Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05WARSAW3422
2005-09-20 13:35:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Warsaw
Cable title:  

POLISH MINISTRY OF ECONOMY UNCONCERNED ABOUT

Tags:  ENRG PREL PL GM RS 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 WARSAW 003422 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/NCE DAVE KOSTELANCIK AND MICHAEL SESSUMS
STATE FOR EUR/SNEC STEVE MANN, EB/ESC JGARVERICK, EUR/ERA
USDOC FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/EUR/JBURGESS AND MWILSON
ENERGY FOR OASIA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/19/2015
TAGS: ENRG PREL PL GM RS
SUBJECT: POLISH MINISTRY OF ECONOMY UNCONCERNED ABOUT
RUSSIAN-GERMAN GAS PIPELINE

Classified By: Laura A. Griesmer, EconOff, Reasons 1.5(b,d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 WARSAW 003422

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EUR/NCE DAVE KOSTELANCIK AND MICHAEL SESSUMS
STATE FOR EUR/SNEC STEVE MANN, EB/ESC JGARVERICK, EUR/ERA
USDOC FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/EUR/JBURGESS AND MWILSON
ENERGY FOR OASIA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/19/2015
TAGS: ENRG PREL PL GM RS
SUBJECT: POLISH MINISTRY OF ECONOMY UNCONCERNED ABOUT
RUSSIAN-GERMAN GAS PIPELINE

Classified By: Laura A. Griesmer, EconOff, Reasons 1.5(b,d).


1. (C) Summary. Polish government officials responsible
for energy security are unconcerned about the recent
agreement between Germany and Russia to construct a gas
pipeline under the Baltic Sea despite almost daily news
articles about the proposed project. Our contacts concede
that the project is not in Poland's interests, but that
Poland has little influence over what they considered a
political decision aimed at providing Chancellor Schroeder
support before the German elections. They also question the
economics of the pipeline and whether it will be constructed.
End summary.

Public Speculation on Pipeline
--------------

2. (SBU) The Polish press has had almost daily articles
about the proposed gas pipeline between Russia and Germany
which would cross through the Baltic, bypassing normal
transit countries including Poland and Ukraine. Many here
see the pipeline as yet another example of Russia's
demonstration of power in the region. Center-right party
learders have also seized on the issue in the final days of
the parliamentary election campaign, pledging to "block" the
deal if possible. The issue was among the chief topics of
discussion at a recent televised debate among party leaders.

Ministry of Economy Unsurprised
--------------

3. (C) Econoffs met with Halina Trymucha, Director of
Energy Security in the Ministry of Economy to discuss her
Ministry's assessment of the new agreement. Trymucha
emphasized that the Ministry was not surprised about the
signing of the agreement, which had been discussed since

1998. She and other Ministry experts do not expect
construction to ever start, especially as feasability studies
are not available and construction costs will obviously be
extremely high. When asked if the construction of the
Blue-Stream pipeline from Russia to Turkey was a similar
example of a line that most experts felt technically and
commercially would never happen, Trymucha did not see a

correlation. She believes that the agreement was signed as a
gesture of support for Chancellor Schroeder and that
commercial requirements, once a feasability study is
completed, will kill the project. Deputy Minister of Economy
Malgorzta Ostrowska agreed that the pipeline is a business
and political decision, which Poland does not support.

Yamal II Update
--------------

4. (C) For its part, Poland has done everything it can to
work with Russia on building a second pipeline, Yamal II, in
the same right-of-way as Yamal I. In 2003, Polish and
Russian officials agreed that a governmental decision would
be made on Yamal II by the end of 2004. However, according
to Trymucha, the Russians placed conditions on the decision
that are almost impossible to meet including:
-- Completion of Yamal I. This condition has not been met
as construction was delayed a year and is now expected to be
completed by the end of 2005.
-- Clarification of the ownership of EuroPolGaz company.
Russia wants 50/50 ownership of the pipeline with no third
parties. Polish law at the time of the establishment of
EuroPolGaz required participation of at least three
shareholders. Russia is requesting that Gas Trading leave
the partnership that includes Gazprom and PGNiG.
-- Long-term gas contract clarification. Russia is offering
more gas than Poland requires and will not agree to re-export
of the gas to other European countries.


5. (C) An Inter-governmental committee on economic
cooperation was established in December 2004, with Minister
of Economy Piechota representing Poland and Minister Levitsky
representing Russian. Trymucha noted that the last meeting
occured in July and that the Russians now appear to be
waiting the outcome of Polish elections this fall to make
decisions. Working groups have continued to meet and the
next meeting of the energy sub-committee is scheduled for
September 19 to 30 to discuss the Yamal and Ambar feasability
studies. Representatives of the European Commission and
German Embassy are invited to the meetings. Trymucha believes
that for the projects to move forward the Lithuanian and
Latvian energy companies will need to become invovled. In
her opinion, while there's good communciation at the
administrative level with the two countries, there is no
cooperation on the part of the energy transmission companies,
which will be essential to moving the projects forward.

EU Not involved
--------------

6. (C) The European Union is not involved in the
Russia-German pipeline project and has no influence on it,
according to Trymucha. In 2003, Polish Minister of
Infrastructure Marek Pol initiated a debate on European gas
networks and requested feasability studies on the Yamal II
and Ambar pipelines. At that time, the Northern pipeline was
rejected by the EU. Piotr Serafin, Director of the
Department of Analyses and Strategies of the Office of the
Committee for European Integration told us that Poland raised
the pipeline in EU fora before joining, but has not been
active in opposing the project as Yamal II and Ambar were
given priority by the EC. Now that the EU might fund a
feasability study, he opined that Poland might get more
involved, preferring that scarce resources fund the other
studies.

More cooperation with Ukraine would be Positive
-------------- --

7. (C) Tighter cooperation between Poland and Ukraine on
gas and crude oil supplies would be a good idea agreed
Trymucha, but must be done in such a way that Russia does not
treat them as an act of retaliation. Both Poland and Ukraine
have the right to diversify sources of supply.

Comment
--------------

8. (C) Polish officials see the proposed North Baltic
pipeline as a politically motivated project that will not
hold up on commercial merits. This could be leading to a
false sense of comfort that the pipeline will never actually
be constructed. Working level meetings this week on Yamal II
and Ambar could result in some progress on those competing
routes. Otherwise, it will be up to commercial interests to
take the lead to construct a viable alternative.
Ashe