Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05YEREVAN1829
2005-10-13 06:32:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Yerevan
Cable title:  

ARMENIA'S JUDGES STEP FORWARD

Tags:  PGOV PHUM PINR AM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

130632Z Oct 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 YEREVAN 001829 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PINR AM
SUBJECT: ARMENIA'S JUDGES STEP FORWARD


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 YEREVAN 001829

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PINR AM
SUBJECT: ARMENIA'S JUDGES STEP FORWARD



1. (U) SUMMARY: At their autumn general meeting, Armenia's
judges collectively stole a march on the country's ruling
political parties and came out strongly and forthrightly in
favor of the Council-of-Europe-approved Constitutional
amendments, while also approving a Code of Ethics that
USAID-supported ABA-CEELI has been pressing for over a year.
In addition, several court appointments and resultant
decisions over the summer seem to have brightened the
prospects for Armenia's judiciary gradually emerging from the
shadow of the executive. END SUMMARY


2. (U) The Association of Judges of the Republic of Armenia
(AJRA) met in annual plenary session on October 10 in
Yerevan. There were two items of business, approval of the
constitutional amendments (which have been approved in third
parliamentary reading, and sent to the President for
promulgation as the subject of the November 27 referendum),
and approval of the draft Judges' Code of Ethics (or
Conduct). Both items were discussed at some length by
multiple speakers. While it seemed to us that the outcome of
the debate was probably foreordained, discussion was lively
and intelligent, and discussants hailed from a broad range of
courts within the system, the moribund Constitutional Court
being the one notable absentee. There follows a
represenative smattering of quotations from the speakers
designed to give some sense of the discussion. Proceedings
of the session will eventually be published.

Discussion of Constitutional Amendments
--------------


3. (U) Some of the points made by the speakers:

Justice Minister David Harutyunian set the stage by noting
that it had been determined by experts that the single most
important variable in determining a country's success on the
road to development was not mineral or other natural
resources but a well-functioning judiciary. Speaking from
handwritten notes, the Justice Minister admitted that the
amendments were not perfect, but argued that they represented
the most the political situation would permit. He called on
the Association of Judges to endorse them. Note: Harutyunian
was one of the primary drafters of the proposed amendments.
End Note.

Ombudsman Larisa Alayerdyan, in a short talk, stressed the
human rights advantages that Armenian society would derive
from the amended constitution, saying that it would become a

"true safeguard," and a "cornerstone for the rule of law."

Delivering the main address, the newly-appointed Chairman of
the Court of Cassation, Hovhannes Manukyan, assessed the
amendments as representing a "great possibility for
significant progress" towards democracy in the Republic of
Armenia, but took care to note that, in endorsing them, the
judges would be carrying out their civic duty, not taking a
political position. He noted that the amendments would mean
an increased role for the Court of Cassation -- which will
essentially become the highest court in the land -- and would
deal with the problem of "inaccessibility of constitutional
justice," a reference to the fact that the Constitutional
Court has been virtually moribund, with few cases brought
before it, especially after its role in the contested and
flawed elections of 2003, when it was politicized and then
ignored. The Chairman of the Constitutional Court, Gagik
Harutyunyan, was listed as a speaker on the program of the
event, but was not in evidence.

Arman Mkrtumyan, chair of the Chamber of Civil and Economic
Cases, Court of Cassation, argued that the amendments would
bring about a "unified system of courts," which is code for
case law and reliance on precedent; the phrase is used to
avoid antagonizing Soviet-mentality law professors at the
Yerevan State University who have a deeply ingrained aversion
to the concept.

Mher Khachatryan, Chair of the Chamber of Criminal and
Military Cases of the Court of Cassation, called it "an
historic day for the independence of judges." He cited an
aphorism, "tell me how independent your Prosecutor General is
and I will tell you how independent are your judges." The
Prosecutor General, Aghvan Hovsepyan, also was listed in the
program as a speaker, but was out of the country, as he later
explained to us.

Eduard Muradian, Chair of the Economic Court, cited the
amendment of article 92 of the Constitution as establishing
the unity of the judiciary, ensuring "unified application of
the laws," and "extending legal fairness and full protections
to the population." He noted that the amendments would play
an important role in strengthening democracy and the rule of
law. Note: one of the persistent criticisms of the courts in
Armenia has been that cases can migrate from one branch of
the judicial system to another, with varying results. The
hope is that with "unity of the judiciary" and introduction
of rules of precedent -- case law -- this problem can be
brought under control. End Note.

Tigran Sahayan, chair of the Appeal Court of Criminal and
Military Cases, discussed the tools that the courts would
have in future, and stressed that case law would in time
itself become a source of law.

