Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ROME2296
2005-07-08 17:16:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

G-4 UNSC RESOLUTION: ITALY AGREES ON IMPORTANCE OF

Tags:  PREL IT UNSC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

081716Z Jul 05
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 002296 

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/08/2015
TAGS: PREL IT UNSC
SUBJECT: G-4 UNSC RESOLUTION: ITALY AGREES ON IMPORTANCE OF
DELAY, WILL CIRCULATE UFC ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION TODAY

REF: STATE 126870

Classified By: DCM Emil Skodon, for reasons 1.4 (B)(D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 002296

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/08/2015
TAGS: PREL IT UNSC
SUBJECT: G-4 UNSC RESOLUTION: ITALY AGREES ON IMPORTANCE OF
DELAY, WILL CIRCULATE UFC ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION TODAY

REF: STATE 126870

Classified By: DCM Emil Skodon, for reasons 1.4 (B)(D).


1. (C) DCM delivered reftel points to Giacomo Sanfelice de
Monteforte, MFA Deputy Director General for Multilateral
Affairs (DG Giulio Terzi is still at the G-8 Summit in
Gleneagles) and Alessandro Busacca, Director of the MFA UN
Office, emphasizing Secretary Rice's view that we consider it
important to first address other UN reforms before tackling
the Security Council issue. In our view, the G-4 resolution
is unhelpfully divisive and would lead ultimately to a UN
Charter amendment that may not be approved by the U.S.
Senate. Our goal is to delay a vote on the resolution and
first address the criteria for new UNSC membership. This
position does not reflect our support or opposition for
membership of any particular state.


2. (C) Sanfelice de Monteforte responded that Italy very
much shares this position. He reiterated Italy's view that
the G-4 resolution is not based on a sufficient consensus and
will divide member states and regions. However, Italy is
working on the assumption there will be a vote. UFC
countries are reviewing a series of tactical actions to
prevent or roll back support, especially among the African
states.


3. (C) Responding to G-4 claims that there is no
alternative, Italy and the Uniting for Consensus (UFC)
countries are about to circulate a draft resolution in New
York; the text is embargoed until 1100 New York time July 8.
Although the text was still being discussed, Sanfelice de
Monteforte expected it would be the same as the UFC text
distributed on May 27 (a proposal for 25 UNSC members,
including 5 permanent members and 20 non-permanent members
elected for two-year terms by the General Assembly based on
their support for UN goals and operations and with an
equitable geographic distribution). Italy had considered a
three-year mandate for these non-permanent members but has
now agreed to two-year terms.


4. (C) Italy was pleased that the G-4 resolution had
attracted only 27 sponsors to date, far less than the G-4 had
hoped. Sanfelice de Monteforte noted that the key was to
convince the African states, who often voted in a 53 member
bloc, not to meld the African Union draft approved at the
Libya summit with the G-4 draft. The key difference was that
the AU draft continued to insist on veto power for the new
non-permanent members.


5. (C) Sanfelice de Monteforte noted that Italy was
surprised and disappointed that Afghanistan had sponsored the
resolution and asked that the U.S. press hard to convince
Kabul to withdraw its support. This would send an important
signal to states who have not yet made commitments. Also,
Italy would appreciate the U.S. approaching its allies in the
Caribbean, Africa (especially 'gray' states of Kenya, Eritrea
and Ethiopia) and the Middle East (Maghreb states concerned
about the balance of power in Africa) to oppose the G-4
resolution.


SEMBLER


NNNN
2005ROME02296 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL