Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05VILNIUS1275
2005-12-05 11:30:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Vilnius
Cable title:  

PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM B1/B2 VISA VALIDATION

Tags:  CVIS KFRD LH 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 VILNIUS 001275 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR CA/VO/F/P, CA/FPP, EUR/NB
FRANKFURT FOR RSC-RCO RBROWN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS KFRD LH
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM B1/B2 VISA VALIDATION
STUDY FOR LITHUANIA

REF: VILNIUS 986

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 VILNIUS 001275

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR CA/VO/F/P, CA/FPP, EUR/NB
FRANKFURT FOR RSC-RCO RBROWN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS KFRD LH
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM B1/B2 VISA VALIDATION
STUDY FOR LITHUANIA

REF: VILNIUS 986


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: We have completed work on the first three
months of a year-long, B1/B2 validation study. Two percent
of our randomly selected applicants during this period did
not return, while another one percent remain as suspected
yet unconfirmed overstays. While this preliminary data
does not constitute a statistically valid study, we are
nonetheless pleasantly surprised by the result and will be
keen to see if this data reflects a genuine decrease in
Lithuanian overstays. At the same time, we realize that
our validation study will not capture some instances of
visa misuse, such as those who work illegally during their
visits to the United States and those who use their visas
to immigrate to America at some time in the future. END
SUMMARY.

--------------
Three Months of Year-Long Study Complete
--------------


2. (U) We have completed the first three months of our
validation study on all issued B1/B2 visas for Lithuanian
applicants during the year-long period between November
2004 and October 2005 (reftel). This study will provide us
with an approximate overstay rate, within a small margin of
error, for all Lithuanian business and tourist visitors
over an extensive period of time. We are implementing this
validation study in a "rolling" fashion -- i.e., we are
performing checks continuously, rather than all at one-time
-- and are therefore able to review results while the study
is ongoing.


3. (U) We issued a total of 3,492 B1/B2 visas to Lithuanian
citizens during the year-long period of the study.
Although the actual number of issuances during the year-
long period was somewhat lower than our earlier estimate,
we will in the end have a total sample size of just over
700, comfortably more than the minimum required sample size
of 682. We issued 678 B1/B2 visas during the first three
months of the study period (November 2004 - January 2005).
Using the methodology described reftel, we set our sampling
interval at 1/5 and drew a random sample of 137 cases
during these first three months.

--------------
Low Overstay Rate, So Far
--------------


4. (SBU) The following is a breakdown of the results from
the first three months of the study:

Confirmed Returned - 102
Did Not Travel - 30

Confirmed Did Not Return - 3
Insufficient Data (Still investigating) - 2
-------------- -
Total Sample Size - 137


5. (U) We note that these results reflect only applicants
from the November 2004 - January 2005 period and cannot be
extrapolated to draw conclusions regarding applicants for
the entire year. Only the complete study will provide data
for the year-long period, and include a much larger sample
to make the results statistically valid with a standard
error of less than five percent at a 95 percent confidence
interval. These preliminary results, while useful, cannot
provide us a statistically valid overstay rate with any
level of confidence.


6. (SBU) Two percent of our randomly selected applicants --
three individuals -- were confirmed to have not returned.
An additional one percent could not be conclusively
determined, and can be considered suspected overstays until
we complete our investigation of the cases. A surprisingly
large percentage, 22 percent, did not travel even 10 months
after receiving visas. We were able to determine most
cases by telephone calls to the applicants themselves,
although in some cases we also used the mail and contacted
employers to double-check results or investigate further.

--------------
Some Initial Conclusions
--------------


7. (SBU) Although it is difficult to draw substantive
conclusions with such a small sample size, the low number
of overstays thus far is surprising. We are keen to see if
this preliminary data reflects a genuine decrease in
overstays from Lithuania.


8. (SBU) Two of the three confirmed overstays were retired
women visiting relatives in the United States, a profile
matching a persistently large number of our visa
applicants. The third confirmed overstay and both of the
cases for which we have insufficient data are young cruise
line employees, who are by nature more itinerant and whose
return is more difficult to confirm.

--------------
Concerns Regarding Study Results
--------------

9. (U) Work during this initial period has also revealed
some concerns regarding the results of our validation
study. Any validation study, even one conducted for
applicants over an extensive period, generally poses only
one primary question: at a reasonable time after receiving
a visa, did a particular applicant return to his/her home
country? Anecdotal evidence from the interviewing window,
however, tells us that many Lithuanians use their B1/B2
visas not to immigrate permanently to the United States,
but to work illegally for up to six months out of the year
in order to bolster their meager income back home. Yet a
validation study records such an offender as a "Confirmed
Return," since he/she generally would have returned by the
time of the study and because we usually cannot determine
whether the person in question engaged in illegal work
while in the United States. Our preliminary data does not
dispel this concern, as nine percent of our confirmed
returns admitted to staying significantly longer, usually
five to six months, than they claimed they would when
applying for the visa.


10. (U) Anecdotal evidence also indicates that other
Lithuanians who use B1/B2 visas to move permanently to the
United States do not always do so immediately after
receiving their visas. We have seen cases involving
Lithuanians who wait up to several years with a valid B1/B2
visa (usually valid for 10 years) before moving to America
to reside illegally or seek a change of status. We
therefore are left only to wonder how many of the 22
percent of applicants who did not travel, and how many of
those who returned after their first trip, will use their
visas to move permanently to the United States at some more
convenient time in the future. Two of the three applicants
who did not return, and both of the suspected but
unconfirmed overstays, had previously traveled to the
United States. Given the complex nature of Lithuanian
emigration patterns, therefore, we recognize that our
validation study may not catch a significant portion of
visa misuse by Lithuanian citizens.

MULL