Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06ANKARA5793
2006-10-05 07:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

183 NON-MUSLIM LEADERS ISSUE STATEMENT PROTESTING

Tags:  PGOV PHUM PREL OSCE TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0365
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHAK #5793/01 2780756
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 050756Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9206
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKDAI/DIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5//
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU//TCH//
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEUITH/TLO ANKARA TU
RUEHAK/TSR ANKARA TU
RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 005793 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/05/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL OSCE TU
SUBJECT: 183 NON-MUSLIM LEADERS ISSUE STATEMENT PROTESTING
GOVERNMENT'S TREATMENT OF MINORITIES

REF: A. ANK 2750


B. IST 1711

Classified By: Political Counselor Janice G. Weiner; reasons 1.4(b),(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 005793

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/05/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL OSCE TU
SUBJECT: 183 NON-MUSLIM LEADERS ISSUE STATEMENT PROTESTING
GOVERNMENT'S TREATMENT OF MINORITIES

REF: A. ANK 2750


B. IST 1711

Classified By: Political Counselor Janice G. Weiner; reasons 1.4(b),(d)


1. (C) Summary: On September 25, 183 non-Muslim minority
Turkish citizens, including many intellectuals and writers,
issued a first-ever joint statement protesting the
government's treatment of minorities. The statement came in
the wake of contentious parliamentary committee debate over
EU harmonization legislation designed to expand the rights of
non-Muslim minorities. During the debate, the ruling Justice
and Development Party (AKP) and main opposition Republican
People's Party (CHP) positioned themselves to avoid offending
nationalist-minded voters, and minority groups felt ignored.
Their statement reflects continued frustration over what they
see as government talk of reform with less than meaningful
action. End summary.

-------------- --------------
Parties Clash Over Laws Expanding Minority Rights
-------------- --------------


2. (U) During the week of September 18, parliamentary
committees debated two sensitive laws that are part of the
so-called 9th Reform Package: The Foundations Law and the
Private Education Institutions Law (the "Education Law").
The Foundations Law would give minorities (generally defined
as Greeks, Armenians, and Jews, per the Lausanne Treaty)
increased control over their affairs and property, and
facilitate the return of foundation properties previously
seized by the government (see ref A). The Education Law
seeks to clarify the definitions of private, minority, and
foreign schools. It also contains an amendment that, if
passed, would allow non-citizens who reside in Turkey to send
their children to minority schools.


3. (U) During committee debate on both bills, CHP members
argued that both laws violated the "reciprocity" principle of
the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne by creating rights for
non-Muslims in Turkey without requiring the Government of
Greece to enact similar, reciprocal reforms with respect to

its Muslim minority. The CHP stated that it was particularly
alarmed that the amendment to the Education Law would set the
"dangerous" precedent of allowing the Greek Orthodox Halki
Seminary to be reopened. Such a hard-line stance is in
lock-step with CHP's continuous efforts to attract the
nationalist vote by tripping up AKP's EU-related reform
efforts (see ref B).


4. (U) The AKP, in response, tried to bolster its own
nationalist bona fides. PM Erdogan stated that the
provisions were required by the EU, and that the government
would not begin implementation until the Greek government
acted in a reciprocal nature by allowing the building of a
mosque in Athens and allowing western Thrace Turks to elect
their own muftis. Ultimately, the AKP removed the
controversial -- but potentially significant -- amendment to
the Education Law, and parliament passed a mostly procedural
bill that did little to expand minority rights. The
Foundations Law emerged from committee on October 3.

--------------
Minorities Ask To Be Treated As Full Citizens
--------------


5. (U) During these debates, several minority communities
expressed to the press their belief that the GOT's efforts
constituted a disingenuous attempt to appease the EU, rather
than a genuine effort to improve the situation of minorities.
Viewing themselves as pawns being used by political parties
to further their respective political agendas, 183
representatives from these communities for the first time in
history signed and released a joint statement of protest, the
translated text of which follows:

-Begin text: We deplore both the governing party -- which
ignored until now our requests about our citizenship rights
and problems but without any restraint admitted that it was
taking these up out of necessity because of the EU admission
issue -- and similarly the opposition -- which did not

ANKARA 00005793 002 OF 002


contribute at all to the resolution of our problems. During
the debates on some laws that we doubt will bring solutions
to our problems, we would like to remind those who demand
"reciprocity and admit at the parliament that we were
regarded as hostages, that what they are imagining is not a
democratic Republican order. Those of us who are the
non-Muslim citizens of the Republic of Turkey and whose
signatures can be found below, invite the government and the
opposition to absorb the democratic Republic and act
accordingly. End text.


6. (C) Comment: The first-ever joint public statement
reflects the discontent and continuing frustration felt by
Turkey's minority communities over the pace of reforms since
the EU negotiation process began last year. They see the
recently-passed Education Law as ineffectual and the GOT's
failure to date to pass a new Foundations Law as an example
of the government's unwillingness to grant additional
minority rights, despite its contrary claims to the EU. This
highlights that the importance of the nationalist vote in the
2007 elections will make it difficult politically for the AKP
to push through significant reforms called for by minority
communities, such as returning confiscated foundation
property, reopening Halki Seminary, or allowing non-citizens
to attend minority schools. The AKP has sufficient votes in
parliament but -- absent a let-up in nationalist appeal --
may lack the political will for the fight, even if their
commitment to the EU accession process is called into
question. End comment.

Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/

WILSON