Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05WELLINGTON119
2005-02-10 23:49:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Wellington
Cable title:  

NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA DELAY STARTUP OF JOINT

Tags:  ETRD NZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 WELLINGTON 000119 

SIPDIS

STATE PASS USTR FOR BWEISEL AND DKATZ
STATE PASS FDA FOR OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL
PROGRAMS/RUSSELL CAMPBELL
STATE FOR EAP/ANP AND EB/TPP/BTA/ANA
COMMERCE FOR 4530/ITA/MAC/AP/OSAO/GPAINE

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12356: N/A
TAGS: ETRD NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA DELAY STARTUP OF JOINT
REGULATORY AGENCY

REF: 04 WELLINGTON 596

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 WELLINGTON 000119

SIPDIS

STATE PASS USTR FOR BWEISEL AND DKATZ
STATE PASS FDA FOR OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL
PROGRAMS/RUSSELL CAMPBELL
STATE FOR EAP/ANP AND EB/TPP/BTA/ANA
COMMERCE FOR 4530/ITA/MAC/AP/OSAO/GPAINE

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12356: N/A
TAGS: ETRD NZ
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA DELAY STARTUP OF JOINT
REGULATORY AGENCY

REF: 04 WELLINGTON 596


1. (SBU) Summary: New Zealand and Australia have agreed to delay
the startup of a joint agency to regulate therapeutic products in
both countries, after encountering difficulty in lining up
political backing for legislation necessary to set up the agency.
In New Zealand's case, that difficulty partly arises from the
coming national election. An adviser to New Zealand's health
minister fears a delay until after this year's election could
doom the trans-Tasman effort and force New Zealand to upgrade its
own regulatory regime, at a much higher cost. Meanwhile, the
industry believes itself to be in a stronger position to
influence the government to address its concerns about the
agency's fees and certification requirements. The New Zealand
government -- often criticized by business for having a tin ear
to its concerns -- may have to pay heed to industry this time.
End summary.


2. (U) The trans-Tasman agency had been scheduled for launch July
1 and now could be delayed until July 1, 2006, although it might
start earlier. It would regulate prescription pharmaceuticals as
well as other therapeutic goods, including medical devices and
health-care products that have gone virtually unregulated in New
Zealand (reftel).


3. (U) In New Zealand, industry's support for the joint agency
has been conditional. U.S. manufacturers of medical devices and
complementary medicines want the agency's costs to be addressed,
contending that the current plan to charge full cost-recovery
fees would harm their sales and put some of their distributors
out of business in New Zealand, where low operational costs have
allowed for generally lower prices than in Australia.
Pharmaceutical companies want assurances that the agency will not
be used as an excuse to ban direct-to-consumer advertising, which
some firms have used successfully in New Zealand. Such
advertising is prohibited in Australia and personally opposed by
New Zealand Minister of Health Annette King.


4. (U) Medical-device representatives also fear higher costs if
the agency follows through with plans to exclusively conduct all
conformity assessments -- audits of manufacturers and testing of
products to ensure they meet relevant standards. Such plans

would give the agency monopolistic powers, accompanied by
monopolistic costs, the representatives say. The agency also
presumably would follow the Australian practice of accepting CE,
or European, certification. The plans leave unresolved how the
agency would handle products having U.S. Food and Drug
Administration certification but not CE certification.


5. (SBU) With New Zealand's Labour government lacking sufficient
strength in Parliament to pass the implementing legislation
alone, it is turning to the industry for help in recruiting
support from the ranks of opposition parties. On January 24 and
February 10, Minister King made a pitch for help at meetings with
representatives of the pharmaceutical, medical devices, over-the-
counter medicines and complementary medicines sectors. The
representatives termed the meetings the "most positive" they have
had with the government since their discussions on the agency
began in 1998. With the government now acknowledging that it
needs the industry's backing, the representatives hope to take a
tougher line in pushing their concerns, whose resolution would
allow them to fully support the agency.


6. (SBU) Meanwhile, an adviser to Minister King said that the
delay in the agency's startup could jeopardize its future,
especially if legislation is not approved before the next
national elections, which must be held by September. For
example, Labour's ability to form another coalition government
may depend on support from the Green Party, which adamantly
opposes the agency because of fears about the loss of sovereignty
and the effect on consumers' health choices and access to dietary
supplements.


7. (SBU) Unable to agree on a joint statement on the delay, the
New Zealand and Australian governments issued separate
statements. The statements were released February 9 in Canberra
and February 10 in Wellington. According to Minister King's
office, Australian Parliamentary Secretary for Health Christopher
Pyne opposed Minister King's desire to state that the agency's
governance and accountability arrangements would be included in
the legislation rather than in regulations alone. (Minister King
did not mention the issue in her statement.)


8. (SBU) Comment: The dispute is emblematic of the difficulties
both governments face in attempting to harmonize their economies,
a goal of the Closer Economic Relations arrangement begun in

1983. The issue of "sovereignty" is extremely sensitive for the
relatively small New Zealand, just one-fifth the population of
Australia. Hence, Minister King would like the joint agency's
governance arrangements enshrined in legislation to address this
sensitivity. (Australian officials have griped privately that
New Zealand will have an equal number of representatives on the
agency's board, while Australia would shoulder most of the
startup costs.)


9. (SBU) The New Zealand government is also reportedly nervous
that Australia might become impatient and look elsewhere for a
partner. Australia, which is said to be seeking to position
itself as a hub for regulatory services in the Pacific region,
has held discussions with Canada on a possible joint regulatory
agency.

SWINDELLS