prices, not a sudden market
syndication. IMF was quick to add that there may in fact be
syndication in the marketplace here, but it just isn't new.


3. (SBU) COMMENT: At this point, it is clear that raising
fuel prices just before elections is politically unpalitable
to the BNP lead goverment. Yet despite continuing concerns
about fuel subsidies and revenue collections, the IMF
assessment team's tone was generally positive. IMF's cautious
assessment may be sufficient to bring the next PRGF tranche
to the Executive Board at its October 2006 meeting. Coming
this close to the election, denying PRGF money would surely
be grist for the political mill and the Board may board may
choose to avoid the political fallout from denying PRGF when
there are at least some positive accomplishments that they
can point towards. The boards decision is important not just
for the PRGF funds, but also because the World Bank often
looks at IMF's macro-economic assessment and decision on
release of PRGF funds as an important factor in its own
decision whether to release Development Support Credit funds.
BUTENIS