Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06COPENHAGEN336
2006-03-17 05:28:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Copenhagen
Cable title:  

MOHAMMED CARTOONS: DENMARK WILL NOT PROSECUTE THE NEWSPAPER

Tags:  PGOV PREL PHUM PTER DA KDEM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHCP #0336 0760528
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 170528Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2120
INFO REUHVV/ISLAMIC CONFERENCE COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L COPENHAGEN 000336 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/15/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, PTER, DA, KDEM
SUBJECT: MOHAMMED CARTOONS: DENMARK WILL NOT PROSECUTE THE
NEWSPAPER

REF: A. COPENHAGEN 00286
B. COPENHAGEN 00207

Classified By: Sandra L. Kaiser, Deputy Chief of Mission.
Reason 1.5 (B)

C O N F I D E N T I A L COPENHAGEN 000336

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/15/2016
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, PTER, DA, KDEM
SUBJECT: MOHAMMED CARTOONS: DENMARK WILL NOT PROSECUTE THE
NEWSPAPER

REF: A. COPENHAGEN 00286
B. COPENHAGEN 00207

Classified By: Sandra L. Kaiser, Deputy Chief of Mission.
Reason 1.5 (B)

1. (C) Summary: Denmark's Director of Public Prosecutions
March 15 announced that he will not bring criminal blasphemy
charges against the newspaper Jyllands-Posten for its
September 2005 publication of the now-infamous 12 satirical
cartoons depicting the "Face of Mohammed." Most Danish
commentators and political parties offered support for the
widely anticipated decision. However, the group of 27 Danish
Muslim organizations that filed the original complaint
expressed strong disappointment and announced they intend to
pursue the case in the European Court of Human Rights.
Danish officials are braced for a hostile reaction in the
Muslim nations which, they worry, will not appreciate the
concept of prosecutor with discretion to make independent
legal judgments. End Summary.

2. (U) Senior Foreign Ministry and Justice Ministry
officials briefed the resident diplomatic corps on the March
15 decision by the public prosecutor not to bring criminal
proceedings against the daily newspaper, Jyllands-Posten, in
connection with its publication of the controversial drawings
of the prophet Mohammed in September 2005. Ambassador Ulrik
Federspiel, Permanent Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs,
opened the briefing by underscoring that the prosecutor's
decision did not indicate a change in the view of the Danish
government. He said Danes would never intentionally insult
Muslims or any other religion. He also noted that Denmark
will continue to try to rebuild bridges in the Muslim world
and hopes to return to the friendly situation prior to the
cartoon controversy. Federspiel noted that on 16 March the
government would propose a number of Danish and EU
cooperative initiatives which would enhance the relationship
in the Middle East.

3. (U) Michael Lunn, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of
Justice, followed with a technical legal explanation of the
prosecutor's decision not to bring charges under sections 140
and 266b of the Danish Criminal Code. Section 140 protects
religious feelings against mockery and scorn and Section 266b
protects groups of persons against scorn and degradation on
account of their religion. Lunn noted that the prosecutor
had reviewed the text of the accompanying article as well as
each drawing individually and found no legal basis for
proceeding with criminal charges in the case. The prosecutor
characterized the cartoons not as an expression of mockery or
scorn of the Islam but rather as a "contribution to the
current debate on terror and as an expression that religious
fanaticism has led to terrorist acts."

4. (U) Although the Minister of Justice has the right to
order further investigation under section 98 of the
Administration of Justice Act, Lunn carefully explained why
the Minister would not be invoking that right in this case.
He noted that traditionally the Justice Minister has only
used Section 98 to direct the prosecutor to begin or
reinvestigate a case when the matter was deemed to not have
received a thorough investigation or new evidence was
discovered. This rarely used provision, intended to prevent
a miscarriage of justice, has only been used twice by Danish
justice ministers in recent history.

5. (SBU) Public reaction to the prosecution's decision
varied widely in Denmark. No comments or questions were
posed by members of the diplomatic corps during the closed
briefing session. Most members of Danish political parties
came out in support of the decision and with hope the country
will find closure in the matter. The strongest reaction came
from the group of 27 Muslim organizations who brought the
original charges against Jyllands-Posten. The group's
spokesperson, Asmaa Abdol-Hamid, shared the organization's
disappointment and noted that they will now file a complaint
with the European Court of Human Rights.

6. (C) Danish officials are concerned about reactions in the
Muslim world to the public prosecutor's decision. MFA
International Law Dept Chief Thomas Winkler told Emboff March
16 that the government doubts the concept of a prosecutor
exercising his discretion to make a legal judgment
independent of political considerations will be well
understood in Islamic capitals, much less on the Muslim
street. Winkler said Danish embassies are braced for a
hostile reaction following Friday prayers March 17.
CAIN