Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05TELAVIV4564
2005-07-21 09:46:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Tel Aviv
Cable title:  

ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

Tags:  IS KMDR MEDIA REACTION REPORT 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 TEL AVIV 004564

SIPDIS

STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD

WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM
NSC FOR NEA STAFF

JERUSALEM ALSO FOR ICD
LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL
PARIS ALSO FOR POL
ROME FOR MFO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: IS KMDR MEDIA REACTION REPORT
SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

--------------
SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT:
--------------

Mideast

--------------
Key stories in the media:
--------------

Leading media reported that Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice is due here this evening for a two-day
visit to Israel and the PA. Ha'aretz says that the
visit is aimed at demonstrating America's involvement
on the eve of disengagement and strengthening efforts
at coordination between Israel and the PA. The media
reported that for the first time, Secretary Rice will
visit PM Sharon at his Sycamore Ranch home tomorrow.
She will confer with FM Silvan Shalom tonight, with
Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz on Friday, and with Vice
Premier Shimon Peres on Sunday morning. Ha'aretz
reported that on Wednesday, Deputy National Security
Advisor Elliott Abrams and A/S David Welch arrived in
Jerusalem to prepare for the visit. Ha'aretz writes
that officials in Washington had raised the possibility
that Rice would try to arrange a meeting between Sharon
and PA Chairman [President] Mahmoud Abbas, but that the
idea was coolly received in Jerusalem. The newspaper
says that Sharon made it clear he would meet Abbas only
after the pullout was completed, and that the Americans
have now dropped the subject.

All media reported that thousands of anti-disengagement
activists reluctantly headed home last night after
being prevented from marching toward Gush Katif.
Israel Radio cited a police assessment that this
morning, 1,500 people were staying behind in Kfar
Maimon, where the march stopped. Ha'aretz quoted IDF
sources as saying that right-wing activists are
slipping into Gush Katif while the army's attention is
focused on Kfar Maimon.

A spokeswoman for USAID was quoted as saying Wednesday,
in an interview with Jerusalem Post, that the USG is
willing to pay some USD 8 to 10 million to buy the Gaza
settlers' hothouses and give them to the Palestinians
to save the jobs of some 4,000 Palestinians who work
there. Jerusalem Post quoted Sharon spokesman Raanan
Gissin as saying that Sharon supports the pending sale,
which is being brokered by Peres. The newspaper writes
that Peres has been working on the sale in advance of
Secretary Rice's arrival to the country. According to

SIPDIS
Jerusalem Post, Gissin added that no formal government

approval was needed. Hamodi'a reported that on
Wednesday, Peres mentioned the understanding to a
Sharon-headed ministerial committee dealing with
disengagement. Speaking on Israel Radio this morning,
Agriculture Minister Yisrael Katz (Likud) attacked
Peres for defending the Palestinians' interests, rather
than Israel's.

All media reported that the opponents of the
disengagement plan sustained what Ha'aretz dubs a
"bitter defeat" on Wednesday, when three attempts to
delay the disengagement from Gaza by several months
failed by a large majority. Those bill proposals were
all rejected, 69-43, 69-41, and 69-40. Ha'aretz
reported that Sharon declined to comment on Finance
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's absence from the votes.
Jerusalem Post reported that Sharon decided not to fire
Netanyahu over the issue.

All media reported that IDF Chief of Staff Dan Halutz
approved a series of steps this week to harshen
disciplinary measures against refuseniks ahead of the
disengagement plan. Halutz said that a soldier
convicted of refusing an order would no longer be
allowed to serve as a combat soldier, and that
refuseniks would be sentenced to prison.

Ha'aretz reported that the Palestinian government has
allocated USD 10 million for connecting the settlements
that are due to be evacuated in the Gaza Strip and the
West Bank, and the areas surrounding them, to the PA's
energy and transportation infrastructures.

PA Civil Affairs Minister Muhammad Dahlan was quoted as
saying this week, in an interview with Ha'aretz, that
Hamas is trying to carry out a military coup against
the PA. He was also quoted as saying that Sharon and
Hamas have the same goal: destroying the PA. Maariv
reported that a popular army comprised of thousands of
Hamas activists ("Murabitun") is poised to conquer the
Gaza Strip and to overthrow the PA after the
disengagement. Leading media reported that Fatah and
Hamas clashed on Wednesday, despite the agreement
reached between the groups on Tuesday.

Leading media reported that two settlers are suspected
of having stabbed to death a 13-year-old Palestinian
boy near the settlement of Shilo Wednesday. However,
the Ha'aretz web site and other media later reported
that senior Palestinian figures told IDF officials that
the boy was likely murdered within the context of a
clan feud.

Jerusalem Post cited the results of a Tel Aviv
University poll conducted earlier this week:
-75 percent of Israelis surveyed said they believed the
disengagement would take place.
-57 percent of the public thought that "in retrospect"
Israel should not have established any settlements in
Gaza, while only 37 percent agreed that it was
necessary to do so.

