Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05SOFIA1808
2005-10-20 06:52:00
SECRET
Embassy Sofia
Cable title:  

BULGARIA CONFIRMS MANPADS COMPONENTS SHIPPED,

Tags:  PARM PREL MASS MARR BG 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
S E C R E T SOFIA 001808 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/20/2015
TAGS: PARM PREL MASS MARR BG
SUBJECT: BULGARIA CONFIRMS MANPADS COMPONENTS SHIPPED,
CLAIMS MISUNDERSTANDING

REF: STATE 154646

Classified By: DCM Jeffrey D. Levine for reasons b, c, and d

S E C R E T SOFIA 001808

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/20/2015
TAGS: PARM PREL MASS MARR BG
SUBJECT: BULGARIA CONFIRMS MANPADS COMPONENTS SHIPPED,
CLAIMS MISUNDERSTANDING

REF: STATE 154646

Classified By: DCM Jeffrey D. Levine for reasons b, c, and d


1. (S) SUMMARY: The GOB confirmed that 50 MANPADS components
were shipped to Egypt after the conclusion of a
U.S.-Bulgarian bilateral agreement intended to take Bulgaria
out of the commercial MANPADS business. The GOB maintains it
never committed to preventing this sale and claims a
misunderstanding has occurred. Further guidance requested.
(See para 7). END SUMMARY.


2. (S) DCM and Poloff delivered reftel demarche to multiple
deputy minister and working-level contacts in the GOB in late
August and early September. Ms. Ivelina Bahchevanova,
Director for Defense and Economic Cooperation and
Internationally Controlled Trade in the Ministry of Economy
and Energy, confirmed October 18 that the Bulgarian company
Samel-90 and the Egyptian MOD had signed a contract for 300
Strela-2M gripstocks (part number 9P58) substantially prior
to the exchange of diplomatic notes between the USG and the
GOB concerning MANPADS on January 21, 2005. To date, 50
units have been shipped. The contract did not include any
complete systems, missiles, explosive material, or electronic
parts. The Bulgarian Commission for Control of Foreign Trade
Transactions with Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies
has temporarily suspended the export license for this
contract, and, in Bahchevanova's personal opinion, the
remaining 250 units can be a subject for consultation between
the USG and the GOB. However, she added that the customer
does not appear interested in purchasing the remaining 250
units.


3. (S) The decision to grant an export license for this
contract was initially suspended during negotiations with the
USG on the MANPADS agreement. Bahchevanova said that the MFA
had addressed this contract with the "State Department or the
American Embassy," but she was unable to confirm where or
with whom, and that the MFA had received no response. The
Commission discussed this contract several times and decided
to grant an export license for the following reasons: 1) the
nature of the goods - non-explosive, non-electronic, and 2)
no intermediary company or broker was involved.


4. (S) Bahchevanova recalled the April 11 meeting in which
she and Christo Atanasov, also from her office, met with
Poloff's predecessor. According to our records, Ministry
officials Bahchevanova and Atanasov informed Poloff's
predecessor that the GOB would not approve this transfer.
However, she claimed that, "Neither I nor Christo promised
anything. It was not in our mandate at the working level to
do so." She said that she had reviewed her meeting notes,
which she passed to her deputy minister and minister, and she
asserted that no assurances were given and claimed there was
"some kind of misunderstanding."


5. (S) Bahchevanova gave Poloff copies of the following
documents: 1) an end-user certificate from the Egyptian MOD;
2) a delivery verification certificate for 50 units from Arab
International Optronics, which she described as an Egyptian
Government-owned company, stating the end user was the
Egyptian MOD; and 3) a three-page document in Arabic
pertaining to the sale bearing the stamp of the Bulgarian
Embassy in Cairo.


6. (S) Bahchevanova expressed her personal opinion that the
USG and the GOB should formalize the consultation process and
create some sort of written record of the final GOB decision
in cases such as this to avoid future misunderstandings.
(Note: The GOB has had a draft consultation procedure from us
since the diplomatic notes were exchanged in January, but has
yet to formally accept it. In conjunction with our multiple
demarches, we again presented copies of the proposed
consultation procedure). Bahchevanova added that it was
possible there might never be another instance in which the
GOB would want to export MANPADS or MANPADS components.
Poloff asked Bahchevanova to continue the export license
suspension until she heard back from us. She agreed.


7. (S) COMMENT: The GOB's decision to proceed with this
contract despite USG objections is disappointing. However,
we do not expect the GOB to make a habit of evading the
spirit of the agreement in the future. It appears that this
transaction was allowed to proceed, in part, because it
originated prior to the exchange of diplomatic notes. We
will use this opportunity to push the GOB to formally accept
a structured consultation process. We suggest Washington
provide instructions requesting the approved export license
be cancelled in the spirit of our agreements. Additional
talking points supporting this position are requested.
LEVINE