Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BERLIN1504
2006-06-02 16:07:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Berlin
Cable title:  

GERMAN PARLIAMENT TO CONSIDER LEGISLATION

Tags:  KCRM PHUM KWMN KJUS SMIG ELAB PREL PGOV GM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0002
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHRL #1504/01 1531607
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 021607Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3418
INFO RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L BERLIN 001504 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/AGS, EUR/PGI, G/TIP, DRL/IL, INL/HSTC, AND PRM

E.O. 12958: DECL: 6/1/16
TAGS: KCRM PHUM KWMN KJUS SMIG ELAB PREL PGOV GM
SUBJECT: GERMAN PARLIAMENT TO CONSIDER LEGISLATION
CRIMINALIZING CLIENTS OF TIP VICTIMS

REF: A. MUNICH 113

B. 05 BERLIN 4080

C. GOODRICH/CONWAY EMAIL 06/01/06

Classified By: EMIN Robert F. Cekuta for reasons 1.4
(b) and (d).

-------
Summary
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L BERLIN 001504

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/AGS, EUR/PGI, G/TIP, DRL/IL, INL/HSTC, AND PRM

E.O. 12958: DECL: 6/1/16
TAGS: KCRM PHUM KWMN KJUS SMIG ELAB PREL PGOV GM
SUBJECT: GERMAN PARLIAMENT TO CONSIDER LEGISLATION
CRIMINALIZING CLIENTS OF TIP VICTIMS

REF: A. MUNICH 113

B. 05 BERLIN 4080

C. GOODRICH/CONWAY EMAIL 06/01/06

Classified By: EMIN Robert F. Cekuta for reasons 1.4
(b) and (d).

--------------
Summary
--------------


1. (SBU) A German Government opinion welcomed the objectives
of a Bundesrat bill to criminalize clients who knowingly or
recklessly patronize victims of trafficking in persons (TIP).
As a Justice Ministry official pointed out, the Merkel
Government's November 2005 Coalition Agreement supports
implementing measures to compel clients of TIP victims to
come forward. Some NGOs, however, argue the initiative will
actually discourage clients of TIP victims from notifying
police. The Bundesrat bill also calls for the repeal of 2002
amendments to the German penal code that decriminalized the
promotion of prostitution. Proponents of the Bundesrat bill
argue the 2002 measures stripped police of the authority to
conduct snap inspection of brothels. Others argue police
continue to use other legal grounds to monitor, inspect, and
raid brothels. The Government opinion said it would wait for
the results of a study commissioned by the Family Ministry to
analyze the effects of the penal code amendments and other
provisions of 2002 legislation that regularized prostitution.
The measure will now be referred to the Bundestag for
further consideration, most likely after the release of the
Family Ministry study, expected in late 2006. End Summary.

-------------- --------------
Government Supports Criminalizing Clients of TIP Victims
-------------- --------------


2. (C) The German government issued an opinion April 26
supporting the objectives of a bill passed by the Bundesrat
-- the upper house of the German parliament -- to criminalize
clients who knowingly or recklessly patronize trafficking

victims. The legislation was tabled by the Bavarian
delegation and had long been a priority for the Bavarian
Justice Ministry (ref A). Federal Justice Ministry Criminal
Law Desk Officer Perdita Kroeger told us the Merkel
Government, since its inception, had supported measures to
compel clients of TIP victims to come forward. She noted the
November 2005 Coalition Agreement called for legislation
criminalizing clients who knowingly or recklessly purchase
the sexual services of TIP victims. As reported ref B, the
Ministry of Justice has been considering measures to require
clients of a prostitute to notify the authorities if they had
reason to believe the prostitute was being forced to engage
in the activity in late 2005.


3. (SBU) According to Christian Democratic Union/Christian
Social Union of Bavaria (CDU/CSU) parliamentary staffer Joerg
Boehl, a new penal code provision punishing clients of TIP
victims is not strictly necessary, but would give prosecutors
an additional tool to fight TIP. He noted clients of TIP
victims could already be prosecuted for rape, kidnapping,
aiding or abetting trafficking or abduction, or under German
laws requiring individuals to assist others in need. Some
NGOs have opposed criminalizing clients of victims.
According to Nivedita Prassad of Ban Ying, a Berlin-based NGO
that provides counseling and assistance to TIP victims,
criminalizing clients of TIP victims would reduce the number
of clients willing to come forward to help TIP victims.

