Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ROME1635
2005-05-12 07:51:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

IRAQ/ITALY:MORE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS ON

Tags:  PREL MOPS PGOV IZ IT IRAQI FREEDOM 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 001635 

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/10/2015
TAGS: PREL MOPS PGOV IZ IT IRAQI FREEDOM
SUBJECT: IRAQ/ITALY:MORE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS ON
TROOP DRAWDOWN

REF: A. ROME 902

B. ROME 1446

Classified By: Pol M/C Tom Countryman for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 001635

SIPDIS


E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/10/2015
TAGS: PREL MOPS PGOV IZ IT IRAQI FREEDOM
SUBJECT: IRAQ/ITALY:MORE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS ON
TROOP DRAWDOWN

REF: A. ROME 902

B. ROME 1446

Classified By: Pol M/C Tom Countryman for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (C) Summary. Following Berlusconi's recent statements on
future troop withdrawals in Iraq (Ref A),both DefMin Martino
and FM Fini have made statements in the past week suggesting
that Italy will begin a major drawdown after the end of the
year. Post views these statements, in the run-up to national
elections in spring 2006, as designed for domestic political
consumption rather than signs of a wavering Italian
commitment in Iraq. However, we will need to continue to
press the Italians to ensure that any actual withdrawals are
decided upon and announced only after full consultation with
coalition partners and only if the security conditions on the
ground permit. We should also encourage Italy to balance any
withdrawal of military forces with an increased contribution
to the NATO Training Mission in Iraq. End summary.

DefMin Martino -- Looking Toward Troop Reductions
-------------- --------------


2. (U) Following PM Berlusconi's March 15 surprise comments
on troop withdrawal (Ref A),other key Italian leaders have
begun to chime in. Speaking to reporters on May 7, DefMin
Antonio Martino looked ahead to "a reduction of the foreign
military presence in Iraq" -- a reduction that would
obviously include Italian military forces. Martino would not
name a date when Italy would begin to withdraw troops,
stating that the "re-sizing" would depend on improvements in
the Iraqi security situation. But Martino did say that such
improvements in security may take place even before
ratification of the Iraqi constitution and the subsequent
Iraqi parliamentary elections. He noted the "very satisfying"
security situation in Nassiriya where Italian troops are
deployed and where, thanks to Iraqi and Italian forces, there
have been no recent security incidents. Italy's Iraq mission,
according to Martino, is a commitment that will last only a
limited period of time, as opposed to Italy's long-term
commitment to Afghanistan and its entirely open-ended
commitment to Kosovo.

FM Fini -- Withdrawal in Early 2006

--------------


3. (U) At a May 10 press conference, MFA Gianfranco Fini said
that the Italian withdrawal will coincide with "the last stop
on the road laid out by the UN," that is, after Iraqi
parliamentary elections slated for December 2005. After the
elections, Italy might stay another month or two at the
request of the Iraqi government, making January or February
2006 the possible time for withdrawal. Fini suggested that
it would be a phased withdrawal, probably starting no later
than January or February 2006, but did not exclude the
possibility of a small first step (i.e., 100 carabinieri) in
the fall. Like Martino, he spoke of Italian withdrawal as
part of a coalition-wide modification and specifically stated
that it would not be a unilateral action on the part of
Italy. And like Martino, Fini conditioned Italian withdrawal
on the security situation, at the same time claiming that
increased insurgent attacks on Iraqi government forces show
that Iraqis are beginning to take control of the security
situation.


4. (C) Comment. These comments come as no surprise following
Berlusconi's statements on force reduction. We expect to
hear more such declarations as the campaign for the 2006
elections (already well under way) gathers steam. Post
believes these comments have two purposes: after a
humiliating defeat in last month's regional elections,
resulting in the resignation and reformation of the
Berlusconi government (Ref B),and, according to recent
polls, facing possible electoral defeat in next spring's
national elections, the Berlusconi government is seeking to
assure a public largely opposed to the Italian presence in
Iraq that the end is in sight. At the same time, however,
playing to the wider international audience, Berlusconi,
Martino, and Fini have couched their words carefully with the
caveats that any decisions will be based on the conditions on
the ground in Iraq, both political and security, and done in
consultation with other coalition partners. We need to hold
the Italians to their word on this latter point and remind
them of Berlusconi's promise to President Bush that he would


consult closely before making any changes. Furthermore, we
should push the Italians to balance any troop withdrawals
with a compensating increase in support for the NATO Training
Mission in Iraq, where the Italians have already staked out a
leading role -- for which they should be thanked whenever
possible. (Note. NATO and UN-sanctioned operations are much
more digestible to the Italian public. End note.)


5. (C) Comment continued. Over the past few weeks the MFA
Iraq Task Force Director Luigi Maccotta has, in response to
PolOff's probing, repeatedly said that Italy will stay the
course. He opined that Berlusconi would appear weak and
catering to the opposition if he adopts their position on
troop withdrawal, but instead would be viewed by the
electorate as a strong leader with an international vision
if he sticks to his commitments. Post tends to agree with
this assessment, but at the same time recognizes that,
realistically, to pacify the majority of voters that oppose
the Italian presence in Iraq, he has to give them some hope
that the end is in sight. As these pronouncements become
more frequent over the next few months, the biggest challenge
will be ensuring that they don't become a self-fulfilling
prophecy by creating a momentum that leads to public
expectations for an automatic full-scale troop withdrawal in
January or February 2006. If Berlusconi boxes himself in too
much, when push comes to shove, despite his personal
commitment to President Bush, reelection will become his top
priority. We should stress to GOI officials how important it
is that they continue to emphasize publicly that Italy will
not stray from its commitment to the Iraqi people.


6. (C) Comment continued. At an April 1 MFA lunch at the MFA
for visiting UNSYG Qazi, CHOD Admiral di Paola told DCM that
we shouldn't focus on the numbers so much. Italy could
withdraw 300 troops tomorrow, he said, and it would have no
effect on Italy's ability to carry out its mission in its
assigned area, since the decrease in manpower could be
compensated by an increase in other abilities, i.e.,
Predators. We should consider urging GOI officials to stress
that, even if Italy reduces the number of soldiers deployed,
it will maintain to the extent possible its ability to meet
its commitment to its mission in, and to the people and
government of, Iraq. End comment.


7. (U) Baghdad Minimize Considered

SEMBLER


NNNN
2005ROME01635 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL