Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06AITTAIPEI579
2006-02-26 22:55:00
UNCLASSIFIED
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

MEDIA REACTION: WASHINGTON-BEIJING-TAIPEI RELATIONS

Tags:  OPRC KMDR KPAO TW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0014
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0579/01 0572255
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 262255Z FEB 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8683
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4720
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 5913
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000579 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ERIC
BARBORIAK
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

SIPDIS



E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: WASHINGTON-BEIJING-TAIPEI RELATIONS


UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000579

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ERIC
BARBORIAK
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

SIPDIS



E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: WASHINGTON-BEIJING-TAIPEI RELATIONS



1. Summary: Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies
continued to focus their coverage February 24 on the
aftermath of President Chen Shui-bian's announced proposal
to abolish the National Unification Council (NUC) and
National Unification Guidelines (NUG); a BBC interview with
KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou in London; and the February 28
Incident of 1947. The pro-independence "Liberty Times,"
Taiwan's biggest daily, ran a banner headline on its page
two that quoted Chen as saying that he "Will Abolish the NUC
and NUG Even [at the Risk of] Being Scolded by [U.S.
President George W.] Bush." The pro-status quo "China
Times," on the other hand, ran a banner headline on its
front page that read: "Bian Will Have a Remedy for [His
Planned Move to] Abolish the NUC and NUG; [He Will] Scrap
the `Last No' But Keep the `Four No's.'" The newspaper also
carried an exclusive news story on its front page with the
headline: "United States: Does Taiwan Still Need Our
Protection?" The pro-unification "United Daily News" topped
its front-page news story on the topic with the headline:
"To Release the Pressure on [Chen's Plan] to Abolish the NUC
and NUG, [Mainland Affairs Council Chairman] Joseph Wu
Passes a Message [via a Third Person to Beijing]: [Taiwan]
Will Not Cross the Red Line."


2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, a "China Times"
editorial urged Taipei to be mentally prepared because
Washington is sure to "teach Taiwan a lesson" for Chen's
plan to abolish the NUC and NUG. The article said "Chen may
likely win himself the throne of the new godfather of Taiwan
independence, and he may resolve his leadership crisis
inside the DPP in the end. But Taiwan, other than
accomplishing Chen's personal political benefits, will have
to pay an extraordinarily high price, and this price is sure
to be paid by all the Taiwan people." Yu Pen-li, assistant
professor at Tamkang University's Graduate Institute of
American Studies, cautioned Taiwan in the mass-circulation
"Apple Daily" that Washington and Beijing may decide to sign
a fourth communiqu during the meeting between U.S.
President George W. Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao in
April. An editorial in the limited-circulated, pro-

independence, English-language "Taiwan News," on the other
hand, defended Chen by saying that the plan to abolish the
NUC and NUG is a move to uphold Taiwan's current status.
End summary.

A) "How Is Washington Going to Teach Taiwan a Lesson? --
The Probability That Taiwan Cannot Avoid Accepting"

The pro-status quo "China Times" [circulation: 400,000]
editorialized (2/24):


"Judging from President Chen's personal remarks to U.S.
House Representative Rob Simmons the other day, the policy
to abolish the NUC and NUG seem to be decided already. Now
the question that remains is the `timing' [of the
government's] formal announcement of the decision. . In
other words, as of now, the question regarding whether
[Chen] will abolish the NUC and NUG is already [one that
should be in] the past tense. The question that should be
asked now instead is what `consequences' Taiwan will have to
bear for the abolition of the NUC and NUG. .

"This kind of waiting and speculation is really very
uncomfortable [for the Taiwan people]! [We] all know that
there will be harm [done to Taiwan], but we have no idea
what kind of harm it will be. After all, Washington has
made it very clear to Taiwan that it does not wish to see
the latter go along with its plan [to abolish the NUC and
NUG]. It can be said that Washington has `said everything
it could' [to Taiwan] by sending a secret envoy to
personally persuade [Chen] and by repeated publicly calling
on [Taiwan to refrain from carrying out the plan]. But Chen
remains unmoved. Now the ball is in Washington's court. No
one knows what Washington's next response will be. Will it
humiliate Taiwan again during the meeting between U.S.
President George W. Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao in
April, or postpone the talks and signing of the U.S.-Taiwan
Free Trade Agreement? Will it postpone the appointment of
[the new] AIT director, or there will be other [penalties]?
Perhaps it will turn out to be just a light penalty in the
end, or it may be a severe one. But no matter what, at
least we can be sure that the United States will surely
respond. Taiwan had better be mentally prepared that things
will not be over so easily. .

