Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BUDAPEST2005
2006-10-03 16:17:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Budapest
Cable title:  

RAISING THE STAKES: GYURCSANY GOVERNMENT TO CALL

Tags:  PGOV KDEM HU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8357
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHUP #2005 2761617
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 031617Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0114
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L BUDAPEST 002005 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT PLEASE PASS TO NSC - DAMON WILSON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/02/2011
TAGS: PGOV KDEM HU
SUBJECT: RAISING THE STAKES: GYURCSANY GOVERNMENT TO CALL
FOR VOTE OF CONFIDENCE

REF: BUDAPEST 1967 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: POL/C Eric V. Gaudiosi; Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L BUDAPEST 002005

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT PLEASE PASS TO NSC - DAMON WILSON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/02/2011
TAGS: PGOV KDEM HU
SUBJECT: RAISING THE STAKES: GYURCSANY GOVERNMENT TO CALL
FOR VOTE OF CONFIDENCE

REF: BUDAPEST 1967 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: POL/C Eric V. Gaudiosi; Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (U) Following the opposition's strong showing in the
local elections October 1 (septel),Prime Minister Gyurcsany
has announced his intention to seek the first vote of
confidence under the current constitution in a special
session of Parliament on October 6.


2. (U) Alluding to President Solyom's post-election comments
re dictates of the constitution and role of the governing
coalition in deciding the PM's fate, Gyurcsany referred to
"those who believe it is necessary for the parliamentary
majority to confirm its confidence in the government and its
program." Although he congratulated "the largest opposition
party" for their electoral victory, in a subsequent interview
he underscored his refusal to bow to an opposition which does
not always honor the limits of parliamentary democracy. He
emphasized that "the country must be governed" and that the
focus must remain on the future.


3. (U) In his public response to what it referred to as
Gyurcsany's "false and cheap trick," FIDESZ leader Viktor
Orban referred to the local elections as reflecting "the will
of the people" and demanded that the PM step down by noon
Thursday. If he does not, Orban continued, "100,000 people
will come to Parliament" and people will stay in the streets
until the Prime Minister resigns or the coalition acts to
remove him.


4. (SBU) Both the MSZP and SZDSZ leadership have affirmed
their support for Gyurscany. MSZP chairman Hiller calling on
FIDESZ to "take politics off the streets and back into
Parliament ... as we will not surrender to an ultimatum."
SZDSZ chairman Kuncze, who has announced his intention to
step down from the party leadership, emphasized the party's
responsibility to pursue reforms at the cost of its own
popularity. Orban, Kuncze concluded, must not be allowed to
blackmail the nation.


5. (U) Note: Under the Hungarian constitution, a
"constructive motion of no-confidence" must specify a
candidate for Prime Minister. Such a motion may be put
forward by a vote of 20% but requires a majority vote for
passage. Although there has never been such a motion under
the present constitution, PM Megyessey did consider a similar
approach in 2004. Megyessey ultimately resigned in the
absence of sufficient support by the coalition, and his
departure led to Gyurscany's installation as Prime Minister.
End Note.


6. (C) Comment: Gyurcsany's decision to seek reaffirmation
of his mandate reflects his confidence in the coalition - for
the moment - but also his perceived need to prevent the
opposition from building on the perceived momentum from
Sunday's election results. His present majority gives him the
50% required to stay in office but not the two-thirds
necessary to approve institutional reforms, and the prospect
of renewed demonstrations will focus the government on crisis
management rather than reform. If Gyurcsany is sailing into
uncharted waters, he is taking a calculated political risk in
accordance with a process set forth in the constitution. In
stark contrast, Orban appears to have no compass. Although
he cannot stop the confidence vote, nor does it appear that
he will let it stop his present campaign. Unlike President
Solyom, who has carefully detailed the requirements of the
constitution and emphasized the primacy of the rule of law,
Orban is not letting the system constrain his present
statements or his planned actions. There is no reason to
believe Orban will accept the results of any confidence vote
he finds inconvenient any more than he has recognized the
limits of the local elections (septel). Indeed, he is
already ignoring the very real risk of derailing the progress
Hungary has made and the very serious consequences of
damaging the the reforms Hungary must continue. End Comment.








FOLEY