Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06AMMAN2056
2006-03-21 12:01:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

FIRST PREPARATORY MEETING FOR THE 2006 FORUM FOR

Tags:  PHUM PREL KDEM ECON RS JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

211201Z Mar 06
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 AMMAN 002056 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/15/2016
TAGS: PHUM PREL KDEM ECON RS JO
SUBJECT: FIRST PREPARATORY MEETING FOR THE 2006 FORUM FOR
THE FUTURE


Classified By: Ambassador David Hale for Reasons 1.4 (b),(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 AMMAN 002056

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/15/2016
TAGS: PHUM PREL KDEM ECON RS JO
SUBJECT: FIRST PREPARATORY MEETING FOR THE 2006 FORUM FOR
THE FUTURE


Classified By: Ambassador David Hale for Reasons 1.4 (b),(d)


1. (C) SUMMARY: At the prepcon for the Forum for the
Future, Russian co-chairs pushed for control over the end
product of the Forum -- including drafting the Chairman's
Summary and attempting to move much of the decision-making on
themes to be discussed to a much-expanded prepcon in Moscow
in May. Jordan and Bahrain, along with the U.S. and UK,
worked closely to limit Russia's problematic suggestions, but
we will need to maintain close coordination to ensure a
successful meeting in Amman in early December. END SUMMARY.



2. (SBU) Jordan and Russia co-chaired a meeting in Amman on
March 13 with delegations from Bahrain, Germany, Morocco, the
United Kingdom and the U.S. to discuss preparations for the
2006 Forum for the Future ("Forum"). The U.S. was
represented by the Ambassador, NEA DAS Scott Carpenter, DRL
DAS Erica Barks-Ruggles, NSC Director Farah Pandith, and
NEA/PI Officer Blake Thorkelson. The preparatory conference
("prepcon") participants discussed - subject to confirmation
by capitals - holding the next Forum at the Dead Sea in
Jordan from December 2-3 and a possible prepcon in Moscow at
the end of May. A readout of the principal matters addressed
is provided below.


3. (SBU) VENUE & DATES: Jordanian FM Abdelelah al-Khatib,
who opened the Amman prepcon with Minister of Planning Suheir
al-Ali, proposed that the 2006 Forum be held at the King
Hussein Conference Center at the Dead Sea - which he asserted
could accommodate both governmental meetings and civil
society forums - from December 2-3. He asked that the
delegations confirm these dates to the GOJ within the next
four weeks. Participants responded enthusiastically to the
proposed venue, and no delegations voiced serious concern
with reference to the dates.


4. (C) INVITEES: Russia pushed, as expected, to limit
participation from outside the region to the G-8 partners.
DAS Carpenter pointed out that many countries had brought
resources to the table, and that any required players like
Spain should again be included this year. In addition, he

pointed out, Turkey liked not being the only "other" in the
others group. Other delegations supported this broader
invitation and Russia agreed, though later noted it would
perhaps like to also invite some unspecified "others" to the
meeting.


5. (C) CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION: Jordan, Bahrain and
Morocco all advocated for continuing the practice of strong
NGO participation in the Forum, with the caveat that time
limits at the ministerial would need to be taken into account
in planning. The GOJ requested a list of prior Forum
participants with the understanding that more would be
welcome. The U.S. and UK delegations strongly endorsed
active civil society participation as "critical" to the
Forum's success. Russia attempted to push back, but noted
that several Russian NGOs had participated in DAD events and
that this had been useful. Unfortunately, the Russian
delegation speculated that governments could perhaps choose
NGO participants due to time pressures on the program, though
Morocco helpfully pointed out that the election of NGO reps
from among their members had been an important innovation in
the run up to the Forum in Bahrain. Reflecting on its
experience as host of the 2005 Forum, Bahrain underlined the
need for Forum participants to be given clear deadlines for
registration, requests to speak, and submission of proposals
and amendments.


6. (C) FORUM DECLARATION STATEMENT: Noting the problems
with achieving consensus on a final declaration at the 2005
Forum in Manama, FM Khatib suggested that the group consider
the issuance of a "chair summary" at the conclusion of the
Forum, rather than a formal statement. Most delegations
reacted positively to this proposal, with the U.S. delegation
noting that further outcome documents should be considered at
a date closer to the Forum. Germany suggested (as agreed in
advance with the U.S. and UK) that perhaps "work plans" on
major topics could be issued as a way of demonstrating
momentum for the 2007 Forum. Russia supported a "co-chair"
summary, pointedly declaring it should be involved in
drafting this. The UK responded that a summary issued by the
host country only was in line with past precedent.


7. (SBU) JORDANIAN INITIATIVES: Minister al-Ali presented
two new proposals to build upon G8-BMENA initiatives. First,
she proposed a "youth employment scheme" to tackle the
problem of high unemployment among young men and women in the
region by helping them get the information, skills and work
experience needed to make a successful transition to the
workplace. Such a project, according to al-Ali, would
complement ongoing vocational training initiatives. The
second proposal would establish a "public-private sector
matching fund" to promote research and innovation in the
region. Al-Ali explained that the proposed fund would
partner public and private funds to support research centers
and universities in developing useful and marketable
technologies. Several delegations, particularly Germany,
reacted positively to the youth employment idea as being
responsive to the concerns of civil society. The U.S. agreed
that youth employment was a worthwhile theme, but added that
it should build upon existing Forum initiatives, not take
away from the central focus on civil society and empowerment.
The U.S. also requested developed concept papers so that both
ideas could be given more consideration.


