Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05TELAVIV652
2005-02-03 14:21:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Tel Aviv
Cable title:  

MAZUZ ABSENTEE PROPERTY LAW DECISION RILES

pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS TEL AVIV 000652 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL KWBG IS JE GOI INTERNAL ISRAELI PALESTINIAN AFFAIRS
SUBJECT: MAZUZ ABSENTEE PROPERTY LAW DECISION RILES
SHARANSKY AND NETANYAHU


UNCLAS TEL AVIV 000652

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL KWBG IS JE GOI INTERNAL ISRAELI PALESTINIAN AFFAIRS
SUBJECT: MAZUZ ABSENTEE PROPERTY LAW DECISION RILES
SHARANSKY AND NETANYAHU



1. (SBU) The Absentee Property Law controversy continued to
receive press play February 3, although at a less intense
level than previously. AG Mazuz's January 31 decision to
overturn application the Absentee Property Law (APL) to East
Jerusalem led to a predictable outcry by Ministers Sharansky
and Netanyahu. Sharansky panned the AG and his staff for
sloppy work, noting "Your objections (to the law) ought to
have been made in real time, not several months later, after
the matter was publicized in the media." According to a
February 3 Ha'aretz article, Netanyahu argued that "The
decision... merely sought 'to restore the status quo ante'
after the Barak government scrapped Israel's long-standing
position that East Jerusalem is part of its capital.
'Jerusalem is united,' he said. 'That is how it should be.
That's what sovereignty means. Just as Arab West Bank
residents have no real foothold in sovereign (Israeli)
territory, they have no real foothold in sovereign Jerusalem
territory.'"


2. (SBU) Editorials in a range of Israeli newspapers,
including Yediot Achronot, Maariv, and Globes, all criticized
the 2004 government decision to apply actively the APL in
East Jerusalem. They highlighted the fact that two ministers
could take such a momentous decision with virtually no
oversight, and with no public announcement of their decision,
as well as what Yedioth refers to as its real effect of
"robbing" land from Palestinian owners.


3. (SBU) A number of sources have implied that Mazuz may not
have the last word. A February 2 Ha'aretz editorial
supporting the Mazuz decision says "Hopefully, the government
will respect the attorney general's decision and not try to
change it with legislation." Netanyahu is quoted in the
February 3 article mentioned above as saying that he will
"clarify the matter with the AG; I hope he will accept my
position." Lastly, a February 3 press release by the Israeli
NGO B'Tselem notes that, although Mazuz did reverse the 2004
government decision, "in individual cases the threat of
confiscation (of absentee land) remains."

--------------
Comment
--------------


4. (SBU) Netanyahu's comments about the purported status of
Jerusalem and the actions of the Barak government miss the
point (either through lack or knowledge or in spite of it) of
Mazuz's decision, which is that the original 1950 law was not
designed to be applied to areas claimed by Israel after the
law was first enacted.


5. (SBU) B'Tselem is correct that, even according to the
Mazuz decision, East Jerusalem land can be seized under the
APL. As a result of the application of all GOI law to East
Jerusalem after the Six Day war, the APL by default applies
there as well. The key fact of the decision, however, is
that it clearly takes decision-making power on seizures away
from the fairly obscure Custodian of Absentee Property in the
Finance Ministry and puts it squarely in the hands of the AG.


6. (SBU) Mission is working to obtain further information
from the GOI about whether, and how, Mazuz's January 31
decision could be changed, either through legislation or
through other means.

********************************************* ********************
Visit Embassy Tel Aviv's Classified Website:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/telaviv

You can also access this site through the State Department's
Classified SIPRNET website.
********************************************* ********************
KURTZER