Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05VIENNA1793
2005-06-01 13:52:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Vienna
Cable title:  

DEMARCHE TO AUSTRIA: SA/LW NEGOTIATIONS ON

Tags:  PREL AU PREM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L VIENNA 001793 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR PM/WRA - PICO AND EUR/AGS - VIKMANIS-KELLER

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/01/2015
TAGS: PREL AU PREM
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE TO AUSTRIA: SA/LW NEGOTIATIONS ON
MARKING AND TRACING

REF: STATE 99866

Classified By: Economic-Political Counselor Gregory E. Phillips. Reaso
ns: 1.4 (c) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L VIENNA 001793

SIPDIS

STATE FOR PM/WRA - PICO AND EUR/AGS - VIKMANIS-KELLER

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/01/2015
TAGS: PREL AU PREM
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE TO AUSTRIA: SA/LW NEGOTIATIONS ON
MARKING AND TRACING

REF: STATE 99866

Classified By: Economic-Political Counselor Gregory E. Phillips. Reaso
ns: 1.4 (c) and (d).


1. (SBU) EconPolCouns presented reftel points on June 1 to
Norbert Hack, the Austrian Foreign Ministry's assistant
secretary-level Director of the Disarmament and

SIPDIS
Non-Proliferation Department. Hack will represent Austria at
the June 6-17 negotiating session in New York.


2. (C) Hack said Austria subscribed to the EU consensus on
the draft text. Austria's positions on the issues are as
follows:

-- Legally binding vs. political document: In keeping with
the EU consensus, Austria wants the instrument to be legally
binding. Hack said, "I don't think there's flexibility on
the EU's part" on this issue. Hack said the EU feared that
an instrument which was not legally binding would have no
effect on national policy. Beyond that, Hack argued, if the
instrument were merely a political document, many countries
might treat it as a political substitute for the Firearms
Protocol, and would not ratify the latter document.

-- Ammunition: Austria, like the rest of the EU, thinks the
instrument should deal with ammunition. This could, however,
be in the form of an annex or a protocol "on a voluntary
basis." Hack noted that the Firearms Protocol deals with
ammunition as well. He acknowledged that the issue of how to
mark ammunition was "difficult."

-- Record keeping: Hack said Austria agreed with our
position that 30 year retention was unrealistic, and thought
ten years might be better.

-- Marking: The EU position "goes beyond the U.S.
position," Hack asserted.


3. (C) On the end game, we stressed, and Hack agreed, that
there should be a consensus document. Hack said he very much
hoped there could be a resolution of outstanding issues in
the upcoming session of the OEWG. Concerning consultations
among participating states, he said the EU participants had
naturally coordinated their positions. We argued that if
there was to be a consensus document, those participating in
the negotiating session had to be in a position to enter into
a real give and take, even if they came to the table with
instructions based upon an EU consensus. Hack said he
believed the EU member state representatives would indeed be
able to hammer out an agreement. Hack agreed that an
instrument without the agreement of all the participants --
especially the U.S. -- would be "worthless."
Brown