Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06CHIANGMAI64
2006-04-05 08:54:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Consulate Chiang Mai
Cable title:  

BAD AIR BLANKETS NORTHERN THAILAND

Tags:  SENV EAGR AMED TH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2621
PP RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHCHI #0064 0950854
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 050854Z APR 06
FM AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0174
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK PRIORITY 0456
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 0020
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU PRIORITY 0024
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI PRIORITY 0204
UNCLAS CHIANG MAI 000064 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV EAGR AMED TH
SUBJECT: BAD AIR BLANKETS NORTHERN THAILAND

REF: 05 CHIANG MAI 68

UNCLAS CHIANG MAI 000064

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV EAGR AMED TH
SUBJECT: BAD AIR BLANKETS NORTHERN THAILAND

REF: 05 CHIANG MAI 68


1. Summary: Air quality in Chiang Mai, always poor during the
February-April dry season, reached new heights of hazard on
March 19 when air monitors recorded PM-10 particulate matter at
double the Thai standard. The pollution is caused by a
combination of practices, including agricultural burning,
construction, trash burning, forest fires, warming fires,
barbecue vendors and vehicle exhaust. The Consulate has made
efforts to combat illegal burning in the area around our
residential housing compound via appeals to local authorities.
End summary


2. Although daily statistics since February 1 show that Chiang
Mai air quality in 2006 has been generally better than in 2005
(reftel),an environmental air monitoring machine inside the old
town and another 7 kilometers out both spiked into the "very
unhealthy" levels on March 19. A rare rain ten days later
brought the numbers into the "good" range for a time.


3. Chiang Mai's PM-10 level (the quantity of particle matter
less than 10 micrometer in diameter) exceeded the Thai official
standard of 120 on 13 days in March. By way of comparison, the
closest Bangkok monitoring station to the Embassy, at Din Daeng,
recorded only one day over 120 in March. Chiang Mai
particulate levels climbed on March 19 to a high of 248, versus
Din Daeng's high for the month of 149 on March 16.


4. It what has now become an annual ritual, the Social Research
Institute of Chiang Mai University organized a conference March
27 to discuss air quality in Chiang Mai and Lamphun. In the
absence of any Thai government statements about the issue, two
speakers sought to raise alarm about the effects of high
pollution levels by citing U.S. Consulate discussions several
years back about possible evacuation of employees. One noted
that U.S. Consulate officers receive extra pay (i.e. hardship
differential) in compensation for the health impact of poor air
quality.

5. In another echo of previous years, Chiang Mai Governor Suwat
Tantipat announced a call center for citizens to report illegal
burning. The call center in turn is to forward complaints to
local administration offices, which are under instructions from
the Governor to order anyone found lighting fires to stop
immediately. Although a similar hotline last year proved
ineffective, callers to date report that the center, set up on
March 1, has been available to take complaints.

6. The Consulate's ongoing appeals for assistance from the local
government to help stop illegal burning near our residential
housing compound in Tambon Ban Waen in Hang Dong district have
met mixed success. After several tries we have received
responses from both the Tambon Administrative Organization (TAO)
and the District Officer (Nai Amphur). These exchanges
revealed, however, that the authorities are strongly disinclined
to take action against anything perceived as agricultural
burning.

7. Ban Waen TAO President Somsak Kanta told the Consulate that
the quantity of agricultural waste was too large for farmers to
compost and claimed that this kind of burning is traditional and
not illegal. An officer from Hang Dong district, Nantawit
Ngeonchaiyapom, said the only complaints have come from the
Consulate. Nevertheless, the Hang Dong District Officer told
all local offices to take actions to prevent burning.


8. Comment: With only the two Chiang Mai monitoring machines
and one in Lampang providing air quality data for the entire
northern region of Thailand, specifics about the sources and
sites of the worst pollution are hard to pin down. Even
without data, however, the extent of the problem is obvious; a
recent flight from Yunnan to Chiang Mai showed a carpet of haze
blanketing the mountains of southern China and the
Burma-Thailand-Laos triangle. Here in Chiang Mai, our eyes and
respiratory systems confirm that the air is bad for health;
local clean air advocates hope that public attention to the
issue will lead to the realization that hazy skies are bad for a
tourism-dependent economy as well.

CAMP