Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05SOFIA1380
2005-08-03 15:22:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Sofia
Cable title:  

BULGARIA: SIMEON'S PARTY HAS SLIM CHANCES TO FORM A

Tags:  PGOV BU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SOFIA 001380 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA: SIMEON'S PARTY HAS SLIM CHANCES TO FORM A
GOVERNMENT AS TALKS WITH SOCIALISTS STALL

Ref: (A) SOFIA 1134, (B) SOFIA 1325, (C) SOFIA 1363

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SOFIA 001380

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA: SIMEON'S PARTY HAS SLIM CHANCES TO FORM A
GOVERNMENT AS TALKS WITH SOCIALISTS STALL

Ref: (A) SOFIA 1134, (B) SOFIA 1325, (C) SOFIA 1363


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: PM Simeon Saxe-Coburg's party, which
ranked second in the June elections, is struggling to forge
a coalition deal with the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP).
However, given the deep bitterness that emerged during the
BSP's failed attempt to form a government, talks between
Simeon's party and the BSP appear to be going nowhere.
Initial consultations have given way to dueling press
statements and much of the BSP now considers the Simeon
Movement an unacceptable partner. Although forming a
government from the new parliament is still possible, a
quick ending to Bulgaria's political stalemate does not
appear near. If the NMSS fails to form a government, the
President will give the third and final mandate to one of
the remaining parliamentary groups. There is increased
speculation among the political class about the possibility
of early elections in the autumn. END SUMMARY

SIMEON'S "GENEROUS OFFER"


2. (U) The National Movement for Simeon II (NMSS) launched
coalition talks August 1, following the Socialists' dramatic
failure to win parliamentary support for their minority
cabinet the week of July 25. The NMSS said it would seek to
form a broad coalition government, the core of which should
be Simeon's party and the Socialists. However, negotiations
between the two parties have so far consisted of little more
than exchanging open letters. Nevertheless, the NMSS, which
has only 53 MPs in the 240-seat parliament, is struggling to
woo the BSP (Ref. B). In an effort to heal the Socialists'
wounded pride following last week's bitter parliamentary
defeat, the NMSS said that BSP could have the Prime
Minister's position if it agrees to enter into a coalition.

SOCIALISTS SAY NO DEAL


3. (SBU) The Socialists are unimpressed by the NMSS's
generosity and appear unlikely to accept a deal. They see
the NMSS's behavior last week as treachery and its offer
this week as a trap aimed at further humiliating the
Socialists. In reply to a written offer from the NMSS, the
Socialists on August 2 sent a letter to the NMSS consisting
of 12 rhetorical questions, nearly all of which imply past
perfidy on the part of the NMSS. The Socialists say they
will restart talks only when the NMSS answers the questions,
which concern, inter alia, the format of the coalition, the
policies of the future government, the name of the PM-

designate, NMSS's position on the nationalist group Ataka,
its position on the recent confrontation in parliament, and
controversial financial deals sealed by the incumbent
government. The BSP demands that the response be sent in a
letter, signed personally by Saxe-Coburg. A senior BSP
official told us that while it was not a direct rejection of
the NMSS offer, the 12 questions were meant as a "diplomatic
no." The level of BSP representation during the first round
of talks with the NMSS August 1 also indicates they are not
seriously considering a deal with Simeon. The Socialists
were represented by mid-level officials while its chief
negotiator -- deputy chairman Roumen Petkov -- was resting
on the Black Sea coast.

COMPLEX POLITICAL PUZZLE


4. (U) The NMSS also held consultations on the formation of
the government with the three small parties of the
fragmented center-right and, unlike the Socialists, with
extreme nationalist group Ataka. Forming an NMSS-led center-
right government, however, is not numerically possible
without backing from either the MRF or Ataka. The MRF has
publicly ruled out supporting an NMSS government that
excludes the Socialists. On the other hand, two of the
center-right groups say they would not enter a coalition
which includes the Socialists.


5. (U) There is no firm deadline for the President to ask
the NMSS to form a government, and Simeon's party has
indicated they will take their time holding consultations
(Ref. A). To avoid a humiliating scene similar to what the
BSP suffered last week, Simeon's party said they will accept
the seven-day mandate to form a government only after
receiving agreement on the name of the PM-designate from
their prospective coalition partner and securing
parliamentary support of the proposed government line-up.
If the NMSS is unable to put together a working coalition,
Purvanov will task one of the other parliamentary groups to
nominate a PM. If that fails, the President will dissolve
parliament, install a caretaker government, and call for new
elections.


6. (SBU) The President's top legal advisor told us August 3
that Purvanov "will be forced to take a decision" if the
NMSS is unable to come up with a PM-designate by the end of
next week. If, as now seems likely, the mandate to form a
government is given to a third party, we can expect the
process to drag on at least through the end of August before
the President must decide whether to call new elections. By
law the parties and the Central Election Commission must be
given at least two months to prepare for elections.


7. (SBU) COMMENT: Under the current composition of
parliament, an NMSS/Socialist coalition remains the most
viable and stable option. However, given the Socialists'
bitterness over the "humiliation" they suffered in last
week's vote, and the complex configuration in parliament,
the chances of Simeon's party forming a government this time
around appear slim. The dramatic events that accompanied
their parliamentary defeat last week seem to have embittered
the Socialists to the point that they are unwilling to
seriously consider forming a coalition with the NMSS. While
the BSP officially says the door remains open for talks with
Simeon's group, the message we are getting from Socialist
contacts is that they do not trust the NMSS sufficiently to
form a government with them.


8. (SBU) COMMENT cont'd. The Socialists also see a possible
coalition deal with the ex-king's party under the current
circumstances as a threat to the party's long-term survival.
Just the optics of having their leader accept the
premiership from His Royal Highness Simeon II is enough to
make the Socialists dig in their heels. Some Socialists
have told us they would rather wait for the mandate to go to
one of the small groups in parliament -- such as the MRF or
the center-right Bulgarian People's Union -- and then try
again to form a government. Some NMSS insiders have also
indicated that they see the third mandate as their best hope
for forming a coalition with the Socialists and perhaps the
MRF or the People's Union. While we are primarily
observers, we have noted to contacts on all sides our belief
that the rapid establishment of a stable government is in
Bulgaria's best interest. We are also strongly discouraging
consideration of Ataka participation in any government. END
COMMENT
LEVINE