Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06COLOMBO212
2006-02-09 08:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Colombo
Cable title:  

DEMARCHE: PSI ENDORSEMENT BY THE 2/13 2006 ASTOP

Tags:  MNUC PARM PGOV PHSA PREL KNNP XC CE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHLM #0212 0400808
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 090808Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2529
INFO RUEHBD/AMEMBASSY BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN PRIORITY 0013
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK PRIORITY 2885
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0955
RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI PRIORITY 0064
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA PRIORITY 0546
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR PRIORITY 0290
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0751
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE PRIORITY 5617
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2009
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0015
C O N F I D E N T I A L COLOMBO 000212 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR NP, T, EAP, ISN/RA MATTHEW STUMPF, AND SA/INS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2016
TAGS: MNUC PARM PGOV PHSA PREL KNNP XC CE
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE: PSI ENDORSEMENT BY THE 2/13 2006 ASTOP

REF: STATE 10727

Classified By: DCM James F. Entwistle; Reason 1.5D

C O N F I D E N T I A L COLOMBO 000212

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR NP, T, EAP, ISN/RA MATTHEW STUMPF, AND SA/INS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2016
TAGS: MNUC PARM PGOV PHSA PREL KNNP XC CE
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE: PSI ENDORSEMENT BY THE 2/13 2006 ASTOP

REF: STATE 10727

Classified By: DCM James F. Entwistle; Reason 1.5D


1. (C) DCM joined Australian High Commissioner French,
Japanese Ambassador Suda, British High Commissioner Evans and
Canadian Charge' Shea in February 9 Proliferation Security
Initiative (PSI) demarche (reftel) on Foreign Secretary
H.G.M.S. Palihakkara. French presented reftel points,
focusing on the Pacific Protector exercise in Darwin and the
late May PSI third anniversary event in Poland. French noted
that previous Sri Lankan expressions of interest had been
favorably noted in PSI capitals and expressed hope that Sri
Lanka could publicly endorse the PSI Statement of
Interdiction Principles (SIP) as soon as possible but
especially in time to attend the May Poland meeting. DCM
endorsed French's presentation and noted the U.S. commitment
to interdicting WMD and other illicit items was best
illustrated by our recent inauguration of the Container
Security Initiative and Megaports programs in the port of
Colombo. Suda said his government would be very interested
in exploring issues that had previously prevented Sri Lanka
from endorsing PSI.


2. (C) Palihakkara thanked French for the presentation and
stated that Sri Lanka remained very interested in PSI. As an
expression of that interest, Sri Lanka would send a naval
officer to participate as an observer at Pacific Protector.
Palihakkara continued that Sri Lanka, given its long struggle
with the terrorist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE),
was attuned to all levels of proliferation ("For us, a
Kalashnikov is a weapon of mass destruction!"). He indicated
that Sri Lanka had initially been concerned by the "narrow"
nature of PSI's WMD focus rather than an "all encompassing"
approach, but now realized that the principles established by
PSI could be applied to any sort of global interdiction
scheme. As an example of Sri Lanka's commitment to
interdiction and non-proliferation, Palihakkara highlighted
the fact that Sri Lankan UN Permrep Prasad Kariyawasam had
been elected President of the Prepcom for the Review
Conference on Illicit Small Arms Trade to be held this summer
in New York.


3. (C) Palihakkara said Sri Lanka would look carefully at
the report on Pacific Protector from its observer ("we are
very interested in how PSI would be practically applied in a
real situation"),would follow with great interest other
Asian countries attitudes and actions on PSI and said his
government would appreciate more information about the Poland
meeting. He concluded by hinting broadly that Sri Lanka
probably will publicly state its support for PSI principles
"after Darwin but in time for Poland."


4. (C) Comment. We seem to be pushing on an open door and
will continue to discuss PSI with relevant Sri Lankan
officials. Note that reftel points on the AISTOP meeting in
Tokyo were not raised since, according to the Australian and
Japanese chiefs of mission, Japan decided not to invite Sri
Lanka in order to focus the meeting on ASEAN members. End
Comment

LUNSTEAD