-------------- --------------
Parliament to Consider Merits of 2002 Penal Code Amendments
-------------- --------------


4. (C) The Bundesrat bill also calls for repealing amendments
to the German penal code that decriminalized the promotion of
prostitution. The amendments were included in 2002
legislation regulating prostitution (see para 6). According
to Boehl, the CDU/CSU supports restoring penal code
provisions criminalizing the promotion of prostitution, but
opposes any sort of ban on the purchase of commercial sex.
He said the purpose of the bill was to strengthen police
authority to conduct snap inspections of brothels without
advance notice. Boehl noted some police officials held the
2002 amendments decriminalizing the promotion of prostitution
effectively stripped police of that authority. Others,
including Federal Family Ministry and Federal Interior
Ministry officials, argue police post-2002 have used other
grounds, such as noise violations, reports of theft or
violence, or suspicions of under-age prostitutes, illegal
migrants, or TIP victims present in the brothel to monitor,

search, and raid brothels. Federal Interior Ministry Desk
Officer for Organized Crime and TIP Gernot Achsnich said
local health and trade authorities in most German cities, as
well as immigration officials, also monitor brothels and
share concerns about illegal activity with local police and
criminal investigators. He said many police investigations
are launched on the basis of tips from the general public.


5. (U) The Government opinion noted the Federal Family
Ministry had commissioned a study to evaluate the effects of
the 2002 legislation and said the government would use the
results of that study to guide future action, including
possible additional steps to regulate brothels. The Family
Ministry expects to release the study later this year. Green
party Member of Parliament Irmingard Schewe-Gerik, in a press
release issued June 2, argued it was premature to consider
repealing the 2002 amendments to the penal code and urged the
Family Ministry to expedite the release of its study.

--------------
What Did the 2002 Legislation Do?
--------------


6. (C) Before 2002, Section 180(a) of the German penal code
criminalized the actions of persons who (informal Embassy
translation) "professionally maintain or manage an operation
in which persons engage in prostitution and in which: (1)
those persons are held in personal or financial dependency;
or (2) the exercise of prostitution is promoted by measures
which go beyond merely furnishing a dwelling, a place to say,
or a residence and the additional services normally
associated therewith." The 2002 legislation eliminated the
second subsection so that Section 180(a),as amended,
criminalizes only the exploitation of prostitutes,
specifically the actions of those who "professionally
maintain or manage an operation in which persons engage in
prostitution and in which those persons are held in personal
or financial dependency." As Justice Ministry rep Kroeger
explained, before 2002 it was not only unlawful to exploit a
prostitute, but also to promote prostitution by operating a
brothel or even ensuring hygienic working conditions.


7. (U) The 2002 law also narrowed the criminal offense of
pimping -- Section 181(a) -- to "impairing the personal or
economic independence of another person by facilitating that
person's engagement in prostitution." The 2002 legislation
also gave prostitutes the legal right to enforce contracts
for sexual services and access to health insurance, social
security benefits, and, in rare cases, unemployment benefits.
(NOTE: The 2002 legislation did not legalize prostitution in
Germany. Prostitution has been legal throughout Germany
since the nineteenth century. END NOTE)

-------------- --------------
Family Ministry Previews Study Evaluating 2002 Law
-------------- --------------


8. (C) According to Federal Family Ministry Deputy Director
General for Women's Issues Renate Augstein, independent
researchers interviewed NGO representatives, law enforcement
officials, prosecutors, local authorities, and prostitutes.
She said the study's preliminary conclusions indicated the
2002 legislation had not had a significant effect on
regulation of prostitution in Germany or improved working
conditions for prostitutes. She said the legislation should
be viewed as only the first step in a long-term effort to
"bring prostitution out of the shadows." She explained the
law was a political compromise and, therefore, only a
"half-step."


9. (C) Because the legislation did not explicitly label
prostitution as moral or immoral, Augstein said, it had done
little to address the ambiguity with which some local
government authorities view prostitution. She asserted most
cities had not changed the ways they regulate prostitution
and therefore prostitution remains largely underground. In a
small number of cities, such as Frankfurt and Dortmund,
Augstein said, police and local authorities formed
"round-table" working groups with NGOs and even brothel
owners to discuss improving working conditions and combating
TIP. In cities that have instituted these round-tables, she
said, conditions for prostitutes have improved. Brothel
owners have agreed to provide better working conditions, and
prostitutes and NGOs feel more comfortable working with
police. Augstein said the study would probably recommend
that Germany change its trade laws to require brothels to
obtain special licenses that will require demonstrated and
sustained compliance with not only TIP laws but also
regulations on working conditions and benefits.

--------------
Next Steps
--------------


10. (SBU) According to parliamentary staffer Sabine Sprywald,
the draft bill will now move to the Bundestag -- parliament's
lower house -- for consideration. After a first reading, the
bill will be referred to the body's Judiciary Committee.
Sprywald did not expect the Committee would turn its
attention to the measure until after the Family Ministry
study is released later this year.

BAUMAN