Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06ANKARA5001
2006-08-29 16:10:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:
TERRORISM FINANCE: TURKISH MFA DOWNPLAYS IMPACT OF
VZCZCXYZ0002 RR RUEHWEB DE RUEHAK #5001 2411610 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 291610Z AUG 06 FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8276 INFO RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN 0323 RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH 0609 RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL 1173 RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 005001
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2011
TAGS: KTFN PTER TU
SUBJECT: TERRORISM FINANCE: TURKISH MFA DOWNPLAYS IMPACT OF
PRO-AL-QADI COURT RULING
REF: A. ANKARA 4266
B. RIYADH 6666
C. RIYADH 6729
Classified By: Economic Counselor Thomas Goldberger for
reasons 1.4(b) and (d).
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 005001
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2011
TAGS: KTFN PTER TU
SUBJECT: TERRORISM FINANCE: TURKISH MFA DOWNPLAYS IMPACT OF
PRO-AL-QADI COURT RULING
REF: A. ANKARA 4266
B. RIYADH 6666
C. RIYADH 6729
Classified By: Economic Counselor Thomas Goldberger for
reasons 1.4(b) and (d).
1. (C) Turkish MFA Deputy Director General for
Security Affairs Huseyin Bicakli told us August 29 that the
Foreign Ministry and the Finance Ministry would
appeal the Danistay (Council of State) July 20
ruling (ref a) that vacated the Council of Ministers
decree freezing al-Qadi's assets in Turkey.
Bicakli said he was 90% sure the Prime Ministry would join
the two other ministries in filing the appeal. He
said the court deadline for an appeal was September 4. For
now, he confirmed that al-Qadi's assets remain frozen in
Turkey. He noted that there were at least two more levels of
appeal available.
2. (C) Bicakli said the court ruling was based on the
merits of the al-Qadi file itself and did not overturn the
Government's practice of using Council of Minister decrees
to enforce UN 1267 committee designations. Other contacts
have contradicted Bicakli on this last point, telling us
that the Danistay ruling means that a court decision will
be needed from now on to freeze assets. Bicakli, however,
was unusually emphatic, and he is both relatively senior
and directly responsible for Turkey's compliance with
Security Council terrorism resolutions. We will seek
additional confirmation of this point.
3. (C) Comment: The likelihood of the Prime Ministry adding
its weight to the Government,s appeal is notable given the
Prime Minister,s favorable comments about al-Qadi as
reported in the Turkish press. It would seem to show that
Erdogan,s remarks do not reflect official policy and were likely a
spontaneous and ill-considered response to the opposition,s
use of the al-Qadi issue as a political club against the AKP
government. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that
Turkey,s hyper-secularist courts -- at knives drawn with the
AKP on nearly every issue -- would have colluded with the AKP to
release a terrorist financier,s assets. The court,s
initial ruling more likely reflects the weakness of Turkey,s legal
tools to combat terrorism financing, an issue we are pursuing
in many channels.
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/
WILSON
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2011
TAGS: KTFN PTER TU
SUBJECT: TERRORISM FINANCE: TURKISH MFA DOWNPLAYS IMPACT OF
PRO-AL-QADI COURT RULING
REF: A. ANKARA 4266
B. RIYADH 6666
C. RIYADH 6729
Classified By: Economic Counselor Thomas Goldberger for
reasons 1.4(b) and (d).
1. (C) Turkish MFA Deputy Director General for
Security Affairs Huseyin Bicakli told us August 29 that the
Foreign Ministry and the Finance Ministry would
appeal the Danistay (Council of State) July 20
ruling (ref a) that vacated the Council of Ministers
decree freezing al-Qadi's assets in Turkey.
Bicakli said he was 90% sure the Prime Ministry would join
the two other ministries in filing the appeal. He
said the court deadline for an appeal was September 4. For
now, he confirmed that al-Qadi's assets remain frozen in
Turkey. He noted that there were at least two more levels of
appeal available.
2. (C) Bicakli said the court ruling was based on the
merits of the al-Qadi file itself and did not overturn the
Government's practice of using Council of Minister decrees
to enforce UN 1267 committee designations. Other contacts
have contradicted Bicakli on this last point, telling us
that the Danistay ruling means that a court decision will
be needed from now on to freeze assets. Bicakli, however,
was unusually emphatic, and he is both relatively senior
and directly responsible for Turkey's compliance with
Security Council terrorism resolutions. We will seek
additional confirmation of this point.
3. (C) Comment: The likelihood of the Prime Ministry adding
its weight to the Government,s appeal is notable given the
Prime Minister,s favorable comments about al-Qadi as
reported in the Turkish press. It would seem to show that
Erdogan,s remarks do not reflect official policy and were likely a
spontaneous and ill-considered response to the opposition,s
use of the al-Qadi issue as a political club against the AKP
government. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that
Turkey,s hyper-secularist courts -- at knives drawn with the
AKP on nearly every issue -- would have colluded with the AKP to
release a terrorist financier,s assets. The court,s
initial ruling more likely reflects the weakness of Turkey,s legal
tools to combat terrorism financing, an issue we are pursuing
in many channels.
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/
WILSON