Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05TAIPEI4764
2005-11-30 22:55:00
UNCLASSIFIED
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

TAIWAN ISSUES TAMIFLU COMPULSORY LICENSE, BUT DOES

Tags:  ETRD ECON KIPR TW ESTH IPR 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

302255Z Nov 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 004764 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/RSP/TC ADN EB/TPP/MTA/IPC, STATE PASS AIT/W
AND USTR, USTR FOR WINTERS AND WINELAND, USDOC FOR
4431/ITA/MAX/AP/OPB/TAIWAN/MBMORGAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR TW ESTH IPR
SUBJECT: TAIWAN ISSUES TAMIFLU COMPULSORY LICENSE, BUT DOES
IT MATTER?


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 004764

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/RSP/TC ADN EB/TPP/MTA/IPC, STATE PASS AIT/W
AND USTR, USTR FOR WINTERS AND WINELAND, USDOC FOR
4431/ITA/MAX/AP/OPB/TAIWAN/MBMORGAN

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECON KIPR TW ESTH IPR
SUBJECT: TAIWAN ISSUES TAMIFLU COMPULSORY LICENSE, BUT DOES
IT MATTER?



1. Summary: Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO)
Deputy Director General Jack Lu announced late November 25
that Taiwan would grant the Taiwan Department of Health (DOH)
a restricted license to produce Tamiflu, despite the fact
that negotiations between DOH and patent-holder Roche were
on-going. The Taiwan government justified its decision to
issue the compulsory license by claiming Roche was unable to
provided Taiwan with sufficient doses of the Avian Influenza
(AI) treatment to meet World Health Organization (WHO)
recommended guidelines. The license requires DOH to first
exhaust Roche-produced stock of Tamiflu before distributing
locally manufactured medicine and prohibits the export of
product manufactured under the license. Roche's spokesperson
insisted the company could meet Taiwan demand and charged
that Taiwan's drug manufacturers did not have the
technological capability to produce the drug. End Summary.


2. Following several months of negotiations between Taiwan's
DOH and Swiss drug-manufacturer Roche over supply of AI
treatment Tamiflu, discussions which included the licensing
of local production, TIPO announced November 25 that it would
license DOH to produce a copy of the drug. However, TIPO's
announcement stipulated that locally produced versions would
be solely for domestic use and would be used only in the
event that supplies of Roche-produced Tamiflu were exhausted.
Roche's spokesperson countered in the press that Taiwan
lacked the technical capability to produce Tamiflu. She
insisted that Roche would be able to provide Taiwan with the
necessary supply.

===============================
Taiwan Seeking Self-sufficiency
===============================


3. According to TIPO's Director of International Affairs
Bennet Chen, Taiwan currently has only enough Tamiflu in
stock to treat less than 1% of the population, well below the
WHO recommended stockpile of 10% of the population (2.3
million doses for Taiwan.) It was only after several months
of negotiations with Roche that DOH on October 313 applied to

TIPO for a compulsory license of Roche's patent, he said.
After much discussion within TIPO, it was decide to grant a
conditional license valid until December 2007 or until a
licensing agreement is concluded between Taiwan and Roche.


4. DOH Bureau of Pharmaceutical Affairs Director General
Liao Chi-chow told AIT that Roche had promised to provide
Taiwan with 2.3 million doses of Tamiflu by June 2006, but
that Taiwan health officials were concerned that the most
dangerous period for AI infections was likely to be between
January and March of 2006. Roche had been adamantly opposed
to licensing Tamiflu production to a Taiwan manufacturer,
Liao said. Given the global demand for Tamiflu, he doubted
that Roche would be able to meet its commitment and dismissed
Roche's pledge as empty talk.


5. Liao insisted that Taiwan has four or five manufacturers
that are technically capable of producing Tamiflu. He
predicted that DOH would conduct an open tender for Tamiflu
production in January. Liao was uncertain when locally
manufactured product might be available for the Taiwan
market. When asked how DOH planned to ensure that the local
production of the drug did not leak onto the market or out of
Taiwan, he responded that the Taiwan Center for Disease
Control (Taiwan CDC) would maintain the stockpile in their
warehouse and would be responsible for the security of the
product.

=============================
TIPO Tries to Divide the Baby
=============================


6. TIPO DDG Lu noted that Taiwan's decision was fully in
compliance with Article 31 of the TRIPS Agreement and that
use of locally produced Tamiflu would be strictly limited and
controlled by DOH. Lu suggested that TIPO had done its best
to respect Roche's patent rights by requiring DOH to first
deplete its stock of Tamiflu before turning to locally
produced drugs and by prohibiting the export of any drugs
produced under the compulsory license. Negotiations between
Roche and DOH over compensation and continued purchases of
Tamiflu were continuing, he said. Given the potential human
cost of an AI pandemic, TIPO decided it was better to issue
the license to DOH for local manufacture and restrict the
usage of the resulting product. This was their attempt at a
compromise solution, offered Lu. That the announcement came
just days before important local elections, he claimed, was
purely coincidental.

=============================
Comment: A Perplexing Outcome
=============================


7. Roche announced November 26 that the Indonesian
government was free to produce Tamiflu without a license and
followed with similar announcements November 28 regarding
Thailand and the Philippines. In these countries, Roche had
reportedly not filed a patent and therefore claimed not to
have any patent protection. However, Roche's willingness to
cede the field in these countries, all potentially larger
markets than Taiwan, makes the inability of the two sides to
come to an agreement in Taiwan puzzling. TIPO has
spearheaded a drive to improve intellectual property rights
protection in Taiwan over the past several years, but has
also shown a willingness to use TRIPS Article 31 to allow the
use of patents without the authorization of the rightsholder
in certain instances. Taiwan issued a compulsory license for
patents to produce CD-Rs in July 2004 after years of
negotiations between patent holder Philips and local optical
disk manufacturers over royalty payments broke down, but
resisted doing so when Taiwan peer-to-peer file sharing
service Kuro claimed it was unable to reach a negotiated
royalty plan with the International Federation of
Phonographic Industries (IFPI).


8. Equally perplexing is how Taiwan plans to provide locally
produced Tamiflu in time to make a difference. DOH
identifies the greatest period of risk as January to March
2006 and plans to open a tender in January 2006. Any company
winning a tender will then need to develop a production
capacity, acquire the raw materials, and train staff. It is
hard to imagine that regular production will begin in time to
make any significant quantity of the drug available by March.
Paal