Ara Kubanyan of the First Instance Court of Erebuni and
Nubarshen (Yerevan) stressed the responsiblity of court
officials to carry out decisions of the courts, and gave some
examples in which this had not been done. He also spoke of
the change of the term of parliamentary deputies, the amended
article on impeachment, the veto power, the limitation of the
Prosecutor General to two terms of office, and the
limitations placed on the president to convene the whole
government except in certain limited cases involving foreign
affairs and national security as improvements to the system.

Anatoliy Matevosyan, a judge of the Economic Court, also
spoke of the problem of migration of cases through the
system, and said that the effect of the amendments would be
to eliminate this ill. He noted that the process of amending
the Constitution had taken seven years, and that, by adopting
the package, Armenia would honor its commitment to the
Council of Europe. Matevosyan also spoke of "improved checks
and balances and separation of powers" in the amended system,
focusing especially on the increased independence of the
Justice Council, which will in future have no representative
of the Executive, and will deal with all matters affecting
judges, and have the responsibility for disciplining them.

After a matter-of-fact presentation of the resolution in
favor of the amendments presented by Hrachik Sargsyan of the
Armavir First Instance Court and Chairman of the AJRA, the
resolution was put to a voice vote and passed unanimously.


4. (U) COMMENT: While the judges have now come out firmly in
favor of the constitutional amendments, it is being reported
that the three coalition parties have been squabbling over
how to proceed in the "vote yest" campaign. They have
apparently established a campaign headquarters, but it is as
yet unclear whether one individual will head the effort or
whether there will be some kind of collective approach. END
COMMENT.

Judges' Code of Conduct
--------------


5. (U) The Judges' Code of Conduct has been a goal of the
ABA/CEELI program sponsored by USAID under the FREEDOM
Support Act. Although praise for ABA/CEELI and other unnamed
American experts was heard during the discussion, it was not
effusive and did not detract from the discussion of the role
of judges in Armenian society. Some representative
quotations from the discussion:

David Avetisyan, deputy chair of the AJRA and a judge of the
Court of Cassation, led off by saying that the desired high
status of judges in a society depended on their standards of
ethics, and recalled that the earlier code of ethics had been
adopted in 1999, prior to Armenia's accession to the Council
of Europe, and was in need of wholesale revision. In calling
for the adoption of the new Code of Conduct, he specified
three goals: to strengthen judicial independence, to increase
the accountability of judges, and to raise public confidence
in the judiciary. This involved strict impartiality on the
part of judges, who must get rid of improper ties, resigning
from cases if necessary, and not only carry out their work
without any hint of prejudice, but also behave properly
outside the courtroom, avoiding contact with parties to a
court proceeding, and acting with competence and diligence.

Suren Mnoyan , Chair of the Aragatsotn First Instance Court,
recalled discussions with American experts and stressed the
importance of judges' complying with, and being seen to
comply with, the ethics standards.

Tigran Petrosyan, Judge of the Court of First Instance in
Armavir, also stressed that the new standards were necessary,
and that judges should aspire to honor them and be tightly
held to them.

Karine Ghazaryan, a Judge of the appeals Court of Criminal
and Military Cases, appealed for a future for the children of
Armenia that included fair courts, perceived as being fair.

Khachatur Baghdasaryan, a judge of the first instance court
of Avan and Nor Nork, emphasized that in any democracy the
public needed to have confidence in the judiciary. He
recalled that the work on the code of ethics had taken place
over two years, and invoked the "Bangalore Principles."

Hrachik Sargsyan presented the resolution approving the draft
code. Two amendments were proposed and adopted before the
resolution, as amended, was voted upon. The first (from the
Ombudsman) called for the resolution to be distributed not
only to the professional legal community, but to the broader
public. The second called on the Board of the Court Council
to add a commentary to the Code of Conduct using practical
examples. The resolution was adopted by voice vote,
apparently unanimously.


6. (U) COMMENT: It was striking that the judges spoke openly
and freely, despite the presence of the Minister of Justice,
about the need to reduce the interference of the Executive in
judicial issues. Looking at the broader context, several
sources have commented to us in recent days that the new
court appointments that were announced early this summer, in
particular that of Hovhannes Manukyan to chair the Court of
Cassation, have breathed new life into the Armenian court
system. It was the Chamber of Criminal and Militaqry Cases
of the Court of Cassation that, on July 22, essentially
"struck down" the Soviet-era provision for five days'
administrative detention in criminal cases, effectively
establishing a form of habeas corpus in Armenia for the first
time. Another judge in whom high hopes have been expressed
is Eduard Muradyan, the new chairman of the Economic Court
(who, by the way, is a graduate of the Muskie program, having
studied in Ohio in the mid-1990s.) END COMMENT.








EVANS