Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05VIENNA1935
2005-06-10 09:28:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Vienna
Cable title:  

EU FOREIGN MINISTERS' MEETING AND EU CUBA POLICY:

Tags:  PREL PHUM PARM IR IZ LE YI CM CU AU EUN 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L VIENNA 001935 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/ERA AND EUR/AGS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM PARM IR IZ LE YI CM CU AU EUN
SUBJECT: EU FOREIGN MINISTERS' MEETING AND EU CUBA POLICY:
AUSTRIAN RESPONSE

REF: A) STATE 105235 B) STATE 102505 C) VIENNA 1740

D) VIENNA 1826

Classified By: ACTING DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION GREGORY E. PHILLIPS
REASONS: 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L VIENNA 001935

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/ERA AND EUR/AGS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM PARM IR IZ LE YI CM CU AU EUN
SUBJECT: EU FOREIGN MINISTERS' MEETING AND EU CUBA POLICY:
AUSTRIAN RESPONSE

REF: A) STATE 105235 B) STATE 102505 C) VIENNA 1740

D) VIENNA 1826

Classified By: ACTING DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION GREGORY E. PHILLIPS
REASONS: 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (SBU) Embassy delivered ref (a) points on the upcoming
GAERC to Austrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on June 7.
Embassy delivered ref (b) points on Cuba on June 3. Pol Unit
chief then discussed the issues on June 8 with Andreas
Riecken, MFA Coordinator for EU Common Foreign and Security
Policy.


2. (C) BALKANS/KOSOVO: Riecken thanked us for the copies of
Under Secretary Burns' testimony and speech. He said that
the focus during the GAERC would be on Kosovo. The standards
review would soon result in a need to consider the "the
post-UNSC 1244 period." Austria was prepared to tackle the
organization of a Thessaloniki follow-up conference during
its EU presidency, but only if there were realistic prospects
for success. The Commission was encouraging Austria to plan
for such a conference, he added.


3. (SBU) IRAN: Riecken told us that Iran was not on the
agenda for the June 13 GAERC but would figure in the
Conclusions of the EU Summit on June 16-17. He added that
there was complete agreement between the EU and the U.S. on
the need for Iran to abandon its uranium enrichment program.


4. (SBU) LEBANON: Riecken told us that Lebanon was not an
agenda item for the GAERC, and that the current draft of the
Conclusions for the EU Summit did not address Lebanon, "but
that could change, depending on new developments."


5. (SBU) IRAQ: Riecken said Austria appreciated the
importance of the U.S.-EU sponsored conference, and confirmed
that Foreign Minister Plassnik was planning to attend (ref c).


6. (SBU) U.S.-EU SUMMIT: Austria was following developments
closely in preparation for its assumption of the Presidency
in January 2006, Riecken said. We commented that there may
be some decisions taken at the June 20 Summit in Washington
with a reporting date for follow-up at the 2006 Summit.


7. (C) CHINA ARMS EMBARGO: We emphasized that the Code of
Conduct would not be a substitute for the Embargo, and that a
lift would have serious repercussions. Riecken commented
that the Luxembourgers, "like star pupils," were trying to
complete action on a goal they had set for their presidency.
However, Riecken confided, he did not see any consensus on a
lift emerging now, and also doubted strongly that the UK
presidency would push the issue. This made it more likely
that the problem would land on Austria's desk in 2006, he
added.


8. (C) EU CUBA POLICY (ref b): Riecken commented that the
PSC, COREPER, and the GAERC would all consider this issue
over the next few days, but that finding a consensus would be
difficult. The Spanish wanted to be most accommodating to
the Cuban regime, while the Czechs were holding out for a
harder line. All member states regretted the actions the
Cuban government had taken to prevent attendance at the
opposition meeting on May 20 - but some felt that it was a
positive sign that the regime had allowed the meeting to take
place at all. Riecken thought that neither the common
measures nor their later suspension had produced the positive
effects the EU had sought. It might be preferable for EU
member states to calibrate their own responses to Castro's
oppressive measures (ref d) -- rather than lock them into a
lowest-common-denominator position.
Brown