Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05SOFIA1363
2005-07-28 13:50:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Sofia
Cable title:  

BULGARIA: AS SOCIALISTS FAIL AMID POLITICAL CHAOS,

Tags:  PGOV BU 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SOFIA 001363 

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/28/2015
TAGS: PGOV BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA: AS SOCIALISTS FAIL AMID POLITICAL CHAOS,
SIMEON MOVEMENT GETS ITS CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT

REF: A. (A) SOFIA 1134


B. (B) SOFIA 1325

C. (C) SOFIA 1329

D. (D) SOFIA 1339

Classified By: Jeffrey D. Levine for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SOFIA 001363

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/28/2015
TAGS: PGOV BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA: AS SOCIALISTS FAIL AMID POLITICAL CHAOS,
SIMEON MOVEMENT GETS ITS CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT

REF: A. (A) SOFIA 1134


B. (B) SOFIA 1325

C. (C) SOFIA 1329

D. (D) SOFIA 1339

Classified By: Jeffrey D. Levine for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: A hostile opposition rejected the minority
government of Socialist PM-designate Sergei Stanishev in a
dramatic 117 to 118 vote shortly before midnight July 27.
The Socialists, who overplayed their hand with an elaborate
scheme to secure votes for their proposed minority
government, admitted defeat July 28 after a night of chaos
that threatened a constitutional crisis. President Georgi
Purvanov will now ask the party of PM Simeon Saxe-Coburg, as
the second largest parliamentary group, to form a government.
The escalation of tension and the dilution of power among
seven parties, however, indicate it will be difficult for
Simeon to form a cabinet without a substantial improvement in
the political climate. If this attempt fails, Bulgaria could
face early elections. END SUMMARY

SIMEON,S CHANCES UNCERTAIN


2. (C) With the failure of the Socialists to form a
government, the mandate now passes to the former king,s
National Movement for Simeon II (NMSS) (Ref. A). The NMSS
must either turn for support to the Socialists, who,
following the dramatic developments over the past days, vow
they will not back a NMSS cabinet, or the fragmented
center-right. The latter case would also require either the
predominantly Turkish Movement for Rights and Freedom (MRF),
or the extreme nationalist group Ataka. MRF, the junior
coalition partner in the incumbent government, has publicly
ruled out backing Simeon for a second term. A member of the
NMSS Political Council told us they will first turn to the
Socialists. He believed the NMSS would not insist on Simeon
as the Prime Minister, which might improve its chances of
coming to agreement with the Socialists. Stanishev, he said,
is no longer an option.

NEXT STEPS


3. (SBU) There is no set deadline for the President to ask
the second place group to form a government. If the NMSS
fails to propose a cabinet within seven days of being asked,
or if the parliament fails to approve its government line-up,
Purvanov, at his discretion, tasks one of the other
parliamentary groups to nominate a PM. If it comes to this

scenario, analysts agree the chances of forming a government
are negligible. If the third attempt to form a government
fails, the President appoints a caretaker government,
dissolves parliament and schedules new elections. New
elections would take a minimum of two months and likely
jeopardize the reforms needed for a 2007 EU entry. This
possibility is a nightmare for all parties and should
increase their motivation to arrive at an accord.

MIDNIGHT VOTE


4. (U) After a tense eight-hour debate June 27 and a 24-hour
standoff the previous day (ref C),MPs decided on a complex
voting procedure with two separate anonymous votes ) one on
Stanishev's PM nomination and the second on his proposal for
a government line-up (Ref. C, D). The Socialist leader's
nomination as prime minister was approved by a single vote
(120 to 119). In a dramatic midnight twist, however, the MPs
then rejected the government line-up proposed by Stanishev
with 118 votes against and 117 votes in favor. The negative
outcome of this second vote, announced at 2:00 a.m., meant,
according to most analysts, an overall rejection of the
Socialist-led government. In a last-ditch attempt at power,
the Socialists demanded a repeat of the government vote,
citing irregularities in the first. After their proposal was
rejected, and Parliament failed to achieve a quorum the
morning of July 28, the Socialists acknowledged defeat.


5. (U) The Socialists had been forced to form a minority
government with only the MRF after month-long coalition talks
with Simeon,s party collapsed (Ref. B). In an address to
parliament July 28, Stanishev blamed the opposition for its
&irresponsibility8. He said a stable government backed by
this parliament was impossible without the participation of
the BSP and MRF. Stanishev, in a nod to possible early
elections, laid the blame on opposition leaders and stressed
the need for &nationally responsible behavior8 that would
keep Bulgaria on track for accession to the EU.

SCHEMES, PASSIONS AND CHAOS: THE UNDOING OF THE SOCIALISTS


6. (C) The Socialist's plan to elect its minority government
rested on back-room maneuverings to hold a secret vote.
Rarely used in previous post-communist parliaments, they
believed the secret ballot would allow individual MPs from


other parties to augment their coalition's 116 MPs in the
240-seat parliament. BSP insiders have told us privately
they had arranged the support of a handful of MPs from the
center-right Bulgarian People's Union to secure the decision
on the secret vote. Another few MPs, from nationalist group
Ataka, were then supposed to back the government in the
secret vote. The plan quickly became obvious and a number of

SIPDIS
factors, including reports that three Ataka MPs were locked
in a room by their party colleagues to prevent them from
backing the Socialists, brought the plan to ruin. Passions
escalated further when opposition MPs physically prevented
Socialist MPs from taking the floor to request a repetition
of the vote for the government.


7. (C) COMMENT: In this charged political environment the
final outcome is still difficult to predict. The Socialist
move to press their advantage late last week backfired, but
Simeon,s party seems no better positioned. All possible
scenarios require the parties, which are currently
passionately antagonistic towards each other, to set aside
their bitterness and join in a common cause. Despite his
humiliation during the vote, Stanishev,s decision to return
the mandate, at least for now, has him looking the most
responsible. He has already begun the political gamesmanship
of assigning blame to Simeon in anticipation of possible
early elections. President Purvanov has also suffered from
these events. Political insiders agree that his insistence
on the MRF,s presence in the coalition ) in order to win
its support for his 2006 re-election campaign, contributed
greatly to breakdown of the initial coalition talks that led
to the Socialist's failure.