Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BELGRADE1078
2006-07-06 09:32:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Belgrade
Cable title:  

Djindjic Trial Update

Tags:  PGOV KDEM KJUS KCRM SR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0256
RR RUEHAST
DE RUEHBW #1078 1870932
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 060932Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8945
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEAWJL/DOJ WASHDC
UNCLAS BELGRADE 001078 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DOJ FOR CARL ALEXANDRE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM KJUS KCRM SR
SUBJECT: Djindjic Trial Update


UNCLAS BELGRADE 001078

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DOJ FOR CARL ALEXANDRE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KDEM KJUS KCRM SR
SUBJECT: Djindjic Trial Update



1. (SBU) Summary: The trial of the accused assassins of former
Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic is still on track to conclude this
fall. The Embassy's RLA continues to closely monitor the trial and
further enhance the capacity of these special institutions. While
observers continue to believe that a conviction will be secured,
recent events have led to the possibility of increased complications
at the appellate level. End Summary.


2. (SBU) One of the final pieces of evidence to be presented in
court is the testimony of the ballistic experts from Wiesbaden,
Germany explaining their forensic report. While the details have
yet to be decided, it seems likely that the German team will present
their evidence through Digital Video link rather than appearing in
person (Note: The Germans have related to emboff that they are
reluctant to come to Belgrade to testify for fear of political
manipulation. End Note). The defense team has repeatedly raised
objections over the Germans' original plan to simply submit their
report to the Serbian Special Tribunal without giving personal
testimony, as is usual in the German legal system, due to the fact
that the defense would not have the opportunity to cross-examine the
experts. This complaint is largely seen as part of a wider effort
of the defense to discredit the proceedings in an attempt to win
grounds for appeal. However, observers are hopeful that the
solution of the Digital Video link combined with the general
thoroughness and professionalism of Chief Judge Marko Kljajevic will
prevent the defense lawyers from successfully challenging the
court's decision.


3. (SBU) Even absent the issue of the DVC link, it is likely that
the defense team will appeal the verdict to Q Supreme Court
(assuming, as most indications predict, the court returns a guilty
verdict). If on appeal the Supreme Court does not uphold the
judgment, but remands the case for retrial, new complications
stemming from the murder of key witness Zoran Vukojevic on June 3
could impede a second conviction. In case of a different trial
panel that could be seated on the re-trial, a reading of Vukojevic's
trial statement would require consent of all parties, which probably
would not be obtained from the defense counsel. The trial panel
could still evaluate his testimony as important and re-enter it into
the record even without everyone's consent, which again could be
used in the appellate process. Also, the murder has the potential
to deter other witnesses from continuing their cooperation.


4. (SBU) Meanwhile, incarcerated Zemun Clan member Dejan
Milenkovic, aka Bugsy, has stated to officials that former clan
leader Dusan Spasojevic, now deceased, had called for the murder of
anyone suspected of cooperating with the police. Milenkovic also
claims to know who carried out the murder of Vukojevic as well as
the whereabouts of the indictees still not apprehended by the
police. Judge Kljajevic recently awarded witness collaborator
status to Milenkovic, which may prolong the trial for a few months.
The fact that Judge Kljajevic had previously denied the Organized
Crime Prosecutor's application for witness collaborator status for
Milenkovic may indicate that Milenkovic "offered" more corroborating
testimony this time. The timing is also good for Milenkovic because
he will still get the full immunity in exchange for his testimony,
which will no longer be possible after the new Criminal Procedural
Code enters into force next year.


5. (SBU) Comment: In a related case of the assassination of former
President Ivan Stambolic and the attempts to assassinate Vuk
Draskovic, the Supreme Court of Serbia upheld the guilty verdict
against Milorad Ulemek "Legija" (who is also on trial for the
Djindjic assassination). Although Legija's 40 year conviction has
been upheld, he has the right to another appeal to the Supreme Court
because his conviction was the most severe punishment available
under Serbian law. The conviction of Legija in the Djindjic trial
could not extend jail time for Legija because under Serbian law
sentences do not accumulate and cannot be made to run consecutively.
Even with convictions in the other two cases though, a conviction
in the Djindjic case will still be important to provide closure in
Serbia to a recent past of political violence. A failure to convict
would renew speculations of secret deals and conspiracies involving,
potentially, sitting government officials. End Comment.

POLT