Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06ANKARA581
2006-02-09 14:30:00
SECRET
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

UNHCR TURKEY READY TO ENGAGE ON MAKHMOUR

Tags:  PREF EAID SOCI PHUM PREL PTER IZ TU UNHCR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1453
OO RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHIHL RUEHKUK RUEHMOS
DE RUEHAK #0581/01 0401430
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 091430Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3066
INFO RUCNRAQ/IRAQ COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE IMMEDIATE
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5// IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC//USDP:PDUSDP/ISA:EUR/ISA:NESA// IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/425ABS IZMIR TU//CC// IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/39ABG INCIRLIK AB TU// IMMEDIATE
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000581 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT ALSO FOR PRM/ANE LIANA BROOKS-RUBIN
AMMAN ALSO FOR REFCOORD CLAIRE KANESHIRO
CAIRO ALSO FOR REFCOORD GERRY CHEYNE
BAGHDAD ALSO FOR REFCOORD CAMILLE HILL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/07/2026
TAGS: PREF EAID SOCI PHUM PREL PTER IZ TU UNHCR
SUBJECT: UNHCR TURKEY READY TO ENGAGE ON MAKHMOUR

REF: A. BAGHDAD 371

B. BAGHDAD 358

C. MAKHMOUR IWG MEMO 1/4/06

Classified By: Counselor for Political-Military Affairs Timothy A. Bett
s for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

Summary
-------

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000581

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT ALSO FOR PRM/ANE LIANA BROOKS-RUBIN
AMMAN ALSO FOR REFCOORD CLAIRE KANESHIRO
CAIRO ALSO FOR REFCOORD GERRY CHEYNE
BAGHDAD ALSO FOR REFCOORD CAMILLE HILL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/07/2026
TAGS: PREF EAID SOCI PHUM PREL PTER IZ TU UNHCR
SUBJECT: UNHCR TURKEY READY TO ENGAGE ON MAKHMOUR

REF: A. BAGHDAD 371

B. BAGHDAD 358

C. MAKHMOUR IWG MEMO 1/4/06

Classified By: Counselor for Political-Military Affairs Timothy A. Bett
s for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

Summary
--------------


1. (S) UNHCR's Turkey office is ready to get to work on
voluntary repatriation or local integration for residents of
the Makhmour Camp in northern Iraq. However, the
UNHCR-Turkey Representative pointed out obstacles to be
overcome, such as accessing villages in southeast Turkey to
which Makhmour residents might return, renegotiating the
Tripartite Agreement from 2004, and security and funding for
the overall mission. UNHCR emphasized that its main goal is
durable solutions for refugees, not meeting Turkey's
counterterrorism agenda. PKK violence in southeast Turkey
will complicate this operation, but Turkey should have a
strong incentive to make it work. End summary.

UNHCR Turkey Stands Ready...
--------------


2. (S) We met Feb. 8 with Gesche Karrenbrock, UNHCR's
Representative in Turkey, to discuss USG/UNHCR planning for
durable solutions for the residents of Makhmour Refugee Camp
in northern Iraq, with an eye to closing the camp in order to
deprive the terrorist group PKK from using the base for
logistical support (see ref c). Karrenbrock said that UNHCR
stands ready to play its role toward completing this plan,
but noted obstacles that need to be overcome.

...But Obstacles Remain
--------------


3. (S) Karrenbrock noted that -- due to security concerns
since the resumption of PKK violence in mid-2004 -- UNHCR has
been unable to visit villages which many Makhmour residents
fled in the mid-1990s. While GOT authorities in Ankara
assured UNHCR that Turkish security forces would ensure their

safety, in fact the security forces only escorted the UNHCR
workers to the outskirts of these villages, telling UNHCR
they were on their own after that. The UNHCR workers,
concerned for their safety, did not proceed further. Thus
UNHCR is currently unable to provide the Makhmour residents a
fair assessment of the situation in their home village. The
worsening security situation in the southeast will only make
UNHCR's efforts to assess these villages more difficult,
absent a more concrete guarantee of security from the GOT.
Karrenbrock further noted that UNHCR has imperfect
information on the home villages of many residents; it only
has the village of birth of the residents, which may not be
the same in many cases as the village they abandoned in the
1990s.

Resurrect the Tripartite Agreement
--------------


4. (S) Karrenbrock recommended that UNHCR, the GOT, and GOI
(after it forms) use the Tripartite Agreement negotiated in
2003-04 as the basis for reaching agreement on Makhmour, with
the understanding that all three sides may wish to reopen
certain provisions for discussion. She suggested that the
USG role might be somewhat more limited this time given the
sovereign nature of the Iraqi government. (COMMENT: We
believe Turkey will want the USG to have some role in these
negotiations. END COMMENT) Given the shortness of time and
the fact the GOI formation may take some time, she expressed
an interest in approaching the GOT -- at least informally --
as soon as possible to look into reviving the Tripartite
Agreement.

Concerns About the GOT Agenda
--------------

ANKARA 00000581 002 OF 002




5. (S) Karrenbrock expressed concern that the Turkish MFA has
shifted responsibility for the Makhmour issue from the
directorate responsible for international organizations to
the Security Affairs Directorate (roughly our S/CT
equivalent). She emphasized that the GOT's main objective is
to close Makhmour Camp, while UNHCR's main objective is to
find durable solutions for Turkish refugees in Iraq. She
worried that the Turkish MFA, by moving this portfolio, was
placing the wrong emphasis on tough counterterrorism measures
as opposed to seeking ways to welcome back refugees to
Turkey. UNHCR must be seen as an impartial player, not as a
counterterrorism tool of the GOT. Otherwise, UNHCR workers
in Makhmour could be targeted by the PKK. We responded that
the USG shares both objectives, and sees finding durable
slutions as a valuable goal, while closure of th camp also
serves to counter terrorism, a key objective. We encouraged
Karrenbrock to be clear about her mission with all sides.

Security and Funding Issues
--------------


6. (S) Karrenbrock asked for clarification on who will
provide security in and around Makhmour to ensure the PKK
cannot intimidate either camp residents or UNHCR workers. We
replied that we did not know much about specifics, but that
this was a topic on the agenda for the USG/UNHCR meeting in
Amman on Feb. 22.


7. (S) Finally, Karrenbrock asked if the USG was considering
providing funding to assist UNHCR with this mission. Again,
we surmised this would be a topic for the Amman meeting later
this month.

Comment: We Can Work It Out
--------------


8. (S) Karrenbrock was in her position when the original
Tripartite Agreement on Makhmour was negotiated in 2003-04,
and recalled the GOT negotiators were quite tough. She
wondered what the GOT's attitude will be in the current
climate toward assuring a safe and unharassed return for
Makhmour's residents. At the time of the negotiations, PKK
violence in Turkey was almost nil. In the intervening two
years, however, the situation in the southeast has become
more dangerous, which may lead the GOT to treat the returnees
(many of them may be sympathetic to the PKK) harshly.
However, renewed PKK violence only increases the GOT's desire
to deprive the PKK of the use of Makhmour. Additionally,
both the USG and GOT will see the camp's closure as a
deliverable in our mutual cooperation against the PKK. Thus
the GOT has an incentive to make the necessary assurances to
UNHCR. END COMMENT.
WILSON