Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06ANKARA5259
2006-09-13 12:24:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

OPPOSITION DEPUTIES SLAM U.S., ISRAEL DURING

Tags:  PREL PGOV LE TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1705
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHAK #5259/01 2561224
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 131224Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8579
INFO RUEHXK/ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 1799
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5// PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEUITH/TLO ANKARA TU PRIORITY
RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 005259 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/10/2021
TAGS: PREL PGOV LE TU
SUBJECT: OPPOSITION DEPUTIES SLAM U.S., ISRAEL DURING
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE ON TURKEY'S UNIFIL CONTRIBUTION

REF: ANKARA 5149

Classified By: Political Counselor Janice G. Weiner for reasons 1.4(b),
(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 005259

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/10/2021
TAGS: PREL PGOV LE TU
SUBJECT: OPPOSITION DEPUTIES SLAM U.S., ISRAEL DURING
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE ON TURKEY'S UNIFIL CONTRIBUTION

REF: ANKARA 5149

Classified By: Political Counselor Janice G. Weiner for reasons 1.4(b),
(d)


1. (C) Opposition deputies launched virulent attacks against
the US and Israel during the September 5 Turkish
parliamentary debate on Turkey's troop deployment to Lebanon.
The motion passed (reftel A) and the GOT is readying Turkish
troops to join the UNIFIL mission, but the force and tenor of
some of the deputies' statements set an ugly tone as Turkey
approaches national elections in 2007.


2. (C) In repeated statements during the parliamentary
debate, opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) deputies
heatedly branded the clash in Lebanon as part of a
US-orchestrated effort to create a "new Middle East".
Several MPs mischaracterized the Secretary's July comments on
the subject as intended to foment war and impose a new order
through blood and massacre that brought destruction and
injustice to the region.


3. (C) PM Erdogan's ruling Justice and Development Party
(AKP) was excoriated by several opposition MPs for, in their
words, obsequiously doing America's and Israel's dirty
business by sending troops which could be forced to act
against fellow Muslims in Lebanon. Rather than defend the
interests of the US and Israel, they challenged AKP to stand
up to the US and send troops to combat PKK terrorists based
in Northern Iraq. As CHP Istanbul deputy Onur Oymen (a
former Turkish Ambassador to NATO) put it, "The US wants us
to send troops. Which US? The US that obstructs you from
sending troops to northern Iraq against the PKK." CHP Ankara
Deputy Bayram Meral charged President Bush with demolishing
Lebanon, destroying Iraq and feeding terrorists in northern
Iraq. "If you are Muslim, why are you going to Lebanon?"
Meral demanded. "Who are you siding with? With Israel. Who
wants this? The US."


4. (C) Attacks of almost equal ferocity were hurled against
Israel. One particularly inflamed diatribe came from Sukru
Elekdag, a CHP deputy from Istanbul (and a former Turkish
Ambassador to the US). He warned of Israeli hawks' strategy
to divide Muslim countries that pose a threat to Israel on

the basis of ethnicity and religious sects, via politics or
bribery. One of Israel's basic objectives, Elekdag alleged,
is to divide Iraq into three parts and establish an
independent Kurdish state that would enter into partnership
with Israel.


5. (C) MPs also linked purported US and Israeli ambitions.
The US administration has integrated Israel's security
interests into its National Security Strategy and the
"Greater Middle East Project," Elekdag claimed, because it
sees the world as democratic Christians and Jews against
Islamist fascist Muslims. After "liquidating" Hizbullah in
Lebanon, the US and Israel will go after Syria and Iran.
Contributing troops to a UN force -- a tool to impose the
Israel-US strategy on the region -- makes Turkey complicit in
US-Israeli efforts to reshape the Middle East by brutally
pursuing US-Israeli interests at the expense of law and
justice. While Elekdag noted that a primary goal of CHP's
foreign policy has been cooperation with and mutual respect
for the US and support for relations with Israel, he railed
against UNSC Resolution 1701 as an effort to brutally change
the political and ideological map of the Middle East that
will set Turkey in the US-Israeli camp against Hizbullah,
Syria and Iran. Several deputies echoed the pronouncement of
center-right Motherland Party leader Erkan Mumcu, "This
nation does not have sons to send away for the security of
Israel."


6. (C) Deputies from the governing pro-Islam AKP parried the
opposition onslaught, reiterating Turkey's regional
importance and national interest in a stable Middle East.
Erdogan's advisor Egemen Bagis, despite catcalls about his
close ties to the US and Israel, emphasized that Turkey has a
moral, political and historical duty towards Lebanon and
could not remain a spectator while Lebanese citizens are
suffering. FM Gul, in his comments, noted that the GOT had

ANKARA 00005259 002 OF 002


listened to the criticism and had conditioned Turkey's UNIFIL
participation on serving as support for humanitarian efforts.
He praised Turkish forces as capable of fulfilling the task
and urged all deputies to stand behind the military once
soldiers deployed. AKP Konya deputy Ahmet Isik also took the
floor, noting that it is in Turkey's interest to preserve
peace in Lebanon and the Middle East. Since EU countries
will provide a substantial portion of the UNIFIL force, Isik
added, Turkey, as an aspiring EU member, should contribute as
well.


7. (C) Comment. That the opposition deputies launched a
spirited attack against the ruling party's motion to deploy
troops abroad came as no surprise, given their strategy of
opposing the AKP at every opportunity. What is unsettling is
their willingness to use anti-American and anti-Israel
rhetoric as a weapon against the government that feeds an
already bristling public opinion. The fervor of their
attacks, which practically jumped out of television screens
during the debate, was noteworthy. Post is engaging with
opinion-makers where possible to counter these attacks. We
are likely to see more atmospherics of this nature as the
election season gets underway. End comment.

Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/

WILSON