Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BANGKOK235
2006-01-12 10:26:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bangkok
Cable title:  

SOMCHAI VERDICT

Tags:  PHUM TH HUMAN RIGHTS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 000235 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/11/2016
TAGS: PHUM TH HUMAN RIGHTS
SUBJECT: SOMCHAI VERDICT

REF: 05 BANGKOK 2839 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Alex A. Arvizu, reason 1.4 (b) (
d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 000235

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/11/2016
TAGS: PHUM TH HUMAN RIGHTS
SUBJECT: SOMCHAI VERDICT

REF: 05 BANGKOK 2839 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Alex A. Arvizu, reason 1.4 (b) (
d)


1. (U) This is an action request. Please see para 5.


2. (C) On January 12, the Thai First Sentence Criminal Court
announced a verdict in the case of missing Muslim lawyer
Somchai Neelaphaijit that is certain to disappoint most
followers of this case. Five police officers had been charged
with the relatively minor offenses of gang-robbery and
coercion. Of the five defendants, four were acquitted today
and a fifth was found guilty only on the charge of coercion.
The court reasoned that since Somchai's whereabouts are
unknown, it cannot rule that he was robbed. His car was
found, and he might still have his personal belongings with
him. The one defendant found guilty was sentenced to three
years in prison. An eyewitness had identified that defendant
as one of the people seen forcing Somchai into a car the
night of March 12, 2004.


3. (C) This verdict is certain to disappoint the numerous
human rights groups and legal associations who have been
closely monitoring the trials progress. The RTG has already
come in for well-deserved criticism for the weakness of the
investigation, which resulted in such minor charges being
brought in the first place. Somchai's wife, Mrs. Angkana
Wongrachen, immediately voiced her dissatisfaction to the
media following the court proceedings. Outside the
courtroom, Poloff spoke with representatives from the Thai
Muslim Lawyers Association, who assured us that an appeal
would be filed within the next 30 days.


4. (U) Post will follow up with a more detailed analysis of
the verdict and its implications SEPTEL.


5. (C) Action request: Post believes it would useful if
Department would issue a statement. If Department does not
plan to issue a statement, post plans to issue the statement
itself. Draft text below.

BEGIN DRAFT TEXT:

The Disappearance of Somchai Neelaphaijit

Somchai Neelaphaijit, a prominent Muslim lawyer, disappeared
on March 12, 2004. Mr. Neelaphaijit disappeared shortly
after filing a complaint on behalf of five clients alleging
they were tortured while in police custody. He was the
attorney for several Muslim defendants accused of
security-related offenses. Witnesses saw him being forced
into a car on a Bangkok street. Five policemen were
subsequently charged only with "coercion" (for forcing the
victim into a car) and "gang robbery" (for the theft of the
victim's possessions.) On January 12, 2006, four of the
accused were acquitted. One defendant, who had been
identified by an eyewitness at the scene, was sentenced to
three years in jail on the charge of coercion.

We are deeply concerned that no one has been brought to
justice for the disappearance and probable death of this
respected attorney. We call on the Royal Thai government to
mount a serious and competent investigation into this very
troubling case, and to prosecute those who committed this
crime to the full extent of the law. end text.
BOYCE