"The point with regard to the abolition of the NUC and NUG
is that it does not matter whether the NUC or NUG are `an
absurd product made during an absurd era' or that whether
the KMT has already `included Taiwan independence as a
possible option' [for Taiwan people to decide on their
future]. What really matters is whether Taiwan has violated
its own pledge and whether it is exploring the possibility
of crossing the red line of the policy. It is unlikely that
the United States is not aware that the NUC is a body that
`exists in name only,' and the move to abolish the NUC and
NUG will not create clear and imminent change to the
substance of the status quo across the Taiwan Strait. But
for the United States, Chen's move to `pick up a piece of
trash that is already in the trash can and toss it [back in]
again' (to quote [former DPP Chairman] Shih Ming-teh's
phrase) is by no means aimed at the NUC and NUG themselves.
Instead, [what Chen cares about is] the symbolic
significance of such a move; namely, it is an indication of
a string of changes that are about to follow. . If
Washington takes no action at all [towards Taiwan], it will
mean that the Five No's overall falling part will just be a
matter of time. Should that happen, Beijing's will
definitely enhance its power of backlashes, and both sides
of the Taiwan Strait will again fall into a new wave of
`uncertainty.' Will the United States be happy to see such
a development? If Taiwan is the one that creates the change
in the status quo, especially Washington has failed to stop
Taiwan after President George W. Bush has personally sent an
envoy to persuade Taiwan not to do it, how can the United
States not get angry and take this opportunity to `teach
Taiwan a lesson'!

"No matter what the United States chooses to do in the end,
it is expected that it will do damage to Taiwan's right and
interests. Anyone with an international sense is clearly
aware of this result, but Chen's recent actions seemed to
show that he did not care at all, and the DPP also seems
very confident and fearless about what it is doing. Yes,
Chen may likely win himself the throne of the new godfather
of Taiwan independence, and he may likely resolve his
leadership crisis inside the DPP in the end. But Taiwan,
other than accomplishing Chen's personal political benefits,
will have to pay an extraordinarily high price, and this
price is sure to be paid jointly by all Taiwan people."

B) "[Taiwan] Must Watch out for the [Sino-U.S.] Fourth
Communiqu After It Abolishes the NUC and NUG"

Yu Pen-li, assistant professor at Tamkang University's
Graduate Institute of American Studies, commented in the
mass-circulation "Apple Daily" [circulation: 500,000]
(2/24):

". The failure of [U.S. National Security Council Senior
Acting Director for Asian Affairs] Dennis Wilder's assigned
trip to communicate with Taiwan will not be the end but the
beginning of the controversy about [President Chen's]
proposal to abolish the NUC and NUG. It is imaginable that
the relevant U.S. government agencies in Washington will
upgrade its level in handling the cross-Strait issues. .
The biggest nightmare for the United States is having
tensions rise across the Taiwan Strait because both sides
misread the situation, and as a result, the cross-Strait
situation gets out of control, forcing Washington to advance
[the time to sit down] with Beijing and have a showdown over
the Taiwan issue in an attempt to prevent being dragged into
war.

"In order to avoid the risks of being dragged into war and
to reduce tensions [across the Taiwan Strait], Washington
will only strengthen communication with Beijing rather than
resisting it. Beijing will also increase its pressure on
Washington and not just bluff. As maintaining peace and
stability in the Taiwan Strait closely concerns Washington's
and Beijing's interests, Washington's joining hands with
Beijing to restrain Taipei will then be the greatest test
for the Taiwan government and its people.

". Chinese President Hu Jintao's visit to the United States
in April is thus of essential importance. Will Washington
and Beijing, out of their joint needs to restrain the Taiwan
authorities' marginal policy, sign a fourth communiqu to
put into words their opposition to Taiwan independence? .
This is something that Taiwan should pay more attention to.
."

C) "Abolishing NUG Upholds Taiwan's Current Status"

The pro-independence, English-language "Taiwan News"
[circulation: 20,000] said in an editorial (2/24):

"We urge all political actors, Taiwan citizens and foreign
observers to grasp the key point that the proposal by
President Chen Shui-bian to formally abolish the long-
dormant NUC and its NUG is a move that will preserve
Taiwan's current status, not `unilaterally alter' the status
quo in the Taiwan Strait. . We believe that President Chen
can make this issue clearer by reaffirming that all options
for the future are open based on the reality that Taiwan is
now an independent and self-governing democratic state and
that any changes in Taiwan's current status need to be
ratified by national referendum of our citizens, as already
stipulated in our Constitution.

"With a neutral government policy and a process of
Constitutional reform that requires three-fourths
Legislative approval and ratification by half of the
eligible voters in a national referendum, everyone can feel
assured that any changes in Taiwan's status will require an
overwhelming consensus and will no longer be vulnerable to
unilateral or caviler dictation by any political party or
individual. Eliminating the NUC and NUG will bolster our
current status, not change it."

KEEGAN