Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05QUITO781
2005-04-08 22:54:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Quito
Cable title:  

ECUADOR: DIALOGUE UNDERWAY, STRIKE POSTPONED ONE

Tags:  PGOV ASEC EC 
pdf how-to read a cable
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 000781 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/01/2015
TAGS: PGOV ASEC EC
SUBJECT: ECUADOR: DIALOGUE UNDERWAY, STRIKE POSTPONED ONE
DAY

REF: GUAYAQUIL 424

Classified By: Ambassador Kristie A. Kenney. Reason 1.4 (b&d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 000781

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/01/2015
TAGS: PGOV ASEC EC
SUBJECT: ECUADOR: DIALOGUE UNDERWAY, STRIKE POSTPONED ONE
DAY

REF: GUAYAQUIL 424

Classified By: Ambassador Kristie A. Kenney. Reason 1.4 (b&d).


1. (C) Summary: The government and opposition appear closer
than ever to resolving the Supreme Court issue. However,
they may not achieve congressional passage of a measure to do
so before April 13, the new start date for an indefinite
strike in the capital and Azuay province. Still in play are
issues of trust and political gamesmanship between the
Democratic Left (ID) and the government. Thus far, the
Ambassador's public call for dialogue has been well-received
by all. We continue to urge all toward a durable compromise
to avert risks to stability. Returned ex-president Bucaram's
presence is being felt in various unhelpful ways. We have
registered our concern over Bucaram's pro-Chavez homecoming
remarks through intermediaries, and will delay meeting with
him directly until the situation here settles. End Summary.

Dialogue Progress
--------------


2. (C) Press and Embassy political contacts report that the
government and the opposition (PSC, DP, the socialists, some
in the ID, independents, and President Gutierrez' PSP, for a
total of 60 votes in favor) have nearly reached consensus on
a bill to vacate the current Supreme Court and lay out a new
process to select a politically-neutral replacement court.
The government has pledged that the President would not veto
the bill, provided it meets certain conditions (including
ratification of the selection procedures in a referendum).
On April 7, Congress met but did not put the measure to a
vote. The next opportunity will be on April 12.

Strike Moved Back
--------------


3. (U) Street protests in Quito tapered off on April 7 and
are not expected again until April 11 at the earliest. The
Assembly of Quito agreed on April 7 to accommodate a request
from counterparts in Azuay province to shift the date of the
general strike from April 12 (a holiday in Azuay) to April

13. The minister of education subsequently closed all public
and private schools in Pichincha province from April 8-13.
Guayaquil mayor Jaime Nebot and PSC coastal mayors will meet
to determine their own protest actions on April 11, but Nebot
has stated that any protest in Guayaquil will not be

indefinite nor seek to shut down the city. Apart from the
Quito Chamber of Commerce, business groups have expressed
opposition to a strike. Embassy cultural contacts in Cuenca,
capital of Azuay province, report that few preparations for a
strike are apparent and that street action there has been
limited to candlelight vigils in condolence for the passing
of the Pope.


4. (U) Leaders of the main indigenous group (CONAIE) have
called for their own mobilization next week, and provincial
indigenous leaders tell us they are putting out the word. It
is not clear, however, whether indigenous protests will be
coordinated with strike leaders in Pichincha or arranged
independently. Cesar Montufar, leader of a civil society
group which has participated in the Assembly of Quito, told
us he believed mayor Moncayo made a grave tactical error by
publicly calling on the army to cease supporting the
government. Montufar believes the ID would resist any accord
which would deflate their strike, seeking to deny the
government a political victory. He said it was doubtful
CONAIE could turn out sufficient numbers of indigenous to
destabilize the government.

Actions by Embassy Quito and CG Guayaquil
--------------


5. (SBU) The leading daily printed an editorial by the
Ambassador on April 7, calling on all sides to put aside
personal and partisan agendas to engage in dialogue on the
national interest of strengthening Ecuadorian democratic
institutions. Reaction to the editorial has been
overwhelmingly favorable thus far, especially from business
and Guayaquil leaders. Embassy and CG Guayaquil have engaged
in intensive outreach to government, opposition, indigenous
and civil society groups to reinforce this message.


6. (C) We have also made clear to the PRE our concern about
Bucaram's pro-Chavez and anti-FTA homecoming remarks
(RefTel). Bucaram intermediaries including his son Jacobo
have attempted to downplay the remarks, saying "these types
of (populist) statements are standard fare in Latin American
politics." Jacobo also said that President Gutierrez had
called his father to express concern; he implied that Bucaram
agreed to refrain from expressions about foreign policy
issues in the future. PRE Congressional leader Mario Touma
essentially told us the same, even adding that Bucaram had
not decided to run for president in 2006. Both said Bucaram
wished to meet with us to clear the air. We have put off any
direct meeting until the reaction generated by his return
settles further. Not coincidentally, both also expressed
concern about our ongoing review of the visa status of
Supreme Court president Guillermo Castro, a Bucaram ally. We
have refused comment on the review (on grounds of potential
flight risk),citing the privacy of visa matters.

Comment
--------------

7. (C) Much of the difficulty of resolving the court issue
in Congress revolves around Bucaram. President of Congress
Quintana, a Bucaram supporter, has repeatedly delayed
consideration of the current compromise, accused by the
opposition of buying time for the clock to run out on any
appeals of his decision. There are strong rumors that Castro
will use this extra time to absolve the notorious Isaias
brothers of pending corruption charges, in return for cash
and political support for Bucaram. Furthermore, the
lingering tussle over language of the congressional measure
to vacate the current court is really about whether the
Bucaram decision could be revisited by a future court. Were
the congress to rescind the resolution which created the
current court, Castro's decision on Bucaram would be called
into question. The government is therefore highly unlikely
to concede this point.


8. (C) The Congress has another opportunity to act to
resolve the court issue when Congress returns into session on
April 12. The hard-core opposition here, led by Mayor
Moncayo and Pichincha prefect Ramiro Gonzalez and their ID
allies in Congress, seem intent on blocking an accord until
after their strike occurs. We are counseling all sides to
avoid the political and economic risks of a strike by
redoubling efforts at dialogue.
KENNEY