Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06BANGKOK2193
2006-04-17 10:29:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bangkok
Cable title:  

EXTRADITION OF SUWIT PRASOPRAT

Tags:  PREL PGOV CJAN CASC CPAS SNAR KCRM TH 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

171029Z Apr 06
C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 002193 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR L/LEI - J COGAN AND EAP

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/18/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV CJAN CASC CPAS SNAR KCRM TH
SUBJECT: EXTRADITION OF SUWIT PRASOPRAT

REF: A. STATE 58458


B. BANGKOK 2168

Classified By: Ambassador Ralph Boyce for reasons 1.4 (b) (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L BANGKOK 002193

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR L/LEI - J COGAN AND EAP

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/18/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV CJAN CASC CPAS SNAR KCRM TH
SUBJECT: EXTRADITION OF SUWIT PRASOPRAT

REF: A. STATE 58458


B. BANGKOK 2168

Classified By: Ambassador Ralph Boyce for reasons 1.4 (b) (d)


1. (SBU) Due to the just completed Thai New Year holiday, the
earliest Post could meet with a senior Thai counterpart to
deliver Reftel A demarche would be later this week. In the
meantime, mid-level RTG officials have reiterated that their
position will not change from that given to DCM by MFA Deputy
Director General for American Affairs, Mr. Apirath Vienravi,
on April 12. As noted previously, the RTG is unable to go
beyond the assurances provided on April 12 because such
assurances would encroach upon a royal prerogative.


2. (SBU) To reiterate: Post has obtained solid assurances
from the RTG that, should Suwit receive a death sentence upon
his return to Thailand, the RTG will recommend to the Palace
that his sentence be commuted (Reftel B). Post inquired with
sources in the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry charged with
formally recommending a pardon) who reported that, to their
knowledge, no petition for pardon recommended by the MOJ had
ever been rejected. Nevertheless, it is impractical for the
RTG to provide an unequivocal assurance on a matter that is
ultimately the prerogative of the King. Post notes that the
precise wording of Article 6 of the US-Thailand extradition
treaty appears designed specifically to take this particular
reality into account.


3. (SBU) Thailand has been an outstanding treaty partner and
one of the USG's best international MLAT partners. The
US-Thailand extradition treaty is an important tool in US law
enforcement efforts in this region, and RTG cooperation
vis-a-vis this treaty is an essential element in US efforts
to combat drug trafficking. The death penalty is a possible
(often mandatory) sentence for all major drug-related
offenses in Thailand. If the Department refused to extradite
Suwit despite RTG assurances in accordance with the treaty,
it is conceivable the Thai might conclude that the
extradition treaty would be ineffective or even inoperable in
terms of extraditing wanted drug traffickers from the US.
Post believes that for the Department to refuse extradition
after receiving RTG assurances consistent with Article 6
would be detrimental to our relations with Thailand in this
respect, and would have potentially serious negative
repercussions in our broader mutual legal assistance
relationship with Thailand which covers counter-terrorism,
fraud, homicide, and intellectual property rights matters.


4. (C) DOJ and DHS/CIS report that Suwit's citizenship is
subject to denaturalization based on fraudulent statements
made on his citizenship application and in the oath of
citizenship that he took upon becoming a US citizen. The
District Court for the Central District of California noted
in its findings in the Extradition Certification of Suwit
Prasoprat "the Fugitive (Suwit) failed to disclose in his
Application for Naturalization to the United States several
visits to Thailand during which visits the Fugitive
communicated with several individuals concerning the sale of
heroin." The Thai arrest warrant for Suwit was issued on
October 3, 2000. The RTG formally presented its request for
Suwit's extradition on March 16, 2001. Suwit was naturalized
as a US citizen on May 9, 2001. He was arrested in the
Central District of California on/about May 17, 2001.


5. (C) Post strongly endorses the decision to extradite Suwit
so that he may stand trial for the charges brought against
him in Thailand. We regret that we are unable to attain the
specific assurances requested in Reftel A. We are confident
that Suwit will have access to adequate legal representation
in Thailand and will receive due process consistent with Thai
law. We are also confident that the RTG will stand by its
assurances to recommend a pardon if Suwit is ultimately
convicted and subsequently sentenced to death. Although we
understand that this is a determination for the Department to
make, we believe the consequences of violating the highly
successful US-Thailand extradition treaty outweigh
considerably the risk of extraditing Suwit to stand trial in
Thailand.
BOYCE