Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05VIENNA3407
2005-10-19 14:25:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Vienna
Cable title:
UNESCO CULTURAL DIVERSITY VOTE -- URGENT DEMARCHE
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 191425Z Oct 05
UNCLAS VIENNA 003407
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR IO/UNESCO AND EUR/AGS - VIKMANIS-KELLER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD PHUM SCUL AU UNESCO
SUBJECT: UNESCO CULTURAL DIVERSITY VOTE -- URGENT DEMARCHE
DELIVERED TO AUSTRIA
REF: A. (A) STATE 192656
B. (B) VIENNA 3397 AND PREVIOUS
This cable is Sensitive But Unclassified. Please treat
accordingly.
UNCLAS VIENNA 003407
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR IO/UNESCO AND EUR/AGS - VIKMANIS-KELLER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD PHUM SCUL AU UNESCO
SUBJECT: UNESCO CULTURAL DIVERSITY VOTE -- URGENT DEMARCHE
DELIVERED TO AUSTRIA
REF: A. (A) STATE 192656
B. (B) VIENNA 3397 AND PREVIOUS
This cable is Sensitive But Unclassified. Please treat
accordingly.
1. (U) Upon receipt of ref (a),Embassy formally delivered
the diplomatic note on the UNESCO Cultural Diversity
Convention to the Austrian government, via the Foreign
Ministry. EconPolCouns and Econ Unit Chief concurrently
delivered copies of the diplomatic note and ref (a) talking
points to senior officials in the Foreign and Economics
Ministries, respectively.
2. (U) Frieda Luggauer-Gollner, the MFA's Assistant
Secretary-level Director for Multilateral Foreign Cultural
SIPDIS
and UNESCO Affairs, expressed appreciation for our efforts to
make our views clear. Luggauer-Gollner noted that Austria
has supported the concept of the Cultural Diversity
Convention since the idea first arose. In conjunction with
other EU member states and with other members of UNESCO,
Austria has worked closely on the development of the current
text. The draft convention reflects a long period of serious
discussions. Austria "fully supports" the text which has
emerged.
3. (SBU) Luggauer-Gollner said that Austria considered
paragraph 2 of Article 20 of the draft convention to prevent
an interpretation of the Cultural Diversity Convention as
taking precedence over other international agreements.
(Note: The relevant language states, "Nothing in this
Convention shall be interpreted as modifying rights and
obligations of the Parties under any other treaties to which
they are parties." End note.) We urged Luggauer-Gollner to
instruct the Austrian delegation to make a statement to this
effect in order to clarify the record for future
interpretation. Luggauer-Gollner undertook to discuss our
request with Austria's interagency community.
4. (SBU) Gabriela Habermayer, the head of the Ministry of
Economics and Labor's Multilateral Trade Affairs Division,
told us that Austria believed the Cultural Diversity
Convention and WTO obligations did not conflict, but were
mutually supportive. Pressed, she agreed that the French
Culture Minister's statements about the precedence of the
Cultural Diversity Convention could presage an attempt on the
part of France and others to use the convention as a lever in
WTO discussions. However, she believed this would be certain
to fail in the face of the existing consensus on the nature
and scope of the convention.
van Voorst
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
STATE FOR IO/UNESCO AND EUR/AGS - VIKMANIS-KELLER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD PHUM SCUL AU UNESCO
SUBJECT: UNESCO CULTURAL DIVERSITY VOTE -- URGENT DEMARCHE
DELIVERED TO AUSTRIA
REF: A. (A) STATE 192656
B. (B) VIENNA 3397 AND PREVIOUS
This cable is Sensitive But Unclassified. Please treat
accordingly.
1. (U) Upon receipt of ref (a),Embassy formally delivered
the diplomatic note on the UNESCO Cultural Diversity
Convention to the Austrian government, via the Foreign
Ministry. EconPolCouns and Econ Unit Chief concurrently
delivered copies of the diplomatic note and ref (a) talking
points to senior officials in the Foreign and Economics
Ministries, respectively.
2. (U) Frieda Luggauer-Gollner, the MFA's Assistant
Secretary-level Director for Multilateral Foreign Cultural
SIPDIS
and UNESCO Affairs, expressed appreciation for our efforts to
make our views clear. Luggauer-Gollner noted that Austria
has supported the concept of the Cultural Diversity
Convention since the idea first arose. In conjunction with
other EU member states and with other members of UNESCO,
Austria has worked closely on the development of the current
text. The draft convention reflects a long period of serious
discussions. Austria "fully supports" the text which has
emerged.
3. (SBU) Luggauer-Gollner said that Austria considered
paragraph 2 of Article 20 of the draft convention to prevent
an interpretation of the Cultural Diversity Convention as
taking precedence over other international agreements.
(Note: The relevant language states, "Nothing in this
Convention shall be interpreted as modifying rights and
obligations of the Parties under any other treaties to which
they are parties." End note.) We urged Luggauer-Gollner to
instruct the Austrian delegation to make a statement to this
effect in order to clarify the record for future
interpretation. Luggauer-Gollner undertook to discuss our
request with Austria's interagency community.
4. (SBU) Gabriela Habermayer, the head of the Ministry of
Economics and Labor's Multilateral Trade Affairs Division,
told us that Austria believed the Cultural Diversity
Convention and WTO obligations did not conflict, but were
mutually supportive. Pressed, she agreed that the French
Culture Minister's statements about the precedence of the
Cultural Diversity Convention could presage an attempt on the
part of France and others to use the convention as a lever in
WTO discussions. However, she believed this would be certain
to fail in the face of the existing consensus on the nature
and scope of the convention.
van Voorst