Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06CHENNAI1786
2006-08-11 11:09:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Chennai
Cable title:  

SRI LANKAN ISSUE: CENTER AND TAMIL NADU ON THE SAME PAGE,

Tags:  PGOV PINR IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7930
PP RUEHBI RUEHCI
DE RUEHCG #1786 2231109
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 111109Z AUG 06
FM AMCONSUL CHENNAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9368
INFO RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 1879
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 4829
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 0571
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 1245
UNCLAS CHENNAI 001786 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PINR IN
SUBJECT: SRI LANKAN ISSUE: CENTER AND TAMIL NADU ON THE SAME PAGE,
SAYS NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR

REF: Chennai 1746

UNCLAS CHENNAI 001786

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PINR IN
SUBJECT: SRI LANKAN ISSUE: CENTER AND TAMIL NADU ON THE SAME PAGE,
SAYS NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR

REF: Chennai 1746


1. (U) With the Sri Lankan Tamil issue grabbing increased media and
political attention in Tamil Nadu, GOI National Security Adviser
M.K. Narayanan held discussions with Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.
Karunanidhi on August 9. After the meeting, Narayanan told the
Chennai media corps that "there is complete unanimity on the issue
of foreign policy between the state government and the Center."
According to The Hindu of August 10, Narayanan also made it clear
that GOI would not directly intervene in the peace process in Sri
Lanka.


2. (U) Narayanan told the media that he came to Chennai as Prime
Minister Singh's special envoy to brief the Chief Minister on the
discussions between India and Sri Lanka during the June visit to New
Delhi of GOSL Foreign Minister Managala Samaraweera. In the
discussions with Samaraweera, according to Narayanan, India had
explained its position on ensuring the safety and security of the
island Tamils and about taking steps for the devolution of powers,
while stressing the need for making a distinction between the LTTE
and Tamils of that country.


3. (SBU) Asked if the Center had any second thoughts on the ban on
the LTTE, Narayanan reportedly remarked that the Center considers
the LTTE to be a dangerous organization and hence the ban. "I don't
think the Center has any doubt on the ban on the LTTE," he is quoted
as saying. Narayanan, however, does not believe the LTTE would pose
a threat to Tamil Nadu because "they would like to have the support
of India to some extent." In The Hindu news report there also is a
vague mention of Narayanan briefing the Chief Minister on "certain
security threats that have emanated" about which the Chief Secretary
would take necessary action. (Post will seek to develop more
information in this regard.)


4. (SBU) Journalist sources commented to us that Narayanan's meeting
with the Chief Minister indicates the GOI's eagerness not to let the
Sri Lankan Tamil issue get out of hand in Tamil Nadu and cause any
friction between the DMK and the Congress party. The alacrity with
which the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) discontinued its
training course for Sri Lankan police personnel in Tamil Nadu soon
after the pro-LTTE parties complained about it (reftel) is another
such indication.


5. (U) Earlier in the week, on August 7, Chief Minister Karunanidhi
had mentioned in the Tamil Nadu Assembly that, although the ban on
the LTTE may be debatable, the state government will enforce the ban
and that anyone violating it would have to bear the consequences.
The issue had arisen in the context of a question about a small
pro-LTTE demonstration in the city of Vellore on July 31.


5. (SBU) COMMENT: The GOI's message to GoTN seems to be: we will
support you in articulating your sympathies about the suffering
Tamils of Sri Lanka but we also will continue to treat the LTTE
differently; they cannot be trusted. HOPPER