--------------
Mideast:
--------------

Summary:
--------------
Columnist Ari Shavit wrote in independent, left-leaning
Ha'aretz: "[The pro-disengagement] camp must give the
disengagement valid significance.... [The anti-
disengagement] camp must overcome its sense of mourning
and realize that the die is cast."

Veteran journalist Yaron London wrote in the editorial
of mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot: "The
process is familiar from other countries that
established colonies. The clearest example is 'French
Algeria,' which tried to bring about the collapse of
the republic."

Editor-in-Chief Gonen Ginat wrote on page one of
nationalist, Orthodox Hatzofe: "Nothing can be expected
from a corrupt dictator who sold his country in order
to dodge an indictment."

Ultra-Orthodox Yated Ne'eman editorialized: "The White
House, which views itself, and justly so, as the
sponsor of the diplomatic processes in the region, is
incapable of helping either Sharon or Abu Mazen in this
situation."

Block Quotes:
--------------


I. "Blue and Orange at the Red Line"

Columnist Ari Shavit wrote in independent, left-leaning
Ha'aretz (July 21): "The Prime Minister has not yet
bothered to explain which profound insight lies at the
basis of the disengagement plan.... There are a mere
few weeks left. The [pro-disengagement] blue camp must
come to its senses. It must grant a humane and moral
dimension to the historic move; it must give the
disengagement valid significance. It must look in the
eye those whose world it is about to destroy and speak
to them. The [anti-disengagement] orange camp too must
come to its senses. It must overcome its sense of
mourning and realize that the die is cast. There will
indeed be disengagement. The orange camp must now curb
the rebellion, revolt, and refusal spreading among its
grieving members. It must ensure that the inevitable
division of the Land of Israel [Israel, including the
territories] will not tear asunder the people of Israel
and will not shake the State of Israel. Under no
circumstances must the orange camp cross the red line."

II. "The State of Judea, Samaria and Gaza"

Veteran journalist Yaron London wrote in the editorial
of mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot (July
21): "The settler leaders in the territories speak to
the authorities as though they were the representatives
of a foreign state. In their rogue state live a people
that has developed its own laws and separated from the
hegemonic state in its ways of life and beliefs....
Before our eyes, the old warning of the opponents of
occupation is coming true, i.e. that the settlers'
state would gain strength and when put to the test
would rebel against the State of Israel. This was to
be expected, since the process is familiar from other
countries that established colonies. The clearest
example is 'French Algeria,' which tried to bring about
the collapse of the republic. All the warnings against
rash comparisons between what happened in France 50
years ago and what is happening in our home are
shattering in the face of the sights in southern
Israel.... Like [the colonists in Algeria], the
settlers say that instead of compromising with the
Muslims, we should 'let the army win,' and like them,
'extremists' in the rebel camp plot to attack Muslims
so that all of the national energy will be dedicated to
defense against an all-out attack.... And as in France
in the mid-20th century, here too: The excited calls
for national unity and national responsibility should
be accompanied by a demonstration of the state's
power."

III. "The Dictator Who Quashed Democracy Is to Blame
For the Violence"

Editor-in-Chief Gonen Ginat wrote on page one of
nationalist, Orthodox Hatzofe (July 21): "Should, God
forbid, violent clashes occur [among Israelis], someone
would be responsible for them. It is a reckless
dictator who spat on the voters. Ariel Sharon is the
culprit -- not the only one, but the main one. If
there is violence, it will be the direct consequence of
that spit on democracy. It is inevitable to recall the
following: there were democratic elections in Israel;
in those elections, the public clearly and
unequivocally decided against the current direction....
A person who quashes democracy begets violence. Had
Sharon been a responsible human being -- and he is
neither a human being nor someone responsible -- he
would have said that he changed his mind: let's try
elections or a referendum.... Nothing can be expected
from a corrupt dictator who sold his country in order
to dodge an indictment."

IV. "The Threshold of Washington's Mediating Ability"

Ultra-Orthodox Yated Ne'eman editorialized (July 21):
"The situation [in this region] isn't totally under
control -- on either of the sides. While Sharon is
acting under the increasing sense of an internal rift,
the Palestinian Authority is finding it hard to control
Hamas and Islamic Jihad. The White House, which views
itself, and justly so, as the sponsor of the diplomatic
processes in the region, is incapable of helping either
Sharon or Abu Mazen in this situation. The tension in
the air and the feeling of uncertainty, which have
turned into key features of the Middle East, no longer
are only the consequence of conflicts between
neighboring nations, but also of discords within
regimes. Washington now feels that even a regional
peace conference would be considered a plan that could
be easier to implement than an intra-Israeli mediation
between Sharon and the Yesha Council of Jewish
Settlements in the Territories and his opponents with
in the Likud, or, in a totally different context,
between the warring factions in the PA."

KURTZER