Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06AITTAIPEI600
2006-03-01 01:40:00
UNCLASSIFIED
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT CHEN'S ANNOUNCEMENT OF

Tags:  OPRC KMDR KPAO TW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0600/01 0600140
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 010140Z MAR 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8720
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4737
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 5932
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000600 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ERIC
BARBORIAK
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

SIPDIS



E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT CHEN'S ANNOUNCEMENT OF
CESSATION OF THE NATIONAL UNIFICATION COUNCIL AND GUIDELINES


UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000600

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ERIC
BARBORIAK
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

SIPDIS



E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT CHEN'S ANNOUNCEMENT OF
CESSATION OF THE NATIONAL UNIFICATION COUNCIL AND GUIDELINES



1. Summary: On the February 28 Incident Memorial Day,
Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies gave prominent
reporting and editorial coverage to President Chen's
announcement Monday that the National Unification Council
(NUC) will "cease to function" and the National Unification
Guidelines (NUG) will "cease to apply." Almost all papers,
with the exception of the pro-independence "Liberty Times,"
Taiwan's biggest daily, reported Chen's announcement on
their front pages. These newspapers also devoted their
first few pages to various news stories about the reactions
of Washington, Beijing and the pan-Blue camp to Chen's
decision. The pro-status quo "China Times" ran a current
opinion survey on its page four which reported that 51
percent of the people polled said they do not support Chen's
decision to cease the functioning of the NUC while 20
percent said they supported such a move. Also, 47 percent
of the respondents said they are worried about the
deterioration of cross-Strait relations, and 46 percent said
they are concerned about the damage done to Taiwan's
relations with the United States. The same poll result also
indicated that President Chen's approval rating has dropped
to a new low of 24 percent. A poll on the front page of
mass-circulation "Apple Daily" also showed that 56 percent
of the people polled said they don't think Chen's decision
will reduce tensions between Washington, Beijing, and
Taipei. The newspaper also ran a news story on its page two
with the headline: "The Presidential Office's Interpretation
Is That the United States Does Not Strongly Oppose [Chen's
Plan to] Scrap the NUC and NUG."


2. The Chinese-language dailies editorialized either on
Chen's announcement or the February 28 Incident. The "Free
Talk" column in the "Liberty Times" and an editorial in the
pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" both hailed Chen's decision,
calling it a move that highlights Taiwan's sovereignty. An
"Apple Daily" editorial noted that Washington said it
understood Chen's move because it realized that the KMT and
Ma Ying-jeou's pro-unification stance could present real
lurking dangers for the United States. An editorial in the

pro-unification "United Daily News," however, called Chen's
move an insult to himself and to Taiwan, as Chen has
"publicly put on the Incantation Hoop [meaning that he is
being restricted] offered to him by the United States."
Journalist Lin Shu-ling said in a news analysis in the
"China Times" that Chen succeeded in going ahead with his
plan to scrap the NUC and NUG because he has seen through
Washington's pattern in handling the cross-Strait issues.
An editorial in the limited-circulated, conservative, pro-
unification English-language "China Post" directly pointed
out that given Chen's announcement, the credibility of the
United States' is now at stake and its one-China policy is
undermined. End summary.

A) "Making An Incantation [to Block out the Ghost of
Unification]"

The "Free Talk" column in the pro-independence "Liberty
Times" [circulation: 600,000] said (2/28):

"A-bian used the word `cease' [zhong-zhi] to replace
`abolish' [fei-chu] and marked an ending for the big show of
scrapping the NUC and NUG, which started playing during the
Lunar New Year holidays. This ending may not please all the
local supporters of Taiwan's nativism, but they can at least
accept it. . There is still a long way to go for Taiwan to
become a normal nation even though it has crossed the
threshold of scrapping the NUC and NUG. Besides, every
hurdle starting from the [holding of the] defensive
referendum [in 2004] to scrapping [fei] the NUC and NUG has
been very difficult. [Taiwan] is facing more and more tests
and obstacles, and it will be easily torn apart by China if
Taiwan people fail to unite together."

B) "President A-bian's Announcement of the Cessation of the
NUC Has Secured the Principle of `People Possessing the
Right to Their Country's Sovereignty' and Raising Taiwan
People's Voices"

The pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" [circulation: 100,000]
editorialized (2/28):

". President Chen's announcement [of the cessation of the
NUC and NUG] was mainly based on the democratic principle
that people have the right to the sovereignty of their
country; it was also a move made [to protest] China's non-
peaceful attempt to alter the status quo across the Taiwan
Strait, as evidenced by its continuous military threats

[against the island] and the `Anti-Secession Law.' Chen's
announcement is thus not a move for Taiwan to provoke China
but a [show of] respect for Taiwan's public views. Nor is
it an attempt to alter the cross-Strait status quo but a
necessary announcement to remind the international community
that China is the one that is really attempting to change
the status quo. We thus gave high marks to Chen's decision
at this historical moment, which showed that he, despite
China's threats, insists on maintaining Taiwan's status quo
of freedom, democracy and human rights and safeguarding the
23 million Taiwan people's freedom of choice. Taiwan's
history will remember this day and this page, the moment in
which Taiwan people's sovereignty is genuinely highlighted.
."

