Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BRUSSELS2249
2006-06-30 10:18:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Brussels
Cable title:  

BELGIUM RECONSIDERS RENOUNCING NUCLEAR POWER

Tags:  ENRG SENV PREL BE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7497
OO RUEHAG
DE RUEHBS #2249/01 1811018
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 301018Z JUN 06 ZDK (MULTI SVCS)
FM AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2403
INFO RHMFISS/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 002249 

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DOE FOR NNSA AND NRC
STATE FOR ISN/NESS, EB/OGE AND EUR/UBI

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/28/2011
TAGS: ENRG SENV PREL BE
SUBJECT: BELGIUM RECONSIDERS RENOUNCING NUCLEAR POWER

BRUSSELS 00002249 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: Economic Counselor Terri Robl, Reasons: 1.4 (b)(d)and (g
)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 002249

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DOE FOR NNSA AND NRC
STATE FOR ISN/NESS, EB/OGE AND EUR/UBI

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/28/2011
TAGS: ENRG SENV PREL BE
SUBJECT: BELGIUM RECONSIDERS RENOUNCING NUCLEAR POWER

BRUSSELS 00002249 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: Economic Counselor Terri Robl, Reasons: 1.4 (b)(d)and (g
)


1. (C/NF) SUMMARY. The recent release of a political
party-sponsored study of Belgium's nuclear energy options,
combined with our analysis of views expressed more privately
by Belgian government officials indicate that serious thought
is being given to Belgium's future energy options. Opinion
divides along
party lines: conservative Christian Democrat parties (CD&V
and CDH) favor continued reliance on nuclear power for
electricity, Socialist and Green parties oppose it, and
(economic) Liberal parties are favorable or undecided. A
newly appointed Commissioner on Belgium's Nuclear Control
Agency (FANC) privately told D/EconCouns he expected a new
federal government following the Spring 2007 national
elections, to reverse the 2003 Royal Decree that would phase
out nuclear power beginning in 2015. Comment: It is
increasingly clear to most objective analysts that Belgium
has few alternatives to nuclear, given the costs,
environmental obligations, and lack of substitute sources for
the 55 percent of the country's electricity provided by
nuclear power.


2. (U) A new study just released by the Jean Gol Center, a
thinktank associated with the Francophone Liberal party (MR),
makes a clear break with existing government policy set in
January 2003. The MR is first of the governing coalition
partners in the federal Belgian government to call
specifically for repeal of the Royal Decree. The study
outlines Belgium's energy needs and resources: Belgium is
dependent on imports for 76 percent of all its energy needs,
with 90 percent of those import costs for fossil fuels.
Belgium has seven nuclear reactors feeding its electric power
grid, supplying 55 percent of its electricity, and operating
90 percent of the time. While the country's conventional
fossil fuel electric generating capacity actually exceeds
that of nuclear plants (8369 megawatts versus 5800
megawatts),nuclear is preferred for reasons of reliability

and cost. Fossil fuel-fired plants provide about 40 percent
of baseline power needs, and back up alternative energy
sources. The Federal Planning Office estimates Belgian
energy demand will grow 1.2 percent annually through 2030.


3. (U) In reviewing the disadvantages of nuclear power, the
report covers concerns of operational accidents, terrorist
attack, high costs and long timeframes for construction, and
limited stocks of imported uranium to fuel the plants.
Contrasting with these, however, the report notes the
advantages of high reliability, no CO-2 or other greenhouse
gas emissions, the relatively small quantity of waste, all of
which can be disposed of domestically, and uranium supply
available from more politically stable countries. Potential
costs to the government and the Belgian economy of a
withdrawal from nuclear power are also revewed, including
the job losses and higher coss of meeting Kyoto Protocol
targets. Thesecosts are estimated at 4 to 5 billion euros annually from
2015 -2030, about 1 percent of Belgian GDP, which would have
to be funded. Whie the Francophone Liberal party endorses
the idea of alternative energy sources, the report claims
they are currently 50 to 400 percent more expensive than
nuclear per kilowatt hour. The optimistic target for all
renewable energy forms is 8-9 percent of Belgian energy by

2020.


4. (C/NF) The MR report concludes that alternative
technologies do not offer viable substitutes for
nuclear energy in the near- to medium-term. Phasing out
nuclear power, coupled with dwindling petroleum and natural
gas reserves in Europe, would imply greater dependence on
Central Asia and the Middle East for energy supplies. Given
the party's goals of affordable energy, reduced dependence on
oil, and reduced CO2 emissions, it touts nuclear as the best
available option.


5. (C/NF) One member of the expert working group consulted by
MR report writers privately told D/EconCouns the report
reflects the opinion of many in the government. Pierre Tonon
(protect),a newly appointed Commissioner in the Federal
Agency for Nuclear Control, voiced the expectation that the
federal government will back out of its 2003 policy favoring
decommissioning after the spring 2007 federal elections.
Within the present coalition, Francophone and Flemish
Socialist parties and Francophone and Flemish Green parties
still support the phase-out. Francophone Liberals (MR)
officially favor nuclear energy; MR President and Federal
Finance Minister Didier Reynders wrote the Preface chapter of

BRUSSELS 00002249 002 OF 002


the MR study. The Flemish Liberal Party (VLD) claims to be
undecided, but Federal Energy Minister Marc Verwilghen (VLD)
is known to favor continued use of nuclear power. Verwilghen
also commissioned an energy study, but its results have not
been circulated yet. In Tonon,s view, a reformulated
coalition including Christian Democrats and Liberals will
gain office next spring, laying the groundwork for this
important reversal in Belgium's energy policy.


6. (C/NF) COMMENT: Despite the firm stand taken by popular
Socialist parties (and less popular Green parties),most
serious assessments of Belgium's energy future conclude that
continuing Belgium's reliance on nuclear power is the only
viable option through the medium term. It would be
difficult, however, for the present coalition government of
Socialist and Liberal parties to reverse policy, since they
were in power at its inception. The re-entry of one or both
of the Christian Democrat parties into the governing
coalition would provide a useful excuse to change.

KOROLOGOS
.