Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BRIDGETOWN85
2006-01-13 14:04:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Bridgetown
Cable title:  

ST. VINCENT OPPOSITION CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS

Tags:  PGOV PHUM KDEM VC XL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1384
PP RUEHGR
DE RUEHWN #0085/01 0131404
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 131404Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY BRIDGETOWN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1646
INFO RUCNCOM/EC CARICOM COLLECTIVE
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 1357
RUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM J2 MIAMI FL
RUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM J5 MIAMI FL
RUEHCV/USDAO CARACAS VE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRIDGETOWN 000085 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR AND WHA/OAS
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM VC XL
SUBJECT: ST. VINCENT OPPOSITION CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS

REF: A. 05 BRIDGETOWN 2417

B. 05 BRIDGETOWN 2394

C. 05 BRIDGETOWN 2377

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRIDGETOWN 000085

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR AND WHA/OAS
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM VC XL
SUBJECT: ST. VINCENT OPPOSITION CHALLENGES ELECTION RESULTS

REF: A. 05 BRIDGETOWN 2417

B. 05 BRIDGETOWN 2394

C. 05 BRIDGETOWN 2377


1. (SBU) Summary: St. Vincent and the Grenadines opposition
New Democratic Party (NDP) has challenged the outcome of the
nation's December 7, 2005, election, in which the ruling
Unity Labor Party (ULP) won 12 Parliamentary seats to the
NDP's 3. Charging that voting irregularities could have
altered the outcome in three close races that went to the
ULP, the NDP has held a series of public demonstrations and
dramatically walked out of the opening day of Parliament to
protest the election results. A local NGO joined the
opposition in criticizing international election observers,
saying that representatives of CARICOM and the OAS were not
in St. Vincent long enough to thoroughly observe the
electoral process nor to declare the election free and fair.
Critics, meanwhile, have called for the NDP and its
supporters to accept the election results. The opposition,
however, is unlikely to do so and is sure to continue its
protest in an attempt to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the
Government of Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves. End summary.

--------------
Opposition Challenges Election Results
--------------


2. (U) Citing an "unprecedented level of irregularities," the
opposition NDP has challenged the results of St. Vincent's
December 7 election, which returned the ruling ULP to power.
Despite pre-election predictions that PM Gonsalves's
governing party could lose up to three races for
Parliamentary seats (reftel C),the ULP succeeded in
maintaining its 12 to 3 majority over the NDP (reftel A).
The opposition, however, has claimed that irregularities
could have affected the outcome in three extremely close
races it lost by only 35, 24, and 16 votes, respectively. In
each of the contested constituencies, the NDP cited evidence
of unsealed ballot boxes, the deliberate destruction of cast
ballots, and actions by electoral officials violating ballot
secrecy, which would lead it to formally contest the results
in court. The NDP also reiterated its complaint, first
voiced before the election was held, that inaccuracies in the

nation's list of eligible voters could contribute to
electoral fraud. Both the Supervisor of Elections and the
Government have denied that such irregularities occurred; the
Government admitted there were problems with the list of
eligible voters but denied that these allowed electoral fraud
to occur.

--------------
Election Observers Criticized
--------------


3. (U) The opposition faulted international election
observers from CARICOM and the OAS for failing to be in St.
Vincent for more than a few days, which was insufficient to
thoroughly monitor the electoral process. A non-partisan
NGO, the St. Vincent and the Grenadines Human Rights
Association (SVGHRA),separately criticized the observers for
focusing too much on what occurred on election day and
leaving St. Vincent before the counting of votes was
completed in all constituencies. The NGO took issue with
CARICOM and the OAS for having expressed satisfaction with
the overall manner in which the election was conducted when
they themselves found shortcomings in electoral procedures.
In a statement, the SVGHRA said that the observers were "in
no position to give a true picture of the overall electoral
process" when the nation's "electoral machinery was seriously
flawed." (Note: Two Emboffs from Embassy Bridgetown were
part of the OAS observer team. See reftel B. End note.)

--------------
Government's Legitimacy Questioned
--------------


4. (U) To protest the election results, the opposition's
three MPs walked out of the opening session of Parliament on
December 27 and joined NDP supporters on the street. The
opposition also held a candlelight march and other
demonstrations where NDP leader Arnhim Eustace questioned the
"moral authority" of PM Gonsalves's government. A prominent
NDP member who lost one of the closer races for Parliament
complained at a demonstration that the Government "hijacked8
the election and demanded the arrest of the Supervisor of

BRIDGETOWN 00000085 002 OF 002


Elections. Critics, including the editorial pages of St.
Vincent's three major newspapers, have called for the
opposition to accept the election results and allow the
country to move forward.

--------------
Was the Election Free and Fair?
--------------


5. (SBU) Comment: The opposition's challenge is unsurprising
considering that it warned of possible electoral
irregularities prior to the December election. The NDP
leadership appears to loathe PM Ralph Gonsalves and think him
capable of just about anything. Considering that the ruling
ULP was expected to remain in power, it seems unlikely that
Gonsalves would have found it necessary to "hijack" the
election. It does, however, appear suspicious that prior to
the election it was thought possible that the ULP could lose
three seats only to see the party win three (though not
necessarily the same three) by the thinnest of margins.


6. (SBU) Comment continued: The criticism leveled against
the CARICOM and OAS observer missions by both the opposition
and an independent NGO appears justified to some degree.
Neither organization was in the country for long, nor did
they have many monitors at their disposal. While the
election probably was, for the most part, free and fair, the
presence of the observers has provided the Government with
the political cover necessary to deny that any significant
irregularities occurred.
GILROY