C) "A-Bian Wins His Victory in Grave Dangers"

The mass-circulated "Apple Daily" [circulation: 500,000]
editorialized (2/28):

". Chen announced [Monday] that to safeguard Taiwan's
democracy and maintain the [cross-Strait] status quo, the
NUC will cease to function. ... This statement showed that
the United States has understood Taiwan's decision to cease
the functioning of the NUC, and it is also a belated strike
against China's [enactment of] the `Anti-Secession Law'. .

". In reality, the worst consequence [during the process of
Chen's move to scrap the NUC and NUG] was Washington's harsh
reaction; Washington has used various means to show Taiwan
that [Chen's move] would severely jeopardize Taiwan's
interests and put the island in an unfavorable position.
But perhaps [during this process,] the United States
gradually became aware that showing appropriate support for
the DPP may be a way to stabilize Taiwan's pro-U.S.
attitude, and that the KMT and Ma Ying-jeou's pro-
unification stance could pose real lurking dangers for the
United States. Perhaps it was based on such an insight that
the United States said it understood [Taiwan's reasons for]
the move. ."

D) "Humiliation for Chen and for Taiwan: Chen Shui-bian
Publicly Puts on the Incantation Hoop Offered to Him by the
United States"

The pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation:
400,000] commented in an editorial (2/28):

"Chen Shui-bian's movement to push for `[Taiwan's] new
constitution and to scrap the NUC and NUG' suffered a sever
defeat; He publicly put on the "incantation hoop" handed to
him by the United States yesterday and in the meantime gave
up Taiwan's national dignity. .

"Chen's move to `scrap the NUC and NUG' [fei tong] this time
was aimed at demonstrating his ability to `change the status
quo.' But judged by the Presidential Office's statements
yesterday, Chen is evidently tightly controlled by the
Incantation Hoop that `will not allow him to change the
status quo.' Chen repeatedly emphasized [Monday] that
Taiwan has no intention to alter the status quo. Strictly
speaking, even though Chen did not reiterate the `Five No's'
pledge, his declaration that `Taiwan will amend its
constitution by adhering to [the constitutional] procedures'
was akin to keeping his `Four No's' pledge. Chen did not
necessarily have the upper hand with regard to his `last No'
[in the `Five No's' pledge] by announcing the cessation of
the NUC and NUG. [We] can say that the `Five No's' pledge
is in substance `the status quo that cannot be altered.' .
What is really bizarre is that even though Chen's
announcement [Monday] indicated another severe defeat for
him, he may be the only one who benefits from such a
development. . Chen may have won a victory by successfully
snatching back his position as the flagman of the Taiwan
independence, but he has also made his country and society
pay a severe price!"

E) "Maneuvering Through Another Door, Bian Has `the Next
Step' [in Mind]"

Journalist Lin Shu-ling said in a news analysis in the pro-
status quo "China Times" [circulation: 400,000] (2/28):

". Bian has been in power for over five years and has had a
huge national security team. His decision not to care about
[the attitudes of] Washington and Beijing [with regard to
his move to scrap the NUC and NUG] was based on his own

logic and not necessarily a result of `impulsiveness.' The
only difference is that the logic of the Chen administration
in dealing with Washington-Beijing-Taipei relations differs
from the thought process of the pan-Blue camp and some
scholars. That is, even though Chen knows that Taiwan needs
the United States' protection, he is also clearly aware that
the United States also needs Taiwan to restrain China.
[Chen is aware that] it is not that Taiwan has no room to
play its cards.

"When [Washington and Taipei] were busy negotiating over
[Taiwan's plan to hold] a referendum in 2003, it was also a
period in which Washington-Beijing relations were severely
strained. [At that time,] the United States was anxious to
deal with the problems of Iraq and North Korea and did not
want Chen to affect U.S. cooperation with China. As a
result, Washington publicly rebuked Taipei in front of
Beijing during Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's visit to the
United States. This exchange of blows made the Chen
administration see through Washington's pattern of handling
cross-Strait issues: namely, to `prevent things from getting
bigger' `to mediate between both sides in an attempt to
quell the whole argument.'

"People inside the Chen administration believe that no
matter whether it was the referendum or [Chen's plan to]
scrap the NUC and NUG, Washington stepped in [the cross-
Strait disputes] in order to show its position to Beijing
and to maintain its pivotal position between the two sides
of the Taiwan Strait. As long as Taiwan is willing to back
up a little, plus accept some superficial `penalties', so
that Washington can show them to Beijing, it will not be so
difficult . for Taiwan to get through and go ahead with its
plan. ."

F) "De-unification Is Chen's Legacy"

The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China
Post" [circulation: 30,000] editorialized (2/28):

". Yesterday afternoon, Chen convened a National Security
Council meeting and achieved a unanimous resolution that
from now on the NUC should `cease to function' and its
guidelines `cease to apply.' The word `abolish' was avoided
to placate the U.S. Thus in both cases, Taiwan's `reckless'
leader has had his way. Having achieved little during the
past six years in office and with only two more to go, Chen
now hopes to secure a legacy as the spiritual leader of the
Taiwan independence movement. Freezing or abolishing the
NUC does not change the status quo or advance the movement a
bit, but `de-unification' has become Chen's shining
achievement. .

"Washington is trapped. To punish Taipei, it may be seen as
helping the undemocratic China to bully a democratic ally.
But if it does not react, the much-needed `stakeholder'
Beijing will see it as a tacit move to divide China. U.S.
credibility is at stake. Its one-China policy, the bedrock
of regional peace and stability, is undermined. But is
Taiwan independence protected under the U.S. Taiwan
Relations Act?"

KEEGAN