Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BELGRADE1092
2006-07-07 14:53:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Belgrade
Cable title:  

SERBIAN REACTION TO ORIC VERDICT/SENTENCING

Tags:  ICTY KCRM PHUM PREL SR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5251
RR RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHBW #1092 1881453
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 071453Z JUL 06 //ZDS//
FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8960
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0231
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L BELGRADE 001092 

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D COPY-- CLASSIFIED BY LINE ADDED

SIPDIS

DOJ FOR ALEXANDRE

E.O. 12958: DECL: CLOSURE OF ICTY
TAGS: ICTY KCRM PHUM PREL SR
SUBJECT: SERBIAN REACTION TO ORIC VERDICT/SENTENCING


CLASSIFIED BY POLOFF IAN CAMPBELL U.S. EMBASSY BELGEADE
FOR REASONS 1.4 (b&d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L BELGRADE 001092

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D COPY-- CLASSIFIED BY LINE ADDED

SIPDIS

DOJ FOR ALEXANDRE

E.O. 12958: DECL: CLOSURE OF ICTY
TAGS: ICTY KCRM PHUM PREL SR
SUBJECT: SERBIAN REACTION TO ORIC VERDICT/SENTENCING


CLASSIFIED BY POLOFF IAN CAMPBELL U.S. EMBASSY BELGEADE
FOR REASONS 1.4 (b&d)


1. (u) Summary: The recent verdict of the Hague Tribunal
(ICTY) against wartime commander of Muslim forces in
Srebrenica, Naser Oric, has enraged the Serbian leadership
and public and received widespread negative coverage in
local media. To many here, the Tribunal's decisions -
coming on the heels of widely-questioned ICTY decisions in
the Haradinaj and Milosevic cases - confirm the perception
that Serbs are held to a higher standard of accountability
by ICTY than their Muslim or Croat counterparts. The
decision to allow Oric his freedom after only minimal "time
served" fuels Serbian paranoia that there will be no
justice for their own war criminals and lends credence in
some circles to the argument that it would not be in
Serbia's interest to hand over Mladic. End summary.


2. (u) On July 1, 2006, ICTY judges sentenced wartime
commander of Muslim forces in Srebrenica, Nasr Oric, to two
years in prison on charges of command responsibility.
Since he had already been in detention for three years, the
court immediately released him. According to local media,
the court based its decision and sentencing on the
determination that Oric did not have control of either his
troops or the civilian combatants who accompanied them and
who perpetrated war crimes in the Srebrenica area against
non-Muslims. Many local legal experts believe the
prosecutor bungled the case by not developing a compelling
link from Oric to the actions of his troops.


3. (u) In light of the lenient treatment of Haradinaj and
the death of Milosevic while in prison, the light
sentencing of Oric has led both the Serbian public and
government officials to again openly question the
legitimacy and credibility of the Tribunal. PM Kostunica
told local press, "The Hague Tribunal, which has been
envisioned as the state-of-the-art in global justice, is
transformed into the opposite with this verdict - a mockery
of justice." Deputy Radical Party leader Aleksandar Vucic,
meanwhile, said the verdict "shows the Tribunal's anti-Serb
bias." Editor-in-Chief of the pro-government daily
Politika (and rumored aspirant to be Serbia's next
Ambassador to the US),Ljiljana Smajlovic, compared the
ruling with The Hague's decision to allow Ramush Haradinaj
to engage in political activities while awaiting trial.
She noted, "These are the last nails being hammered into
the coffin of this Tribunal's reputation among our public."


4. (c) President Tadic told DCM at the July fourth
celebration that the Oric sentence was a major problem for
him. The light sentencing of Oric, he said, plays into the
hands of the Radicals, who oppose any cooperation with the
US. Head of the local ICTY office Deyan Mihov was
similarly mystified by the decisions. Normally a stalwart
defender of ICTY, he said it is becoming increasingly
obvious that decisions in the chamber are being politically
driven.


5. (c) The newspapers have been chock-a-block with
reports on Oric's alleged crimes in Eastern Bosnia. Tadic
told the DCM he was stunned by the verdict, since he "had
seen the photographs of the victims" and had visited
Kravica, the site of a January 1993 attack on a Serb
village. None of the press reporting has focused on Serb
actions that led to the creation of the Srebrenica enclave
in the first place.


6. (c) Comment: This decision is a further blow to
rational discourse on war crimes in a country where 80
percent of the population believe more Serbs were killed in
Bosnia than members of any other ethnic group. Even some
of the more progressive elements in Serbia are having
trouble coming to grips with what they see as vastly
different treatment of Serb and non-Serb indictees. This
angst is well reflected in the press, and will make it ever
harder to push the government to do what it can and must to
close the ICTY issues for good. End comment.

POLT