8. (SBU) OVERALL FORUM THEMES: A number of delegations
stressed that the 2006 Forum should reinforce initiatives
developed at prior Forums in Morocco and Bahrain. Germany
and the U.S. highlighted the need to remain focused on
reform, with an emphasis on projects achieving a practical
impact. The UK urged that the Forum move forward with themes
presented by civil society in Manama, such as youth
participation, anti-corruption, independent media and the
rule of law. At the prepcon conclusion, Jordan noted that
there was consensus on "empowerment" as the overall theme for
the 2006 Forum, and that this theme was broad enough to build
on the work of the two previous Forums while allowing for
some new, modest initiatives. The GOJ said that it would
prepare and circulate a summary of proposed projects and
initiatives for comment if participants forwarded a concept
paper for each such proposal.


9. (SBU) FUNDING ISSUES: Jordan stated that it would be
"generous" with its limited resources to support the Forum,
but added that monetary and in-kind contributions would be
greatly appreciated. The GOJ will prepare a tentative Forum
budget for distribution to the prepcon delegations. Morocco
called on G8 partners to provide financial assistance to host
nations of the Forum, and to help ensure participation of
cash-strapped NGOs. Morocco also noted that funds were
needed to finance Forum initiatives, claiming that several
proposals adopted in Bahrain still lacked funding. Bahrain
again made a plea for further G-8 support for the
Entrepreneurship Centers that were now up and running but
could not be sustained without broader G-8 support.


10. (SBU) REPORTING AND MINISTERIAL MEETING: The UK said
that a "reporting mechanism" for Forum dialogue and
initiatives was needed to keep countries and their ministers
informed. The British, joined by the U.S., stressed that the
ministerial portion of the Forum was very tight, and that
some reporting would be better suited to a senior officials
meeting held beforehand.


11. (C) MOSCOW PREPCON AND "COLLOQUIA": Russia announced
that it would like to host a prepcon in Moscow at the end of
May, or beginning of June, to finalize Forum themes and draft
the Forum summary statement, as well as to elaborate on
decisions reached at the Amman prepcon. Russia also said it
would like to sponsor two "colloquia" to discuss "the
regional context" for the BMENA initiative, including
(unhelpfully) the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, Iraq, Iran
and Syria. All other delegations pushed back on the idea of
discussing regional conflicts, noting the Forum's focus on
reform efforts and stating clearly that there are other, more
appropriate venues for these discussions. One colloquium
would be held in Moscow in June, and a second in St.
Petersburg in September. The U.S. again asked for detailed
concept papers on both "colloquia," but expressed strong
skepticism about the idea, which may build on an earlier
Egyptian proposal. (COMMENT: This idea, as well as the May
prepcon itself, is problematic for a host of reasons. We
will need to work creatively to limit their impact if not
kill them outright. We will need to work with the UK and the
Jordanians to kill this problematic proposal. END COMMENT.)


12. (C) The Russians also proposed that the Moscow prepcon
have a "larger" format than the current meeting, and include
representatives from all G8 nations and from more countries
in the region. They added that "other countries" outside of
the G8 and BMENA had indicated their desire to participate in
the Moscow event. DAS Carpenter responded that Forum
planning events should be kept small, and that inclusion of
"others" already existed at the Forum itself. If the Moscow
prepcon were to have a larger format, he continued, it might
warrant the inclusion of civil society groups to help flesh
out the Forum schedule. Both Jordan and Bahrain cautioned
that too many invitees to a possible Moscow prepcon could bog
down discussions and hinder consensus on a schedule. They
suggested that participants at a Moscow meeting first develop
a draft agenda and then present this to other interested
parties for comment.


13. (SBU) 2006 G8-BMENA EVENTS: Russia provided a verbal
rundown of proposed G8-BMENA events for the current year, and
promised to provide a comprehensive electronic list/matrix of
these events to each prepcon delegation. The U.S.
recommended that the list be posted by Jordan on the Forum
website for the benefit of civil society, and further
suggested that a permanent central website be created to
present all relevant information on Forum and G8-BMENA
activities. Jordan replied that it would work to develop
such a website, but would need relevant guidance and input
from others. The Jordanians added that each host country
would need to take over the site's maintenance for its host
year.


14. (C) 2007 FORUM: As the next president of the G8,
Germany said that it was premature at this time to discuss
the 2007 Forum. The U.S. agreed, stating that the host of
the 2007 Forum should be decided before such planning
started. Jordan reminded delegations that the host country
for the 2007 Forum would have to be announced at the Dead Sea
in December, thereby requiring efforts to identify a host
well beforehand. Germany confirmed that they are actively
discussing the issue with possible host nations. NOTE:
Confidentially, Germany indicated the UAE had signaled

SIPDIS
unofficially that it would host. The U.S. suggested that
others in the Gulf be considered, but Germany said it would
not approach another government until the UAE made its
decision clear. END NOTE.


15. (C) COMMENT: Russian suggestions at the prepcon proved
problematic on a host of fronts, including proposals to
expand invitations to unspecified "other" nations, limiting
civil society via government invitation and introducing
problematic regional conflict issues via the colloquia they
would like to host. The Jordanians pushed back on many of
these, with help from the other delegations. We are
concerned, however, that the Moscow prepcon could seriously
damage the 2006 Forum, so we will need to work in the next
month with the Jordanians and the UK to cast as much of the
'06 Forum's context in concrete as possible, including the
Chairman's Summary and robust thematic deliverables, to head
off Russian meddling. END COMMENT.


16. (U) DASs Carpenter and Barks-Ruggles have cleared on
this cable.
HALE