Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BUCHAREST239
2006-02-11 10:03:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bucharest
Cable title:  

ROMANIAN SENATE DEALS SETBACK TO ANTI-CORRUPTION

Tags:  PGOV PHUM KJUS KCRM SOCI ECON SIPDIS RO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3570
PP RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHBM #0239 0421003
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 111003Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3658
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L BUCHAREST 000239 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE DEPT FOR EUR/NCE BILL SILKWORTH

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/20/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KJUS KCRM SOCI ECON SIPDIS RO
SUBJECT: ROMANIAN SENATE DEALS SETBACK TO ANTI-CORRUPTION
FIGHT

REF: BUCHAREST 0111

Classified By: CHARGE MARK TAPLIN FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) & (D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L BUCHAREST 000239

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE DEPT FOR EUR/NCE BILL SILKWORTH

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/20/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KJUS KCRM SOCI ECON SIPDIS RO
SUBJECT: ROMANIAN SENATE DEALS SETBACK TO ANTI-CORRUPTION
FIGHT

REF: BUCHAREST 0111

Classified By: CHARGE MARK TAPLIN FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) & (D).


1. (C) Summary: A controversial vote by the Romanian Senate
February 9 to strip the National Anticorruption Department
(DNA) of its authority to prosecute MPs has created a
potential roadblock to GOR efforts against high-profile
corruption cases, at the very time the EU is scrutinizing
those efforts. It has also heightened the level of conflict
between and within the two major political blocs, with each
side accusing the other of protecting its own members.
President Traian Basescu is expected to use procedural
measures to keep the legislation in play and seek its
eventual passage. However, the issue has led to new
questions surrounding the ruling coalition's commitment to
submitting MPs to the same scrutiny as others in corruption
cases. If the DNA loses its mandate, Romania's ability to
combat high-level corruption will suffer a severe setback and
EU accession in 2007 could be in jeopardy. End Summary.


2. (C) The Romanian Senate, in a surprise move on January 9,
voted to strip the National Anticorruption Department (DNA)
of its authority to prosecute corruption cases against
members of parliament. The vote was expected to be pro forma
in favor of preserving the DNA's role. However, the
opposition Social Democratic Party (PSD),along with
dissidents from the governing center-right ruling coalition,
took advantage of low attendance in the Senate to effectively
revoke the DNA's authority over most high-level cases. The
extreme nationalist Greater Romania Party (PRM) also voted
against the measure. Suspiciously missing from the floor of
the Senate, were many members from the ruling National
Liberal (PNL) and Democratic (PD) parties. Although a number
of them claimed they did not know the sensitivity of the
vote, the media and some Embassy contacts have speculated
that they were absent intentionally.


3. (C) The vote was initially met with relative calm on the
floor of the Senate. However, within minutes, Minister of
Justice Monica Macovei called a live press conference to
express "deep concern" about the Senate's decision, which she
said would be "catastrophic" to efforts to fight corruption.
Her staff also contacted the U.S., EU, and other local
embassies to request public statements of concern. PNL Prime
Minister Calin Popescu-Tariceanu predicted that President
Basescu would reject the measure and send it back to the
Senate for reconsideration. Under the constitution, the
president has the power to do this within 30 days of the
initial Senate vote on a law. However, the Senate again
could vote against the measure or it could adopt the measure
as proposed by the president.


4. (C) PSD politicians provided a range of reasons for the
party's opposition to the legislation. PSD leader Mircea
Geoana asserted to the Ambassador February 10 that the party
"remained committed" to combating corruption but nonetheless
objected to what it perceived as "politically motivated
prosecutions" by the DNA "orchestrated" by Basescu and
Macovei. Geoana said that -- since the vote -- he had been
called by Basescu to consult on the law and the PSD was
considering submitting "its own" anti-corruption legislation
in the parliament. He added that the party had "no choice"
but to react to high-profile investigations against PSD
Chamber of Deputies president and former PM Adrian Nastase by
rejecting the measure (ref). PSD Senate Vice President Doru
Taricila reportedly asserted immediately after the vote that
the DNA had gone "too far, too fast" against Nastase and
others. Another PSD contact, Deputy Dan Mihalache, opined to
poloff that Basescu has used the DNA as a tool to target his
political foes.


5. (C) Comment: After expressing initial shock with the vote
against the DNA, most Embassy contacts now predict that the
legislation will eventually pass. In the words of one
Ministry of Justice official, heightened media attention to
the issue has "shamed" Romanian legislators such that they
will "have no choice" but to preserve the DNA or risk a
negative backlash from the public and potentially the EU.
Indeed, the local EU Mission Charge d'Affaires told polchief
that the European Commission is "monitoring the situation
closely" and will "react strongly" if Romania does not "make
the right choices." The dug-in opposition in the parliament
to the DNA seems to suggest that politicians fear this
institution, unlike its predecessor, could have teeth.
Clearly, Romania still faces an uphill battle against
high-level corrupt officials who, until recently, went about
their business with impunity. End comment.

TAUBMAN