Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05YEREVAN1096
2005-06-23 12:27:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Yerevan
Cable title:  

GOAM WON'T COMMIT TO SHUTDOWN DATE FOR NUCLEAR

Tags:  ENRG EAID AM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

231227Z Jun 05
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001096 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN, EUR/ACE, EB/ESC
DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USAID EGAT FOR WALTER HALL
DOE FOR CHARLES WASHINGTON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/22/2015
TAGS: ENRG EAID AM
SUBJECT: GOAM WON'T COMMIT TO SHUTDOWN DATE FOR NUCLEAR
PLANT, SPURNS EU OFFER

REF: A. 04 YEREVAN 382 B. YEREVAN 1039

Classified By: A.F. Godfrey for reasons 1.4 (b,d)

-------
SUMMARY
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001096

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN, EUR/ACE, EB/ESC
DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USAID EGAT FOR WALTER HALL
DOE FOR CHARLES WASHINGTON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/22/2015
TAGS: ENRG EAID AM
SUBJECT: GOAM WON'T COMMIT TO SHUTDOWN DATE FOR NUCLEAR
PLANT, SPURNS EU OFFER

REF: A. 04 YEREVAN 382 B. YEREVAN 1039

Classified By: A.F. Godfrey for reasons 1.4 (b,d)

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (C) During a June 22 conference on Armenia Nuclear Power
Plant (ANPP) Decommissioning, delegates from the European
Commission reiterated their call for Armenia to close its
nuclear power plant "reasonably early" due to safety
concerns, and renewed an offer of 100 million euro in
assistance to build new electricity generation capacity in
exchange for setting a "relatively early date certain" for
decommissioning. The Minister of Energy said that the GOAM's
position had not changed: it will close the plant
prematurely only if foreign donors provide adequate
replacement that does not reduce Armenia's energy security or
dramatically increase tariffs. End Summary.

-------------- --------------
EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO RESTART DIALOGUE ON ANPP CLOSURE
-------------- --------------


2. (C) European Commission delegate Silvia Zehe used the
conference to announce that the commission wants to "restart
(their) dialogue on decommissioning and finding alternatives
to the Armenia Nuclear Power Plant." Adding that the EU,
through TACIS, would continue its assistance to upgrade
safety and security at the current plant, the European
commission was "prepared to give 100 million euros towards
building replacement capacity in exchange for Armenia setting
a relatively early date certain for decommissioning ANPP."
The EU offered the same deal that Armenia rejected in early
2004 (ref A). Zehe added that she was "sorry" that it
appeared that 100 million euros wouldn't be enough, and the
Commission will look to other donors to help. She suggested
that the European Commission could work with the government
of Armenia to assembly a "true donor conference."

-------------- --------------
TO CLOSE ANPP "PREMATURELY," GOAM NEEDS DIVERSITY
-------------- --------------


3. (C) The Minister of Energy said that the GOAM's position
had not changed: The GOAM is "ready to decommission
prematurely if adequate replacement is put in place." The
Minister stressed that adequate replacement means more than

just 400 MW of generation capacity to replace that of ANPP.
Replacement options should not dramatically increase
electricity tariffs and must preserve Armenia's energy
security with diversified sources. (Were ANPP to close
today, Armenia would depend on the single, poorly maintained
gas pipeline through Georgia for 85 percent of it
electricity.) The Minister said that the minimum assistance
necessary for Armenia to plan premature decommissioning would
be soft financing for the remainder of the Iran-Armenia gas
pipeline (septel) and new thermal generation capacity. He
estimated that such assistance would amount to USD 540
million, not including any actual decommissioning costs of
the ANPP itself.

--------------
COSTS OF CLOSING ANPP EARLY ARE PROHIBITIVE
--------------


4. (C) Even if the GOAM is able to guarantee diverse sources
of fuel and energy, both Ministry of Energy officials and
visiting US-funded experts have pointed out that the costs of
closing ANPP early are nonetheless prohibitive. The GOAM has
set no money aside for actual decommissioning and spent fuel
disposal costs, which could amount to more than USD 850
million. Aside from decommissioning, the cost of moving from
cheap nuclear production, where Armenia bears neither the
original construction costs nor the costs for
decommissioning, to gas-fired generation or new nuclear
generation that includes the life-cycle costs could reach USD
100 million per year. This alone would be more than double
Armenia's total electricity generation costs.

-------------- --------------
GOAM PLANS TO OPERATE PLANT UNTIL 2016, MAYBE LONGER
-------------- --------------


5. (C) In the absence of donor assistance to establish
Armenia's energy security and generation needs, the Ministry
intends to run the plant at least until it has been used for
its thirty-year design life (until 2016). Nuclear experts
from the U.S. Department of Energy who work with the plant
have told us that there is no physical reason that the GOAM
could not operate the plant until 2025, assuming the Ministry
could pressure their friends at the Armenia Nuclear
Regulatory Agency into granting an extended license. Western
energy experts tell us that the plant is much safer now than
it was ten years ago (thanks to nearly USD 80 million in
foreign assistance, including USD 43 million from the USG),
but that continued operation will require more investment in
safety, especially training for a new, second generation of
personnel.

--------------
COMMENT: ANPP WILL REMAIN OPEN, NOW WHAT?
--------------


6. (C) Since missing the first decommissioning deadline in
2004, Armenia has been consistent in its position that it
will not set a decommissioning date until its has guaranteed
diversity in its electricity supply and reasonable end-user
electricity tariffs. The European Commission has floated the
same offer that Armenia rejected last year. The amounts that
Armenia needs to establish diverse supply, to cover the
higher of costs of non-nuclear generation, to replace its
aging thermal power plants, and to pay for the
decommissioning of the ANPP are daunting even if Armenia puts
off decommissioning another 15 years. American energy
experts say, and we agree, that there is no viable
alternative to operating ANPP at least until its planned life
expires in 2016. Accepting a deferred decommissioning, we
are encouraging Armenia to start now to assess
decommissioning costs and plan for its energy future. ANPP
will close someday, and Armenia will do well to tackle these
challenges early, in a transparent fashion, that responsibly
accounts for costs that are coming, inevitably, in the future.
EVANS