Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05YEREVAN6
2005-01-04 13:01:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Yerevan
Cable title:  

ARMENIA STRENGTHENS ADVOCATES AND PUBLIC

Tags:  PGOV PHUM AM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

041301Z Jan 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 000006 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN AND DRL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM AM
SUBJECT: ARMENIA STRENGTHENS ADVOCATES AND PUBLIC
DEFENDERS


Sensitive but unclassified. Please protect
accordingly.

-------
SUMMARY
-------

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 000006

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN AND DRL

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM AM
SUBJECT: ARMENIA STRENGTHENS ADVOCATES AND PUBLIC
DEFENDERS


Sensitive but unclassified. Please protect
accordingly.

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (SBU) The Armenian National Assembly adopted
legislation December 14 that creates a potentially
powerful Chamber of Advocates for criminal defense
lawyers and seeks to improve the state-funded public
defender's program. Local legal assistance groups
believe the changes may help level the playing field in
a court system that often favors the prosecution. The
legislation attempts to rectify deficiencies in defense
lawyers' qualifications, organization, training,
ethics, and funding. While the new organization has
not begun to take shape, the law describes institutions
likely to improve criminal defense lawyers' abilities
to advocate for their clients. We intend to work with
this group as it develops. End Summary.

--------------
CURRENT CRIMINAL DEFENSE
--------------


2. (SBU) According to the local representative of the
American Bar Association's Central European and
Eurasian Law Initiative (ABA/CEELI),criminal defense
lawyers in Armenia are poorly trained, underpaid, and
bound only by vague ethical restraints. As a result,
they often do not effectively assert their clients'
rights and sometimes become a vehicle through which
defendants try to bribe judges. The Armenian
Constitution guarantees every criminal defendant a
lawyer, but court-appointed attorneys frequently
collude with the prosecution. According to ABA/CEELI's
2003 Legal Profession Reform Index for Armenia,
prosecutors often choose the lawyer who will be their
opposing counsel, decide which information to give the
defense, and decide how much to pay the defense lawyer.
For this reason, indigent Armenians frequently waive
their right to counsel and defend themselves in
criminal court.

--------------
LAW ON ADVOCACY
--------------


3. (SBU) The Law on Advocacy approved by the National
Assembly December 14 has three main goals: to create a
unified organization to enforce ethical standards,
encourage higher standards for the training of
advocates, and create a public defender's program
controlled by the advocates. (Note: In Armenia, the
term "advocate" refers only to lawyers who represent
criminal defendants in court. End Note.) The law
creates a Chamber of Advocates, which has sole

authority over testing, licensing, and discipline of
advocates. The law codifies ethical concepts such as
conflict of interest and client privilege, but also
establishes an ethics committee within the Chamber that
has the power to elaborate on these basic ethical
standards. The law separates the public defender's
office from State control but mandates that the
government will pay public defenders at the same rate
as prosecutors. The law also seeks to secure the
Chamber's independence and objectivity. The Chamber
reports to no branch of the government and is almost
completely supported by member dues. It is subject to
a yearly external audit, which will be reported to the
membership. The law also establishes due process for
disciplinary procedures and enumerates the rights of
individual advocates within the organization.

--------------
NOT OUT OF THE WOODS
--------------


4. (SBU) The traditions of Soviet law practice,
however, still hang over the legal profession in
Armenia and may endanger the effectiveness of the new
institution. Armenian defense attorneys and judges
have long followed the prosecutor's lead in criminal
cases, and much of the "old guard" advocates have found
this arrangement both comfortable and profitable since
Armenian independence. Furthermore single judges still
decide most Armenian criminal cases and there is no
guarantee that decisions will change even if defense
skills dramatically improve. The law combines two
previously separate lawyers' associations, and members
of the more progressive union, which prides itself on
protecting civil liberties, fear that more conservative
members will outvote them in the unified Chamber.

COMMENT
--------------


5. (SBU) The new Chamber has the potential to improve
significantly the abilities of advocates to assert
their clients' rights, and even if conservatives were
to seize control of the Chamber, the law affords many
opportunities through which dissenters could promote
human rights. Significant checks and balances within
the organization prevent a faction from controlling the
Chamber, and the law protects individual advocates from
arbitrary disciplinary procedures. Progressive
advocates could use structures within the organization
to advance their agenda, and as allowed by the law,
they are currently forming a watchdog NGO to monitor
civil rights in criminal trials. The new Chamber could
be a great force for change, but we will continue to
monitor if the Chamber lives up to this potential.
This body, when it is formed, would be a natural
partner for our assistance programs aimed at building
Armenia's democratic institutions. We will work with
this group as it develops.
GODFREY