Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05SANAA3591
2005-12-27 11:25:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Sanaa
Cable title:  

UNITEL SIGNS CONTRACT FOR YEMEN'S THIRD GSM

Tags:  PGOV EFIN ECPS EIND EINV ETTC KMPI KMCA YM ECON COM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SANAA 003591 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/23/2015
TAGS: PGOV EFIN ECPS EIND EINV ETTC KMPI KMCA YM ECON COM
SUBJECT: UNITEL SIGNS CONTRACT FOR YEMEN'S THIRD GSM
OPERATOR, FAILS TO PAY

REF: SANAA 2844

Classified By: Ambassador Thomas C. Krajeski for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d
).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SANAA 003591

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/23/2015
TAGS: PGOV EFIN ECPS EIND EINV ETTC KMPI KMCA YM ECON COM
SUBJECT: UNITEL SIGNS CONTRACT FOR YEMEN'S THIRD GSM
OPERATOR, FAILS TO PAY

REF: SANAA 2844

Classified By: Ambassador Thomas C. Krajeski for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d
).


1. (C) SUMMARY. After winning Yemen's third GSM license
under a dubious tendering process with a staggering bid of
USD 149 billion, Unitel has now failed to pay. Initially
billed by the Ministry of Telecommunications as a Chinese
company, Unitel now appears to have no Chinese investors at
all. A small group of Yemeni businessmen behind Unitel are
seeking new capital from regional investors, but have met
with little success. This is the latest violation of a
tendering process that was suspect from the beginning, and
offers new evidence of foul play at the ministry. END
SUMMARY.


2. (U) After winning Yemen's third GSM tender over two months
ago, Unitel finally signed an operating contract with the
ROYG on November 28. According to the terms of the tender
document, the company had fifteen days to pay the full amount
of its bid -- USD 149 million. (Ref A) The document
specifies that in the case of non-payment, the award should
go to another bidder. (Note: Post advocated for the American
bid of Millicom-Motorola. End note.) As of December 23, no
payment had been made. Nevertheless, Unitel Executive
Director Mohammad Ahmed al-Koor confidently announced in the
government-controlled paper "May 22" that, "The company would
open service to customers by the second half of 2006."


3. (C) According to Tarik al-Haydari, CEO of GSM competitor
Sabafon, there is no Chinese investment in Unitel, as
previously announced. The company is the creation of al-Koor
and two former executives of GSM competitor Spacetel, and any
Chinese involvement appears to be strictly in the area of
equipment sales. Fathi Fahem, who submitted a bid for the
GSM tender with Millicom, estimated that the principal
investors in Unitel have no more than USD 10 million
combined, and have been desperately searching for new
investors. Recent visits from Jordanian and Palestinian
mobile phone operators to Yemen would seem to confirm these
suspicions. The absence of Chinese investors contradicts
months of information from the Ministry of Telecommunications
and Information Technology (MOTIT),which repeatedly
suggested that Unitel was a serious bidder backed by China
Mobile.


4. (C) Officials within MOTIT, many of whom expressed
discomfort to Econoff with ROYG management of the tender,
publicly expressed impatience with the newest irregularities
in the tender process. If Unitel does not pay its bid amount
in full, said Deputy Minister al-Hammami, the ROYG will award
the contract to the next highest bidder (Omantel). Despite
such statements, the ROYG has thus far not imposed a deadline
on payment, in effect allowing Unitel an unlimited extension
to raise the necessary capital. As part of his sales pitch,
Al-Koor claims that the ROYG will allow investors to pay in
installments, and to make such payments contingent on
profits. Such an arrangement, while practical from an
investment perspective, is a clear violation of the official
tender document.


5. (C) COMMENT: Unitel's failure to pay comes as no surprise
to observers of Yemen's High Tendering Board and the Ministry
of Telecommunications. Unitel's bid of USD 149 million was
fifty percent higher than its nearest competitor, and by all
accounts had no basis in reality. There was never clear
evidence of Chinese backing, and many observers believed that
the bid included debt forgiveness to MOTIT in the amount of
USD 80 million, provided by the Chinese for Yemen Mobile, the
ROYG's ill-fated CDMA mobile phone venture. The size of
Unitel's bid, however, attracted enormous attention from both
high officials and outside observers. Facing a budget
crunch, the Minister of Finance insisted that the full bid
amount be deposited into the treasury. Ambassador and others
insisted that for the sake of Yemen's investment climate, the
tender documents must be followed. The Chinese, with no
intention of paying cash to enter the Yemeni market,
abandoned the deal and revealed the tender process as a
farce. Stuck with a tab of USD 149 million and growing anger
both inside and outside the ROYG, Unitel and the ministry are
now looking to change the terms of the tender in an effort to
save face, and perhaps their necks. END COMMENT.
Krajeski